
The state Supreme Court unanimously rejected voter advocacy group’s demands and dismissed the case
Brett Davis
The Center Square Washington
Representatives of the Let’s Go Washington voter advocacy group say they were blindsided Friday afternoon at learning the state Supreme Court was about to decide whether to invalidate all voter-backed initiatives on the Nov. 5 ballot. The court unanimously rejected their demands and dismissed the case.
This November, voters will decide on initiatives repealing the capital gains tax, prohibiting carbon tax credit trading and repealing provisions of the 2021 Climate Commitment Act, and allowing people to opt out of the state’s WA Cares long-term care program. A fourth initiative, sponsored by the Business Industry Association of Washington, would prohibit state and local governments from restricting access to natural gas.
The situation that came to a head on Friday afternoon involves two cases.
Earlier this year, the anti-initiatives organization, Defend Washington, filed a lawsuit against Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, claiming signatures to qualify the initiatives for the ballot were gathered illegally. This would mean the measures would need to re-qualify for the ballot. Attorney General Bob Ferguson represented the secretary of state in the case.
In another case, the Washington Conservation Action Defense Fund sued Hobbs in an attempt to invalidate the secretary of state’s certification of the initiative to prevent the government from restricting natural gas.
“These frivolous attempts to keep the voters from having a voice when it comes to energy choice are undemocratic and nothing short of voter suppression,” Greg Lane, BIAW executive vice president, said in a news release. “In essence, they are conceding through these desperate tactics that they know Washingtonians want energy choice.”
He concluded, “We’re pleased the over half a million people who signed our petition to stop gas bans in Washington will have the opportunity to vote on this in November.”
Jackson Maynard, executive director and counsel of the Citizen Action Defense fund, offered his legal opinion on behalf of himself.
“In 22 years of legal practice, I’ve never seen a case progress this far without all necessary parties being before the court or at least being given the courtesy of a phone call about litigation as important as this,” he told The Center Square. “Participation in the initiative process is a fundamental right, and the idea that the state Supreme Court with the stroke of a pen could’ve eliminated the voices of the millions who signed the petitions in this case without even hearing from all impacted parties is really troubling.”
The Attorney General’s Office and Secretary of State’s Office weren’t immediately available for comment Friday night.
This is a developing story.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Clark College officially opens Advanced Manufacturing Center in RidgefieldClark College marked the official opening of its Advanced Manufacturing Center in Ridgefield, a new facility focused on training students for careers in advanced manufacturing.
- POLL: With updated estimates reaching as high as $17.7 billion, what should happen to the I-5 Bridge replacement project?A new poll asks readers how the I-5 Bridge replacement project should proceed amid higher cost estimates and questions about transparency within the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.
- Letter: ‘Walz’s tough talk is a blatant attempt to deflect his complicity in the massive fraud in his state’Camas resident Anna Miller argues that a governor has no legal authority to deploy the National Guard to interfere with federal law enforcement and criticizes Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s public statements.
- VIDEO: Reykdal tells school districts to ‘abide by the law’ on trans athletesState Superintendent Chris Reykdal said Washington school districts must follow state law on transgender athletes as citizen initiatives and related Supreme Court cases move forward.
- County seeks community needs survey responses from residentsClark County Community Services is collecting survey responses from residents living on limited incomes to inform its required Community Needs Assessment and guide funding priorities for anti-poverty services.
- Opinion: Not a Good choiceLars Larson argues that personal choices led to a deadly confrontation with law enforcement during an ICE operation in Minneapolis.
- County Charter Review Commission to hold first two meetings in JanuaryThe Clark County Charter Review Commission will meet twice in January to begin reviewing the county’s charter and consider whether to recommend amendments for voter approval.








