Save Vancouver Streets wants the public to have bigger input on future projects, and a vote by the people whenever the city wants to eliminate a current lane of traffic on Vancouver’s major streets
Paul Valencia
Clark County Today
Save Vancouver Streets is still fighting the City of Vancouver.
The group filed a notice of appeal of a trial court decision that led to its initiative not being allowed to move forward and be placed on a ballot for a future election.
The initiative would have required a popular vote for any project that closed an existing lane of traffic for use by transit, pedestrians and/or bicycles. The city’s Complete Streets campaign has taken away several lanes of vehicle traffic in a number of locations in recent years and there are plans for the elimination of more lanes of traffic in the future.
Save Vancouver Streets collected more than 6,500 signatures in support of the initiative and presented the certified initiative to the City Council, as required in the Vancouver City Charter.
The city then claimed the initiative was legally invalid, and took no action on the initiative.
Save Vancouver Streets sued. The case was heard in May, and in late June, the judge ruled in the city’s favor.
According to a press release from Save Vancouver Streets, those who support the initiative believe there is precedence in their favor. In Rental Housing Association v. Federal Way, a court of appeals stated that only a judicial body, not a city attorney, could review legal validity.
“Save Vancouver Streets, respecting the will of over 6,500 residents of the City of Vancouver, has decided that the City Council has left us no choice but to proceed with this appeal,” the release noted. “It is fundamentally wrong for the City Council to choose to ignore the voices of residents and their desire to have a say.”
The appeal will be filed in the Washington State Court of Appeals Division II. If successful, the initiative could be placed on the ballot at a future election.
The appeal is being handled for Save Vancouver Streets by Jackson Maynard with Maynard Law PLLC.
Also read:
- Fiscal fallout: $375 million bond debt indirectly funding operating budget
Shifting $375 million from a loan fund impacts local infrastructure as Washington state covers operating costs with bond debt, prompting concern among officials and advocacy groups. - Lawsuit aims to block new eligibility requirements for WA sheriffs
Four sheriffs are suing over a state law that sets new eligibility rules, arguing it undermines voter authority by allowing removal for certification issues. - Opinion: The growing gap between public voice and political power
Todd Myers describes how large-scale protest and sign-ins often fail to sway state leaders, and argues authentic influence is most likely found through local action. - City of Battle Ground seeks applicants for Salary Commission vacancy
Battle Ground seeks a resident to join its independent Salary Commission, which reviews compensation and health benefits for local elected officials through 2027. - Opinion: Who is winning the race for affordable power?
Hydroelectric power keeps Washington competitive, but new laws and carbon pricing are driving up electricity costs for residents each year. - Vancouver Fire Department assists with Columbia River Marina fire response
Vancouver Fire Department joined Clark-Cowlitz and Scappoose crews to help fight a vessel and dock fire at Goble Marina, assisting in river operations where one boat sank and another was partially submerged. - White House govt. Funding request for 2027 cuts $73 billion
President Trump’s budget seeks to boost defense funding while cutting $73 billion from agencies like the EPA, NASA, and Agriculture, prompting sharp criticism from Democratic leaders.
