Save Vancouver Streets wants the public to have bigger input on future projects, and a vote by the people whenever the city wants to eliminate a current lane of traffic on Vancouver’s major streets
Paul Valencia
Clark County Today
Save Vancouver Streets is still fighting the City of Vancouver.
The group filed a notice of appeal of a trial court decision that led to its initiative not being allowed to move forward and be placed on a ballot for a future election.
The initiative would have required a popular vote for any project that closed an existing lane of traffic for use by transit, pedestrians and/or bicycles. The city’s Complete Streets campaign has taken away several lanes of vehicle traffic in a number of locations in recent years and there are plans for the elimination of more lanes of traffic in the future.
Save Vancouver Streets collected more than 6,500 signatures in support of the initiative and presented the certified initiative to the City Council, as required in the Vancouver City Charter.
The city then claimed the initiative was legally invalid, and took no action on the initiative.
Save Vancouver Streets sued. The case was heard in May, and in late June, the judge ruled in the city’s favor.
According to a press release from Save Vancouver Streets, those who support the initiative believe there is precedence in their favor. In Rental Housing Association v. Federal Way, a court of appeals stated that only a judicial body, not a city attorney, could review legal validity.
“Save Vancouver Streets, respecting the will of over 6,500 residents of the City of Vancouver, has decided that the City Council has left us no choice but to proceed with this appeal,” the release noted. “It is fundamentally wrong for the City Council to choose to ignore the voices of residents and their desire to have a say.”
The appeal will be filed in the Washington State Court of Appeals Division II. If successful, the initiative could be placed on the ballot at a future election.
The appeal is being handled for Save Vancouver Streets by Jackson Maynard with Maynard Law PLLC.
Also read:
- Leslie Lewallen stays and fights for Washington as director of Future 42 Clark County
Former Camas City Councilor Leslie Lewallen is leading the Clark County chapter of Future 42, a new organization focused on policy advocacy, accountability, and engaging persuadable voters at the local and state level. - Opinion: ‘Seeking might over right destroys representative government’
Retired judge Dave Larson argues that prioritizing political power over constitutional principles has undermined representative government and calls for renewed civic responsibility. - Letter: ‘Immigration’ resolution scheduled for this Wednesday at Clark County Council Meeting
Rob Anderson urges residents to closely watch an upcoming Clark County Council meeting where an immigration-related resolution and proposed rule changes are expected to be discussed. - Opinion: The 1700-square-foot solution to Washington’s housing crisis
An opinion column arguing that Washington’s energy code has driven up housing costs and outlining how HB 2486 aims to limit those impacts for smaller, more affordable homes. - Rep. John Ley’s new bill calls for an independent audit of Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project
Rep. John Ley introduced legislation requiring an independent audit of the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project to review costs, management, and oversight. - Letter: Public school vision
Clark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families. - County Charter Review Commission sets meeting schedule, selects officers
The Clark County Charter Review Commission set a weekly meeting schedule beginning Feb. 4 and selected officers as it begins its review of the county charter.
