Vancouver resident Kris Greene continues his conversation with League of Women Voters of Clark County officials over their recent decision regarding a candidate’s participation in a forum

I appreciate the League of Women Voters of Clark County responding to my concerns, but their explanation leaves me deeply unsatisfied. Their claim that they “cannot and will not do anything that advances one candidate over another” is problematic.

A candidate forum’s purpose is to provide voters with a platform to learn about the candidates and their positions. If an incumbent drops out citing a work conflict, it is not the League’s responsibility to enable this evasion of public scrutiny. This move effectively sabotages the democratic process, leaving only one candidate to present their views unchallenged.

The League’s definition of a forum should prioritize transparency and the voters’ right to make informed decisions. Allowing a candidate to back out due to vague conflicts undermines this ideal. Voters deserve more than empty seats and unanswered questions.

In the interest of fair elections, the League should reconsider their stance. If a candidate is scared to answer questions or face their opponent, it raises serious doubts about their suitability for office. Voters have the right to see how candidates handle the spotlight and respond to public scrutiny.

Kris Greene
Vancouver

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: What would it take for elected officials to believe high earners are leaving Washington?
  Capital gains tax collections fell more than 50% in 2024 despite a 25% stock market gain that year.
• 
  Opinion: IBR creates 50,000 road refugees
  Lars Larson argues IBR’s tolling plan would push 50,000 daily commuters off I-5 onto I-205.
• 
  Opinion: It’s time to save taxpayers from Sound Transit’s strategic misrepresentation
  Sound Transit’s ST3 rail program faces a $35 billion shortfall, and Southwest Washington taxpayers could bear new costs.
• 
  Opinion: A tax scam based on a climate lie
  Nancy Churchill argues the CCA costs families 52+ cents per gallon while missing every emissions target.
• 
  Letter: Why Washington state families are paying for local & foreign policy failures at the pump
  Jonathan Hines argues Washington’s $0.554/gal fuel tax turns global instability into a state windfall.