
Some state agencies are reporting that their staff are hesitant to use EVs
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
If you’re a Washington resident reluctant to buy or drive an electric vehicle due to the lack of charging infrastructure around the state or in cold weather conditions, you’re not alone.
Some state agencies are reporting that their staff are hesitant to use EVs for that same reason, highlighting an ongoing challenge for Gov. Jay Inslee’s efforts to electrify the public transportation sector. Most agencies are not on track to meet the state’s 2025 objectives.
Inslee in November 2021 signed an executive order directing the state agencies to transition away from fossil fuel vehicles and replace them with EVs. As part of that order, the cabinet agencies were tasked with meeting certain criteria regarding their light duty vehicle fleet.
The requirement is that they be:
- 40% EV by 2025
- 75% by 2030
- 100% by 2035
For medium and heavy duty vehicles (Class 2b and higher), the agency fleets must be 100% EV by 2040.
According to State Efficiency and Environmental Performance Office Director Hanna Waterstrat, five of the 24 cabinet agencies are either on track or exceeding the 2025 target of 40% EVs: the Governor’s Office, Puget Sound Partnership, the Department of Retirement Services, the Department of Commerce, and the Liquor and Cannabis Board.
“Vehicle availability has been tough especially starting out but things are really improving,” she told the Electric Vehicle Coordinating Council at its Wednesday meeting. She noted that “DES [Department of Enterprise Services] has been managing some funding for agency EV charging projects, but the demand has exceeded the available funding so far and we still have plenty of projects to do.”
The lack of public charging, and copper wire thefts disabling them, has proved a significant barrier for EV adoption. According to Waterstrat, Department of Commerce staff “are uncomfortable driving long distances or in poor weather in EVs, and sometimes opt to use gas powered daily trip rentals from the DES motor pool as an alternative. That said, we’ve developed brochures for each vehicle and for how to charge and we’re working on a series of educational videos that support our transition to EVs as well.”
The issues around inadequate charging ports was also noted by William Hannah, risk and budget manager for the Department of Ecology. He told the council that “the number one thing that we have with staff adopting EVs is the various charging infrastructure that is out there. Standardized charging infrastructure would be a huge help in training staff and getting them comfortable to take the EVs on long trips.”
Yet, he observed that “once staff were trained on how to use EV and how to use infrastructure, they commonly will respond that the EVs exceed expectations, that they’re quite nice to drive, and really meet the business need.”
According to a Thursday letter from the council to Inslee’s office, “charging infrastructure Data indicates that EV charging infrastructure is lagging. Washington is ahead of where it needs to be on public Level 2 charging (slower charging typically at a rate of 25 miles per hour) but well behind in fast charging (can charge from 20 to 80% battery capacity in about 20-30 minutes).”
As part of the upcoming 2025-2027 budget, the council’s member agencies have collectively submitted requests of funding of $499 to $537 million in Green Transportation Capital projects, including charging infrastructure.
Department of Commerce Clean Transportation Managing Director Steven Hershkowitz told colleagues at Wednesday’s meeting that they needed to push harder regarding legislative funding requests. “If we’re not achieving our goals as state agencies, we can’t be expecting other entities across the state, whether they’re local governments or private entities to be meeting the state standards.”
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Board authorizes C-TRAN to sign off on Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s SEISThe C-TRAN Board approved the Final SEIS for the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program, with Camas and Washougal opposing the vote over light rail cost concerns.
- C-TRAN ridership grows for fourth consecutive yearC-TRAN ridership topped 5 million trips in 2025, marking the fourth straight year of growth.
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
- Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflationJoe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.
- Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubesBob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.







Inslee is insane. I cant believe he actually thought that in 3 years he could change everything to what he thinks is best for our state. He put the cart before the horse in this situation. I’m not bashing EV’s, if you can afford them that’s great. They are however impractical for anything other than going to and from work or shopping right now.
His mind is only on green period. I’m curious to see some numbers on how many EV’s there are compared to regular vehicles in our state. We aren’t all for this huge change and especially so quickly. Gas, fuel, natural gas, propane and even wood are all on the chopping block at once. It might be a perfect world for him and his followers to be ahead of the rest of the US by being completely green (realistically not possible) but his dictatorship, like with the whole covid mess and demanding we all get vaccinated or else, is too much. He’s finally giving up his governorship so he can focus on his own agenda, scary, and wants his replacement with someone just like him to continue to be able to control green.
We need to slow this crazy train down.
On a personal note, I won’t ever give up my gas and fuel vehicles. Going up in the mountains off road is not made for EV’s. The places we go won’t support charging stations…