A look at how ranked-choice voting is used to manipulate outcomes
Editor’s note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Wire. Ranked-choice voting is a Clark County resolution on the Nov. 8 general election ballot. Washington Secretary of State candidate Julie Anderson supports ranked-choice voting.
Who exactly are the winners of this new and confusing electoral system called ranked-choice voting (RCV)? It’s not the thousands of voters that show up to the polls in RCV elections only to have their votes thrown out. The winners of RCV are partisans and special interests who use the system’s design to manipulate election outcomes and undermine states’ efforts to safeguard election integrity.
Take Maine, for example. In the 2018 2nd Congressional District election, Jared Golden, the Democrat, was declared the winner despite losing in the first round of tabulation with 45.58 percent to the Republican Bruce Poliquin’s 46.33 percent. To declare Golden the winner, more than 8,000 votes were systematically thrown out.
Take also Alaska, the most recent example. In the 2022 special election to fill the seat of the late Congressman Don Young, nearly 15,000 Alaskan votes were tossed out before the Democrat Mary Peltola was declared the winner. In fact, 60 percent of voters voted Republican in the first round, but by the last tally, Peltola came out ahead by just 5,129 votes. Conveniently for the Democrats, more than 11,000 ballots were exhausted – or tossed – by the second round simply because they only voted for the other Republican candidate instead of ranking all of the candidates.
If this sounds unfair, it’s because it is.
For all of our electoral history, candidates have been elected by a plurality of votes. Yet, RCV now requires a candidate to receive a majority of votes in order to be declared the winner. But the only way to create that majority is by systematically removing ballots from the final tally. If voters don’t rank every candidate — even those they would absolutely never support — they risk having their vote being removed from the final vote count. This is because even if a voter’s first choice earned the most votes in the first round, by the second, third, fourth, and subsequent rounds, that candidate — and the voter’s ballot — could be eliminated, as if the voter never showed up to the polls. Even in a runoff election, which is what RCV seeks to prevent, voters are given another chance to choose between candidates.
RCV therefore creates a fake majority, not a true majority. Not only does this fly in the face of our American principles of “one-person, one-vote,” it allows candidates to effectively “fail-up” to beat the candidate that had the most votes in the first round.
If this sounds complicated, it’s because it is.
Is it reasonable to think that voters will be adequately educated on every single candidate to rank each of them? Yet this is the burden placed on voters under the RCV system. And voters must comply with it, or risk having their vote thrown out.
To make matters worse, RCV threatens fast and accurate ballot counting. The results of Alaska’s special election weren’t officially announced for more than two weeks, leaving Alaskans without its at-large representation in Congress even longer than necessary. Complicated and delayed results further diminish voter confidence and lend themselves to accusations of voter fraud. And when the system itself promotes delayed results, as RCV does, it should be rejected. Florida and Tennessee have become the first states to pass legislation banning RCV for all state and local elections, and more states should follow suit.
RCV isn’t just a solution in search of a problem. It’s a confusing and unfair problem in and of itself. And our historic, simpler system of plurality voting works extremely well. Just look at our history. Our plurality system has given us leaders like President Abraham Lincoln, who received just 39.8 percent of the popular vote in the 1860 presidential election. And as others have rightly pointed out, under an RCV system, Lincoln likely would have lost.
Americans win when their votes count. One-person, one-vote, and we should keep it that way.
Writer Madeline Malisa is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Government Accountability.
This article was originally published by RealClearPolicy and made available via RealClearWire.
Also read:
- First person: Experiencing the Northern Lights for the first timeReporter Paul Valencia saw the Northern Lights for the first time in his life, and he saw them without having to leave Clark County, experiencing the beauty of light in the sky.
- Three weeks of night time delays on SR 14 and Lieser Road overpass in VancouverTravelers who use State Route 14 through Vancouver in southern Clark County, should plan ahead for three weeks of overnight closures.
- IMPACT CW Food Drive back for 10th year helping area familiesIMPACT Camas-Washougal, organized by St. Matthew Lutheran Church in Washougal, is celebrating 10 years of making a difference and impacting local lives.
- Update on PacifiCorp Lewis River dispersed shoreline campsitesPacifiCorp’s boat-in dispersed campsites located on Yale and Swift reservoirs are now open for 2024 reservations for the summer season – a new opportunity for visitors to the Lewis River area.
- Opinion: For the love of mom, vote yes on I-2124Let’s Go Washington Press Secretary Hallie Balch offers support for Initiative 2124, the Opt Out of State-Run Long Term Care Coverage Act.
- Public can pick their favorites in the 2024 Battle Ground Public Schools District Art ShowThe 65th annual Battle Ground Public Schools Art Show returns this month, bringing back the popular People’s Choice Award.
- Northern Lights to be seen tonight, May 10? Here in Clark County? MaybeThe Northern Lights, shown here from a post on the NOAA’s website, could be visible in Clark County tonight, May 10. Photo courtesy NOAA
Sounds like a perverted double-take on gerrymandering that is going on in Washington State.
It should be federally, state, as illegal.
Thanks Rubicon. I couldn’t agree more.
As if conservatives didn’t already have the cards stacked against them. This is what happens when democrats are in control and ‘We The People” don’t get to weigh in on decisions the democrats make to stack the cards. In the upcoming election, I will vote against this process. BTW: Thank you. This article simply confirmed what I already knew…and as my friends on Alaska recently discovered. Take care. God bless!
This complicated and confusing system of cancelling out thousands of votes in the process is terrible. The candidate with the most votes is Not guaranteed to win. Worse yet, Ranked Choice Voting is on the ballot as a charter amendment for Clark County this November! See PU4CC.info for details about all six proposed charter amendments that take away rights of residents.
The phrase “our democracy is at stake” is a common catch-phrase during this election. RCV is maybe the MOST important tool that democrats want to use to destroy our democracy.
Our democracy IS at stake… and the democrats are the ones of which to be afraid.
Am not going to tell you who to vote for… just DON’T vote democrat.