
The commission voted to recommend that the Legislature double the number of hours required to qualify for the benefit from 500 to 1,000 hours a year
On Tuesday, the Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Trust Commission held a meeting to vote on several recommended changes to the state’s new long-term care insurance program. Among the most controversial, the commission voted to recommend that the Legislature double the number of hours required to qualify for the benefit from 500 to 1,000 hours a year, a change Rep. Peter Abbarno says would make a bad program worse.
“Doubling the number of hours Washingtonians would have to work just to qualify for an already inadequate benefit is fundamentally unfair,” said Abbarno, Republican, 20th Legislative District. “This change would hurt many part-time and seasonal workers by forcing them to pay into a system they may never benefit from.”
On July 1, most workers in Washington, including part-time and temporary workers, began paying up to $0.58 per $100 of their earnings for the WA Cares Fund. The $36,500 benefit, including access to services and supports, will not be available to qualified, eligible individuals until July 2026.
In 2019, over the unanimous objections of House Republicans, Democrats passed House Bill 1087, establishing the Long-Term Care Services and Supports Program. Later that year, nearly 63% of Washington voters said the Legislature should repeal the payroll tax through Advisory Vote No. 20.
Abbarno listened to the voters and introduced House Bill 1594 (2021) and House Bill 1011 (2022) to repeal the program and payroll tax. Despite the overwhelming public disapproval of the payroll tax, neither bill received a committee hearing.
On April 3, 2023, during floor debate on the House Democrats’ 2023-25 operating budget (Senate Bill 5187), Abbarno offered Amendment 545 that would have repealed the program and payroll tax. House Democrats voted the amendment down.
“At a time when families in Washington are struggling to afford gas, groceries, housing, and childcare – those kitchen table issues that affect most of us – the last thing we need is state government creating more economic uncertainty,” said Abbarno. “This change would make a bad program worse.”
Learn more at: houserepublicans.wa.gov/repeal-ltc
Information provided by Washington State House Republicans
houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- The Study of Sports Podcast Dec. 30, 2025: A look ahead to 2026 with WIAA amendments, a year in review in high school sports, plus remembering the Mariners’ magical runThe latest Study of Sports Podcast looks ahead to proposed WIAA amendments, reviews high school sports in 2025, and reflects on the Seattle Mariners’ memorable run.
- Virginia Rodeman defies limits and wins No-Gi World Championship in Brazilian Jiu-JitsuBattle Ground athlete Virginia Rodeman won two divisions at the No-Gi World Championship in Las Vegas, continuing an eight-year rise in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu competition.
- Deportations, tariffs, court clashes, record shutdown mark a historic year in Washington, D.C.A year marked by deportations, tariffs, court battles, and a record federal shutdown reshaped Washington, D.C., during President Donald Trump’s return to office.
- Video: SCOTUS to take up key Second Amendment challenges in 2026The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear major Second Amendment cases in 2026 that could affect firearm regulations nationwide.
- County Council, Planning Commission to hold joint hearing on preferred land alternative for Comprehensive Plan UpdateClark County Council and the Planning Commission will hold a joint public hearing Jan. 8 to take testimony on a preferred land use alternative for the county’s Comprehensive Plan Update.
- Washougal School Board invites community to Jan. 13 listening tourThe Washougal School Board is hosting a community listening tour on Jan. 13 at Hathaway Elementary to discuss upcoming school funding levies and gather public input.
- Letter: When headlines gaslight the publicVancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that emotionally charged immigration headlines blur legal distinctions and mislead the public rather than inform it.








