CCFR: Revenue is not keeping up with service demands and costs to provide emergency services

Revenue from Clark-Cowlitz Fire Rescue’s fire levy is not keeping up with capital needs, increasing numbers of emergency incidents, and costs to provide service, the agency reports.
Clark-Cowlitz Fire Rescue Chief John Nohr is shown here. File photo

Board of Fire Commissioners to discuss fire levy lid lift April 25; public invited to attend and learn more

Revenue from Clark-Cowlitz Fire Rescue’s fire levy is not keeping up with capital needs, increasing numbers of emergency incidents, and costs to provide service.

The population within the CCFR response area has risen dramatically over the past decade, and so has demand for emergency services. Since 2017, CCFR call volumes have increased more than 40 percent. 

CCFR funds daily operations and capital purchases such as fire engines, ladder trucks, fire stations, and other equipment through a fire levy capped at $1.50 per $1,000 of assessed property value. CCFR has an emergency medical service (EMS) levy at $.47 per $1000 of assessed value that funds paramedic positions and pays for medical equipment and supplies.

In 2017, voters approved a fire levy rate of $1.50. Since then, it has dropped to $1.26. This is called “levy erosion” and impacts the fire district’s ability to provide service. The fire district is limited by state law to just a 1 percent revenue increase per year, while costs to provide emergency services increase nearly 6 percent each year.

CCFR used funding from the 2017 fire levy lid lift to add firefighter positions, reopen a shuttered fire station in Charter Oak, purchase property for a fire station in Ridgefield, purchase four fire engines and a ladder truck, and provide major maintenance on existing fire stations to extend their service life. These actions helped reduce the Washington Survey & Rating Bureau Protection Class Grade for CCFR from a 5 to a 4, thereby allowing for lower fire insurance rates for residents and businesses.

“CCFR has worked hard to use taxpayer dollars efficiently, while increasing the level of safety in our communities,” Fire Chief John Nohr said. “We have amazingly talented firefighters in this organization, but we are struggling to maintain response capability and capital purchases with the current fire levy.”

Commissioners considering a fire levy lid lift

Costs and demand for services are outpacing revenue. CCFR is discussing going to voters this year for a fire levy lid lift. The Board of Fire Commissioners is considering a $0.24 lid lift (from $1.26 to $1.50 per $1,000 of assessed property value) during the August 2024 primary election. The lid lift would fund:

  • Maintaining staffing levels of three firefighters at each fire station every day
  • Purchase of two fire engines and one water tender
  • Complete the construction of a partially built fire station in Woodland
  • Initiate construction of a new fire station in west Ridgefield
  • Fire station improvements at the Dollars Corner, Fairgrounds, La Center and Charter Oak facilities

The fire levy lid lift would cost the owner of a $500,000 home an additional $10 per month or $120 per year. 

The CCFR Board of Fire Commissioners will discuss placing a levy lid lift on the August ballot at its Thu., April 25 meeting, which the public is invited to attend and learn more. The meeting begins at 4 p.m. at Station 21, located at 911 N. 65th Avenue in Ridgefield. You can also attend virtually via Zoom. Find the link at www.clarkfr.org.

Clark-Cowlitz Fire Rescue (CCFR) serves 60,000 people over 125 square miles, including the cities of La Center, Ridgefield, Woodland, and the Cowlitz Indian Reservation. It’s combination department includes full-time and volunteer firefighters responding to an average of 5300 fire and emergency medical calls a year. CCFR operates under a balanced budget and has a history of passing independent financial audits by the state.


Also read:

2 Comments

  1. Susan

    Yadayadayada… “give us more and more money”

    In these days and times, before anyone’s request for more money is going to be even remotely considered, I need to hear facts as to what has been done to cut back on current costs.

    EVERY person I know in my circle of friends – retirees, working professionals, educated, blue collar – are all making hard decisions about where to cut back in their budgets in an effort to stretch their dollars.

    In the article, there are multiple references to the EXPANSION of current facilities and services, for which CCFR wants more money. Where are the examples of how they’ve attempted to stretch and better manage their current funds?

    Refurbish older equipment vs buying new?
    Making do with current stations instead of building new?
    Repair and maintain current engines vs buying new?

    It’s like government and budgets… there can be no belt-tightening; all monies must be fully spent and a deficit shown so that the need for MORE MONEY can be used to scare taxpayers into paying even more and more.

    Sorry, CCRF, but until I see a listing of belt-tightening steps that have been taken, and will be taken in the future, then the consideration of additional monies is a HARD NO.

    Reply
  2. Katherine

    I live on Larch Mountain & in 2022 the Nakia Creek fire came close to our community & home. District 3 Firefighters did a FANTASTIC JOB, no homes, lives or animals were lost!
    Second, my father has had some health issues & we had to call 911. District 3 firefighters are the 1st responders. EVERY SINGLE TIME they were amazing, polite, and respectful, they even had us laughing after being so worried! I can’t say enough great things about the men & women working for Fire & EMS.
    Many question why our Firefighters & EMS need this Levy lift (honestly they should have gotten the levy), many don’t understand, especially if you’ve never depended on Fire/EMS for services – personally I hope that day never comes. It did come for our community & family, I’m FOREVER GRATEFUL they were AVAILABLE!
    I can tell each & every person who has doubts about this funding, our Fire&EMS are qualified, skilled, trained professionals & THEY SAVE LIVES!
    Rejecting this Levy Lift would be a mistake.
    I ask my fellow Clark county residents to please take into consideration ALL OUR community, many of us live in rural areas & areas affected by Wildfires – District 3 Fire & EMS is often the first to respond to those of us living out here.
    I understand if you live in an urban neighborhood or city you may not think about this. Before the Nakia Creek fire our family never thought it was possible either! We have lived in our home for almost 30 years, & wildfires were NEVER a threat in our minds.
    Now we know differently. Urban areas are not exempt from harm – examples include Maui, many cities in CA. We are also Earthquake prone- who do you think will respond?
    It should not matter where a person lives- the city, suburb or a rural community we ALL NEED TO FEEL SECURE knowing our Fire/EMS can respond to ALL OF Clark County.
    For them to do so safely, due to the rapid growth within Clark County it’s more than fair that Fire & EMS get approval for the lift to obtain extra equipment, stations, staff, etc
    What is confusing to me is hearing arguments for a minimum wage increase, but wasting more transparency from the Fire Commissioner on where the money goes.
    As a long time resident of Clark County & voters always approving these in the past I ask people if they don’t see the growth & if they do vote this down a fair question should be how should Fire/EMS respond to emergencies?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *