Pushing COVID vax on children: Senseless lunacy

Exclusive: Joel S. Hirschhorn hammers public health establishment for jab propaganda
Exclusive: Joel S. Hirschhorn hammers public health establishment for jab propaganda

Exclusive: Joel S. Hirschhorn hammers public health establishment for jab propaganda

Joel S. Hirschhorn
WND News Center

The greatest failure of the public health establishment has arrived. Public revolt is now urgently needed.

Of all the many insane aspects of the pandemic, nothing compares to what is now going on: The federal government and public health establishment is pushing COVID vaccines for infants, young children and adolescents. Parents succumbing to this are either grossly uninformed or just plain victims of pro-vaccine propaganda.

Two key questions are paramount: Do infants and children really face such high COVID risks that they need vaccination? Are parents well-informed about the many known and unknown negative side effects of COVID vaccines?

All the vaccines being used in the U.S. have received emergency use authorization from the FDA. The question that deserves more attention is whether there is any legitimate emergency for non-adults from COVID. If CDC data are seriously examined, then the answer clearly is a resounding “no.” The lowest-risk part of the population for serious COVID illness are non-adults. They do not need vaccination if true science is followed.

A recent article noted these facts. Throughout the pandemic, children have represented about 19% of all COVID infections and represent about 22% of the U.S. population. There have thus far been 442 deaths from COVID in children 0-4 years. In early June, 2.7 children out of every 100,000 under the age of 5 years were hospitalized with COVID, a significant drop from January when the weekly prevalence was 15.3 of every 100,000. This rate is much lower than the estimated 1-2% risk of hospitalizations adults face. For children 5 to 18, there were 815 deaths as of June 2. Moreover, many children who get COVID have serious underlying medical conditions.

Then why are vaccines being pushed for non-adults? There is only one logical reason. To make even more money for vaccine manufacturers. And secondarily, for the government to maintain control of the population.

As the four shots received by Anthony Fauci have revealed, vaccines do not actually prevent getting COVID. Most transmission of COVID happens from the vaccinated and boosted. And a high fraction of the over 1 million American COVID deaths represent the vaccinated.

Yet another sad aspect of this lunacy is how nearly all physicians have succumbed to the pro-vaccine dogma and propaganda. Every parent with a doctor embracing vaccination of their children should question that doctor’s competence and independence.

Some very interesting data came from a Kaiser Family Foundation Covid-19 Vaccine Monitor poll released in May. There was actually some good news about parental sanity. Here are the key results. Just 18% of parents with children younger than 5 said they were eager to get the youngsters vaccinated immediately. More than a third of parents – 38% – said they planned to see how the vaccine works in other children, and especially significant, 27% reported they would “definitely not” have their children vaccinated. Eleven percent said they would do so if required. That raises the issue that many schools and other places may, indeed, require COVID vaccination of their students or attendees.

One of the pertinent issues parents should acknowledge is the prevalence of natural immunity that in every way is better and safer than vaccine immunity. In this regard, about 13.5 million children have tested positive for the virus, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics, offering them some protection against it.

Moreover, according to federal health data that analyzed blood tests, the number is even higher – by the end of February it showed that 3 out of 4 children nationwide had been infected with the coronavirus, giving them natural immunity and a very good reason not to get vaccinated. Are enough parents aware of this?

Also note that the pro-vaccine crowd is also pushing booster shots for children. There’s no end to the money-making insanity that grips the nation.

A study on parental intentions in Israel conducted by the Social Policy Institute at Washington University in St. Louis is worth noting. It found that among surveyed parents, only 37% intended to vaccinate their child (aged 5-11) against COVID-19 when the option became available, while 23% of parents were undecided, and 40% had no intention to vaccinate their children.

Child age, however, appears to make a difference in parents’ decision on vaccination. As children’s age increases, parents are more likely to intend to vaccinate them. Accordingly, intention to vaccinate children rises from 30% for children age 5 up to 46% for 11-year-old children. Child gender, on the other hand, does not matter.

If the pro-vaccine elites are victorious in vaccinating the nation’s infants and children, then shame on the nation and its medical and public health establishment.


Also read:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sylvia
Sylvia
1 month ago

Many would agree that the policy of ‘jabs first, questions later’ is medically unethical and irresponsible. It puts all of us at risk. It begs the question: do these institutions deserve our trust?
Stand for Health Freedom has shown courage, and deserves our gratitude in their response to FDA’s VRBPAC.
The FDA’s policy of shots first, questions later, most certainly does not allow for informed consent based on full disclosure of all data.
“On June 28, 2022, FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) met to vote on COVID strain replacement in the shots. Stand for Health Freedom was selected to make oral public comment at the meeting.”
The risk with blind obedience must be obvious to those who do not suffer from cognitive immobility.
To subject babies and children to the mRNA Covid19 jabs needs serious consideration in view of the risks – potential or rare risks still pose a risk that could affect anyone. Children’s immune system has not fully matured, and these jabs could potentially have unwanted effects on their development.

Melissa
Melissa
1 month ago
Reply to  Sylvia

Sylvia, you should consider providing written and/or spoken public comment during Clark County Board of Health Meetings! The next meeting is July 13. Written comment can be provided anytime prior to the meeting. Spoken can be in person or over the phone/computer. https://clark.wa.gov/councilors/board-health-87

Sylvia
Sylvia
1 month ago
Reply to  Melissa

Very tempting indeed! However, I would be wise to stay away from ‘political bodies’ or ‘body politics’. CHD (Children Health Defense) with Robert Kennedy JR is an excellent organization and would be perfect.
Thanks for the suggestion.

Melissa
Melissa
1 month ago

I think parents are wise to this issue. Looking at the Department of Health (DOH) data dashboard, only 2.4% of 6-month- thru 4-year-olds have begun the primary series. https://doh.wa.gov/emergencies/covid-19/data-dashboard (Click Panel: vaccinations, and Tabs: age, and who is getting vaccinated)

At the last Clark County Board of Health meeting, the director was lamenting the fact that childhood vaccines are down overall since covid. I suspect this is because public health has oversold and underdelivered with the covid shots. They come off looking like the promotional arm of the pharmaceutical industry, and it’s unseemly.

Sylvia
Sylvia
1 month ago
Reply to  Melissa

That is great and very promising! Thanks for sharing the stats.
I have been hoping that parents would objectively research the real risks of these jabs, and then consider whether they are prepared to subject children to jabs that could potentially have long-term negative impacts on an immune system that has not fully developed. To say “sorry” after irreversible damage is done is futile, as is living with guilt! The undeniable fact is that very little is known about these jabs – reassurances from MSM and many authorities are far from convincing. It is certainly safer to err on the side of caution rather than rush blindly along the road of no return. Scientists like Dr Robert Malone, Dr Peter McCullough, and many others have participated in a Senate Enquiry on the topic if the mRNA jabs.

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x