Clark County voters delivered a clear message in the April 22 special election, rejecting all three proposed tax measures. But what drove the outcome? From financial concerns to trust in government, we want to hear your perspective. Take this week’s poll and let us know what you believe was the biggest factor behind the no votes.
More info:
Voters reject tax proposals in April 22 special election
Clark County voters rejected all three tax measures on the April 22 special election ballot, including proposals in Camas, Washougal, Battle Ground, and Hockinson.
Read more
Also read:
- POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment. - Opinion: Olympia wants a 4-day work week. It won’t work out as the politicians think it will
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2611’s proposed 32-hour workweek would raise costs, strain small businesses, and undermine Washington’s economic competitiveness. - Opinion: The many reminders not to speed
Doug Dahl examines the many technological and policy-based reminders aimed at reducing speeding and explains why most drivers still choose not to use them voluntarily. - Opinion: Free care for people who don’t live here? It’s being encouraged — HB 2250 can help
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s current charity care rules encourage out-of-state use of non-emergency hospital services and supports HB 2250 to restore residency-based limits. - Opinion: Update on legislation to restore fairness and local control to transit governing boards and a bill to create accountability for the I-5 Bridge project
Rep. John Ley outlines the status of several bills addressing transit governance, accountability for the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project, criminal sentencing standards, and ongoing state responsibilities in his latest legislative update.
Government never, ever has enough money. They always want more and will make any excuse to get it. Voters have to understand this and vote appropriately….
The schools keep doubling down on things people don’t want for their kids (DEI teachings, certain health & LGBTQ curriculum, boys in girls sports, etc..) so this is a way to finally say no more money. Keep it up, and we will keep voting no. And keep wondering why enrollment is down along with test scores. One day is might click
I see every single day how much waste is in our schools. Money is not helping our schools. Teachers need to teach not do all these extra paperwork. so, so much waste!!!!
I am tired of higher taxes…make a plan make it work.
http://www.meritstreetmedia.com › show › dr-phil-primetimeF Is For Failure – meritstreetmedia.com
State government raising taxes to unaffordable levels without voter approval. Can’t afford more local tax increases.
I agree.Locals may have rejected the levy but my property tax assessment still includes
the two state assessments for “Sate Schools 1” plus “State Schools 2”.
Since we cannot vote for or against the State school property taxes will they simply
impose their will on the property owners and voters?
State Schools 1 and State Schools 2 are both for K-12 education, the state funds basic education.Voters input on State school taxes is thru elected representatives and Senators.
Local levies for K-12 schools go to voters for Extra curricular activities and other spending. I think the Treasurer and Assessor should add the description K-12 for State schools part 1 &2 and also for local levies. Our property tax bill can and should include as much detail as possible.