
In his recent opinion column, Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance takes a critical look at the $7.5 billion I-5 Bridge replacement project, raising key concerns about its impact and effectiveness. Many in the community question whether the current plan will truly reduce traffic congestion, while others believe the high cost is unjustified. The inclusion of TriMet’s light rail into Vancouver remains a controversial element, and some argue that a third Columbia River crossing would be a better long-term solution.
As the debate continues, we want to hear from you! What do you think is the biggest issue with the current plan? Vote in this week’s poll and make your voice heard!
More info:
Opinion: Hope for those of us looking for common sense on I-5 Bridge replacement project

Ken Vance discusses growing opposition to the $7.5 billion I-5 Bridge replacement project, highlighting concerns over tolling, traffic congestion, and funding priorities.
Read more
Also read:
- Washington looks to raise $1.6 billion from tolls for new I-5 bridgeWashington lawmakers are planning to raise billions through tolls to fund the new I-5 bridge connecting Washington and Oregon.
- Rep. John Ley issues statement after Marie Gluesenkamp Perez invites the USDOT Secretary to discuss the I-5 Bridge Replacement ProjectRep. John Ley criticizes the I-5 Bridge project, arguing it prioritizes transit over reducing congestion and saving time.
- Billboards make their argument for tunnel instead of bridgeBillboards in Portland urge leaders to consider an immersed tube tunnel as an alternative to the costly Interstate Bridge Replacement Project.
- Ramp meters bringing quicker commute times to I-205 in Clark County, Feb. 11WSDOT activates the final ramp meter on I-205, aiming to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion.
- Rep. John Ley introduces bill to save Washington transportation up to $500 millionRep. John Ley introduces House Bill 1869 to block Washington from funding out-of-state transportation projects, potentially saving up to $500 million.