New agreements with affected river users move the I-5 Bridge project closer to a fixed-span design, raising questions about whether 116 feet of clearance is the right solution
Oregon and Washington transportation officials have signed agreements with the four river users identified as impacted by the proposed 116-foot fixed-span I-5 Bridge replacement, clearing a major hurdle as the project heads to the U.S. Coast Guard for review. Supporters say the taller fixed span would eliminate the only “stoplight” on I-5 between Canada and Mexico, improve reliability, and avoid the higher construction and long-term maintenance costs associated with a movable bridge. The agreements — totaling $140 million, paid only if the Coast Guard approves the design and construction begins — are intended to address economic impacts to river users and demonstrate project readiness. With the Coast Guard’s decision expected in early 2026, this week’s poll asks: is a 116-foot fixed span the right choice for the I-5 replacement?
More info:
Agreements reached with four river users identified as impacted by proposed I-5 Bridge replacement
Also read:
- Opinion: Simultaneous left turns
Doug Dahl explains how Washington law directs drivers to make simultaneous left turns by passing to the left of each other in an intersection. - Judge grants C-TRAN injunction against WSDOT
A judge ruled that WSDOT cannot withhold grants from C-TRAN while the agency’s board composition review process continues. - Opinion: TriMet’s fiscal cliff continues to be a warning to Clark County and Oregon residentsRep. John Ley’s opinion column details TriMet’s worsening finances, warning Clark County residents about the risks of any financial ties to the transit agency.
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s ridiculous rampBob Ortblad critiques the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s latest shared use path ramp design and questions the purpose and cost of the project.
- Opinion: Why you can’t bribe your way to a low fixed span bridgeJoe Cortright argues that the Coast Guard is unlikely to approve the IBR’s proposed 116-foot fixed span, citing longstanding navigation requirements and past conflicts over river clearance.
