POLL: Do you support a third Columbia River bridge without light rail or tolls?

Poll asks whether a toll-free, no–light rail East County Bridge should move forward as a practical alternative to the $7.5 billion I-5 Bridge replacement.
Poll asks whether a toll-free, no–light rail East County Bridge should move forward as a practical alternative to the $7.5 billion I-5 Bridge replacement.

A proposed East County Bridge would offer new traffic lanes and pedestrian paths without tolls or light rail — but would it move the region forward?

The idea of an East County Bridge—positioned east of the I-205 Glenn Jackson Bridge near 192nd Avenue—has resurfaced as a more affordable, common-sense alternative to the $7.5 billion I-5 Bridge replacement project. Proposed without tolls or light rail, the East County Bridge would add much-needed capacity and a new freight corridor between Clark County and Oregon. Supporters say it’s a faster, more practical solution to regional congestion. Opponents argue light rail and tolling must be part of the long-term plan.

POLL: Do you support a third Columbia River bridge without light rail or tolls?*
1014 votes

This poll is no longer accepting votes

More info:


Also read:

7 Comments

    1. Andee

      How do you pay for more bridges and what do you connect to? A new I-5 bridge will do little to relieve congestion which is worse every day with the increasing amount of crashes. Many vehicles only have just the driver. There needs to be a viable source of transportation to get people quickly to major areas across the river. Light rail is the most reliable and works well in many areas.

      Reply
      1. Bob Link

        Light rail may be reliable but it will not solve the problem. All you have to do is Look @ rush hour any day or lunch hour on a Friday. All those folks have different destinations and are not going to take a rail ride to Portland then find their way on to their destination.

        Reply
  1. Dan Bower

    East county is a poor choice, one already exists, it’s called I-205. What is needed is a west county belt route, feeding to Beaverton/ Hillsboro and around towards Wilsonville, similarly to how the I-205 operstes. Do that, and congestion will be equalized, and you’ll find with a parallel distribution networked roadway, life will become manageable regarding commuter frustration.

    I believe this should be the priority, not the I-5 bridge. That is an absurd project, ot leads nowhere regarding reducing the congestion. Both North and South ends are not expandable with out imminent domain of thousands of properties. Furthermore. The bridge overpass network would have to be completely revamped to support more traffic.

    Reply
  2. Alden Phillips

    I believe an east county and a west county bridge would reduce traffic on the I5 and 205 bridges.The goal should be giving drivers the option to bypass Portland instead of having to drive thru it.Light rail at a billion per mile should not be considered. Clark County IS NOT a part of the Portland Metro area and should not be treated as such. Clark County is in Washington State not Oregon.

    Reply
  3. M DeMay

    Your poll is disingenuous. To group together tolls and light rail, your poll was designed to get the results you “achieved”. Go to any successful country, anywhere in the world, and you will find a public transportation system that helps all citizens in many ways.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *