As discussions about the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project move forward, TriMet’s demands for light rail have sparked debate. In a recent story, bridge management defended TriMet’s position, arguing that light rail is essential for the region’s future. While some agree that it will improve public transportation and reduce congestion, others argue that expanding vehicle lanes or even adding a third bridge would be more effective. You can read the full story here. Now, we want to know your thoughts—take this week’s poll and let us know if you believe TriMet’s demands are justified.
More info:
Bridge management defends TriMet’s excessive demands for project
TriMet ridership remains far below pre-pandemic levels, showing a slow recovery after lockdowns decimated usage.
Read more
Also read:
- As summer days approach more construction comes to area roadways
A worker was struck and thrown 20 feet by a distracted driver in a Clark County work zone last summer. - Opinion: Transportation officials may be pivoting as costs explode on interstate bridge replacement
Rail’s share of the I-5 bridge budget may be far larger than the 14% figure officials are citing. - Opinion: IBR program’s $13-17 billion fraud and mismanagement, perpetuated by Vancouver Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle and Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek
Gary Clark argues IBR hid a $17B cost estimate from lawmakers while spending up to $280M with no public benefit. - Opinion: The IBR shell game for TriMet at Ruby Junction
IBR allocates $320M for a TriMet maintenance facility 20 miles from the actual bridge project. - Washington and Oregon transportation commissions discuss tolling options
I-5 tolls could range from $1.55 to $4.70 depending on the plan, with final rates set in late 2027.
wpDiscuz
