As discussions about the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project move forward, TriMet’s demands for light rail have sparked debate. In a recent story, bridge management defended TriMet’s position, arguing that light rail is essential for the region’s future. While some agree that it will improve public transportation and reduce congestion, others argue that expanding vehicle lanes or even adding a third bridge would be more effective. You can read the full story here. Now, we want to know your thoughts—take this week’s poll and let us know if you believe TriMet’s demands are justified.
More info:
Bridge management defends TriMet’s excessive demands for project
TriMet ridership remains far below pre-pandemic levels, showing a slow recovery after lockdowns decimated usage.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Stop rewarding fiscal mismanagement on the IBR; enough is enough
Rep. John Ley argues the $15.2B IBR project is underfunded, years behind schedule, and should strip out its $3.5B transit component. - Letter: Reinstate Councilor Belkot!
Camas resident Anna Miller argues Belkot was removed before any written rule required councilors to follow the majority’s voting instructions. - POLL: Do the Clark County Council’s new Rules of Procedure suggest Michelle Belkot’s 2025 removal from the C-TRAN board was handled improperly?
Clark County Today asks readers if new council rules suggest Belkot’s 2025 C-TRAN removal lacked proper authority. - Opinion: Wildfire risk demands a more flexible approach to roadless areas
Washington Policy Center’s Todd Myers supports rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule to give local forest managers more flexibility to reduce catastrophic wildfire risk. - Opinion: A school bus, a four-way stop, and the meaning of ‘either’
Doug Dahl explains why the word “either” in state law means cross-traffic at a four-way stop may not be required to stop for a school bus.
wpDiscuz
