As discussions about the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project move forward, TriMet’s demands for light rail have sparked debate. In a recent story, bridge management defended TriMet’s position, arguing that light rail is essential for the region’s future. While some agree that it will improve public transportation and reduce congestion, others argue that expanding vehicle lanes or even adding a third bridge would be more effective. You can read the full story here. Now, we want to know your thoughts—take this week’s poll and let us know if you believe TriMet’s demands are justified.
More info:
Bridge management defends TriMet’s excessive demands for project
TriMet ridership remains far below pre-pandemic levels, showing a slow recovery after lockdowns decimated usage.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: TriMet Better Red cost allocation revealed
John Ley examines TriMet’s $204 million Better Red project, showing most of the spending wasn’t on vehicles or tracks—raising questions about cost transparency and regional funding. - Opinion: Neighbors for a Better Crossing calls for a current seismic study for $7.5 Billion Interstate Bridge project
Neighbors for a Better Crossing is urging a new seismic study before construction proceeds on the $7.5 billion IBR project, raising transparency concerns and proposing an immersed tube tunnel alternative. - Rep. John Ley supports C-TRAN Bus Rapid Transit to save Washington moneyRep. John Ley praised C-TRAN’s new BRT line as a faster, lower-cost alternative to light rail, urging support for transit options that save taxpayers money and improve service.
- C-TRAN, WSU Vancouver celebrates groundbreaking for The Vine on Highway 99C-TRAN and WSU Vancouver broke ground on the Vine’s Highway 99 route, a 9-mile bus rapid transit line connecting the university to downtown Vancouver and the Waterfront, set to open in 2027.
- C-TRAN board again postpones vote on light rail operations and maintenance costsThe C-TRAN board again postponed a vote on language regarding operations and maintenance costs tied to light rail expansion, with pending lawsuits involving Michelle Belkot continuing to impact board actions.
An additional bridge. No light rail. Existing bridge could be used as a partial pedestrian/bile only crossing to encourage commuting by bike and maybe an additional lane for low speed small motorized bikes, scooters ect.. 🚴
For 5 years we have attended the IBR meetings of smoke & mirror incompetent information. Each proposal was a presentation of incompetence. A clear picture of Oregon leadership dysfunction for the last 10 years of the destruction of Portland. Criminals are protected & rewarded, No thief arrested , extreme abuse of elderly , IGNORED. The corruption of Portland must end. The ONLY decision to alleviate the terrible traffic congestion is a THIRD bridge. There are 7 bridges over the Willamette.