As discussions about the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project move forward, TriMet’s demands for light rail have sparked debate. In a recent story, bridge management defended TriMet’s position, arguing that light rail is essential for the region’s future. While some agree that it will improve public transportation and reduce congestion, others argue that expanding vehicle lanes or even adding a third bridge would be more effective. You can read the full story here. Now, we want to know your thoughts—take this week’s poll and let us know if you believe TriMet’s demands are justified.
More info:
Bridge management defends TriMet’s excessive demands for project
TriMet ridership remains far below pre-pandemic levels, showing a slow recovery after lockdowns decimated usage.
Read more
Also read:
- VIDEO: Rep. John Ley – I-5 Bridge replacement project is a ‘light rail project in search of a bridge’
Rep. John Ley criticizes IBR design that allocates 54% of bridge surface to transit while costs balloon to $14.4 billion. - Letter: IBR/Light rail and chronic homelessness
Vancouver resident Bob Zak criticizes city council’s light rail endorsement and calls for tougher homeless policies. - Opinion: Crashes, crime, and confusion – Who’s responsible in parking lots?
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl explains why police rarely patrol grocery store parking lots and what drivers can do. - POLL: Should Clark County’s 2022 anti-light rail resolution still guide council decisions today?
Wednesday’s council meeting reignited debate over the county’s 2022 resolution requiring voter approval for light rail projects. - Letter: Update – Extremely low bus ridership does not justify expensive TriMet light rail
Camas resident challenges IBR’s $3.5 billion light rail plan with C-TRAN ridership data showing transit use has halved since 2006.
wpDiscuz
