As discussions about the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project move forward, TriMet’s demands for light rail have sparked debate. In a recent story, bridge management defended TriMet’s position, arguing that light rail is essential for the region’s future. While some agree that it will improve public transportation and reduce congestion, others argue that expanding vehicle lanes or even adding a third bridge would be more effective. You can read the full story here. Now, we want to know your thoughts—take this week’s poll and let us know if you believe TriMet’s demands are justified.
More info:
Bridge management defends TriMet’s excessive demands for project
TriMet ridership remains far below pre-pandemic levels, showing a slow recovery after lockdowns decimated usage.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: A-pillars – The safety feature that increases crashes
Doug Dahl explains how wider A-pillars designed to protect occupants in rollovers may also reduce visibility and increase crash risk for other road users. - Opinion: Interstate Bridge replacement – the forever project
Joe Cortright argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project could bring tolling and traffic disruptions on I-5 through the mid-2040s. - Opinion: Oversized tires and the frequency illusion
Doug Dahl explains why tires that extend beyond fenders are illegal and how frequency illusion shapes perceptions about traffic safety. - Opinion: IBR’s systematic disinformation campaign, its demise
Neighbors for a Better Crossing challenges IBR’s seismic claims and promotes a reuse-and-tunnel alternative they say would save billions at the I-5 crossing. - Opinion: Is a state income tax coming, and the latest on the I-5 Bridge project
Rep. John Ley shares a legislative update on a proposed state income tax, the I-5 Bridge project, the Brockmann Campus and House Bill 2605.
wpDiscuz
