
Proposed rule changes follow controversy over a 2025 board removal and raise new questions about council authority
The Clark County Council is considering changes to its Rules of Procedure after a contentious 2025 decision to remove Councilor Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN Board of Directors — a move that led to lawsuits and a criminal investigation. During a recent council discussion, members acknowledged that key procedures, including whether the council could direct votes or remove a councilor from a board, were not clearly written at the time. Now, with proposed language aimed at clarifying that authority going forward, the debate has shifted to a central question: do these changes suggest the council lacked that authority last year?
More info:
Do the County Council’s proposed changes to Rules of Procedure prove Belkot was correct?
Clark County Council discussions about rewriting its Rules of Procedure raise new questions about whether Michelle Belkot’s removal from the C-TRAN board last year lacked...
Read more
Also read:
- 49th Legislative District Democrats share their reasons for backing state income tax at Town HallThree Democrat legislators defended the new income tax affecting only those earning over $1 million annually.
- Letter: Freeze the scope and build the bridgeVancouver resident calls for project discipline after 22 years of planning and nearly half a billion in costs.
- Opinion: Public workers’ First Amendment rights are getting attention – in Idaho, not WashingtonIdaho moves to stop public schools from collecting union dues through government payroll while Washington continues favoring unions over worker choice.
- Opinion: Lawsuit filed against the unconstitutional income tax in Washington stateFormer Attorney General Rob McKenna and Supreme Court Justice Phil Talmadge challenge the 9.9% income tax in Klickitat Superior Court.
- Letter: ‘Oregon and Washington aren’t refusing to clean their rolls — they’re contesting federal jurisdiction and timing’Camas resident challenges Lars Larson’s fraud claims, explaining legal disputes over federal jurisdiction.







