
Council’s 3-2 vote on ICE resolution sparks heated exchanges, emotional public comment, and disagreement over the county’s role
The Clark County Council voted 3-2 to move forward with a modified resolution addressing federal immigration enforcement activities, but not before more than an hour of intense public comment and a lengthy debate among councilors. Some anti-ICE activists said the language did not go far enough, while several law enforcement supporters argued the resolution risks dividing the community. Councilors also clashed over jurisdiction, racial profiling language, support for local law enforcement, and whether the county should “condemn” or simply say it is “alarmed” by reported ICE tactics. As the resolution heads toward a formal reading at the Feb. 17 meeting, we want to know: Did this debate and decision help unite Clark County — or deepen divisions?
More info:
Clark County Council modifies language on its resolution on ICE activities in the region
Also read:
- Opinion: Study shows 2025’s record tax increases reduce Washington’s GDP growth and worker payTodd Myers writes that a new economic analysis projects Washington’s 2025 tax increases will slow GDP growth and reduce wages over the next several years.
- WA Senate narrowly advances bill to reduce education spending by $176M through 2031The Washington Senate passed a bill by a 25-24 vote that would reduce and delay some education funding to help address the state’s budget shortfall.
- Legislation from Rep. David Stuebe to strengthen Medicaid support for emergency ambulance services moves closer to becoming lawA bill from Rep. David Stuebe updating Medicaid reimbursement for emergency ambulance services passed the Senate and now heads to the governor’s desk.
- WA governor: Passage of income tax could slip to 2027Gov. Bob Ferguson warned Washington lawmakers may need until 2027 to finalize a proposed tax on income above $1 million as negotiations continue over how to use the revenue.
- Letter: The Missing Skamania Report – The prosecuting attorney is still sitting on itRob Anderson questions why an investigative report into potential County Charter and OPMA violations has not received an outside review after being declined by multiple offices.







