Leslie Lewallen says ‘the money won’t follow failure — and neither will the trust of the people’
Editor’s note: These opinions belong to Leslie Lewallen personally, and are not a reflection of the Camas City Council.
Leslie Lewallen
for Clark County Today
The homelessness crisis has devastated communities across Washington—morally, socially, and financially. As a Camas City Councilmember, I’ve seen firsthand the toll this crisis takes on families, businesses, and our local budgets. Municipalities are being stretched to the breaking point—forced to divert millions in taxpayer resources toward emergency responses, encampment cleanups, public safety calls, and homelessness-related medical and fire emergencies.
In Camas, like cities across Southwest Washington, our local police and fire departments have seen rising call volumes tied directly to untreated addiction and homeless encampments—fires started for warmth, medical calls for overdoses, and vandalism of public spaces. These aren’t isolated incidents — they are the natural consequence of a system that continues to fund failure under the guise of “compassion.”
We need to face facts: the “housing first” model without accountability has not worked. It was well-intentioned, but it has too often become a revolving door — placing individuals in temporary housing with little to no expectations for sobriety, treatment, or long-term stability. It’s a one-size-fits-all approach that ignores the reality that addiction and untreated mental illness are the root causes of chronic homelessness.
Now, a new federal executive order is holding cities accountable — and Washington isn’t ready. The order ties funding from critical agencies like HUD, HHS, DOT, and DOJ to cities and states that prioritize enforcement. That means: no more tolerance for open-air drug use, no more permanent encampments, and no more harm-reduction programs that enable addiction without requiring treatment.
What’s at stake? A lot.
Washington could lose tens of millions in homelessness response grants, addiction recovery funds, and criminal justice diversion programs. But what hasn’t been talked about enough is how much our infrastructure projects could also suffer.
Why? Because federal transportation funding is now tied to public safety. Transit hubs and large infrastructure projects — like the $7.5 billion Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) between Vancouver and Portland — are magnets for encampments, open-air drug use, and public safety concerns. The feds have made it clear: if we want their investment, we have to show we can keep those spaces safe and clean.
So far, the IBR has secured more than $2.1 billion in federal funding, including a $1.5 billion grant. But over $500 million in additional funds are still on the table — and Washington’s failure to enforce its own laws could put it all at risk.
This isn’t theoretical. Under Governor Ferguson’s leadership, we’ve seen a rollback of enforcement priorities, despite a $12 billion budget deficit. Encampment resolution programs have been slashed, and cities like Olympia and Tacoma continue to deprioritize drug enforcement. Meanwhile, the same state leaders are pushing forward with a light rail expansion as part of the IBR, even though it invites further public safety challenges and increases long-term maintenance costs.
Whether or not you support President Trump, his administration’s latest move to condition funding on enforcement is a wake-up call. There can be no more blank checks for broken systems.
I believe in compassionate care — but compassion without accountability is chaos. We need a system that supports recovery, not dependency. Temporary shelter with treatment requirements. Pathways to sobriety. Real consequences for lawbreaking behavior.
The message from Washington, D.C. is clear: Reform or lose funding. Accountability or decline. We owe it to our neighbors, our families, and our future to choose the path of responsible compassion — not blind tolerance.
The money won’t follow failure — and neither will the trust of the people.
Also read:
- Opinion: Two ways to keep right
Doug Dahl explains how Washington drivers must “keep right” differently depending on whether traffic flows in one direction or both, plus the exceptions that apply to two-way turn lanes. - Opinion: A troubling end to a disruptive session
Let’s Go Washington highlights multiple instances where legislative leaders dismissed historic public feedback, advanced controversial tax policies, and undermined constituent influence. - Opinion: Washington state is blowing up its no-income-tax advantage
Lawmakers advanced SB 6346 with an emergency clause, aiming to end Washington’s no-income-tax reputation and prevent voters from seeking a referendum. - Opinion: Labor to hit households
Households hiring for childcare or cleaning may soon need formal contracts due to a Washington law extending workplace rules to domestic arrangements. - POLL: What do you think will happen if Washington’s new income tax becomes law?
A new poll asks Clark County Today readers to predict what will happen if Washington’s nearly 10% tax on high incomes becomes law.
