Advocates are facing a daunting history of 10 straight rejections at the ballot box for income taxes

David Boze
Washington Policy Center

Ten times since 1934, Washington voters have said no to any kind of income taxes, including those targeting the wealthiest among us.  Will it soon be 11? 

The effort to repeal the newly-instituted income tax on capital gains advanced today with the certification of more than enough signatures to make it to the ballot. The first stop though, is the state legislature where the legislative majority is expected to do nothing. That action (or inaction) will send it to the voters in the fall.  

Advocates are facing a daunting history of 10 straight rejections at the ballot box for income taxes. 

But this time, they have an advantage.

Despite the IRS confirming a capital gains tax is an income tax and despite every other state in the union and several other countries confirming they treat capital gains taxes as income taxes because … well, it’s the taxing of a form of income, the Washington State Supreme Court legitimized this political version of “Freaky Friday” and allowed Washington’s income tax on capital gains to become an “excise tax on capital gains.” This is an advantage unprecedented in the history of Washington’s income tax votes. Instead of being faced with truth in labeling, advocates will claim no “income tax” is on the line. I can imagine media sources “fact checking” opponents who call it an “income tax” and more.

Washington voters earned the right to decide — they also deserve an honest debate, 

David Boze is the communications director at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Letter: ‘One year later, a withheld text message points to perjury’
  Clark County resident Rob Anderson argues a previously undisclosed text message tied to a C-TRAN board dispute raises questions about sworn statements and public meeting rules.
• 
  Opinion: It’s not just the increased taxes that are driving businesses away
  Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center argues taxes, workforce challenges and economic uncertainty are driving businesses to relocate outside Washington.
• 
  Opinion: There is no such thing as a ‘free’ lunch, and an income tax isn’t more palatable because it offers one
  Elizabeth New of the Washington Policy Center argues the proposed Washington income tax and universal school meals policy reflect a broader state spending problem
• 
  Opinion: Democrat Party penalizes marriage in Washington
  Lars Larson argues that Washington’s newly passed income tax unfairly targets married couples by creating what he describes as a financial penalty for filing jointly.
• 
  Opinion: Gov. Ferguson has abandoned his own tax relief demands
  Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that Gov. Bob Ferguson’s support for the state’s proposed income tax contradicts his earlier demands for broader taxpayer relief.