Advocates are facing a daunting history of 10 straight rejections at the ballot box for income taxes

David Boze
Washington Policy Center

Ten times since 1934, Washington voters have said no to any kind of income taxes, including those targeting the wealthiest among us.  Will it soon be 11? 

The effort to repeal the newly-instituted income tax on capital gains advanced today with the certification of more than enough signatures to make it to the ballot. The first stop though, is the state legislature where the legislative majority is expected to do nothing. That action (or inaction) will send it to the voters in the fall.  

Advocates are facing a daunting history of 10 straight rejections at the ballot box for income taxes. 

But this time, they have an advantage.

Despite the IRS confirming a capital gains tax is an income tax and despite every other state in the union and several other countries confirming they treat capital gains taxes as income taxes because … well, it’s the taxing of a form of income, the Washington State Supreme Court legitimized this political version of “Freaky Friday” and allowed Washington’s income tax on capital gains to become an “excise tax on capital gains.” This is an advantage unprecedented in the history of Washington’s income tax votes. Instead of being faced with truth in labeling, advocates will claim no “income tax” is on the line. I can imagine media sources “fact checking” opponents who call it an “income tax” and more.

Washington voters earned the right to decide — they also deserve an honest debate, 

David Boze is the communications director at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: The growing gap between public voice and political power
  Todd Myers describes how large-scale protest and sign-ins often fail to sway state leaders, and argues authentic influence is most likely found through local action.
• 
  Opinion: Who is winning the race for affordable power?
  Hydroelectric power keeps Washington competitive, but new laws and carbon pricing are driving up electricity costs for residents each year.
• 
  Opinion: Half the road, full stop – Understanding pedestrian right-of-way
  Doug Dahl explains how Washington’s law requires drivers to stop when a pedestrian is within one lane of their half of the road, not just when directly in front.
• 
  Opinion: The state’s RFK-proofing bill comes with a cost
  Mandates like HB 2242 can lead to higher premiums as insurance companies absorb costs for new preventive services, affecting affordability statewide.
• 
  Opinion: What is the cost of a bridge?
  John Ley argues the I-5 Bridge replacement’s soaring cost stems from costly extras like light rail, noting other states deliver larger, toll-free bridges for much less.