
Doug Dahl answers a question about what drivers should do during a power outage
Doug Dahl
The Wise Drive
Q: Yesterday, my neighborhood had a power outage. The traffic light nearby was impacted and had no power. I believe the rule is that you treat a dead traffic light like a stop sign. I was surprised to see everyone I came across treating it like a green light and proceeding through at almost normal speed, even though I was waiting at the intersection. Am I missing something?
A: As someone completely unqualified to make any sort of psychological assessment, I’m going to do it anyway. Years ago in an intro to psychology class I learned about the fight, flight, or freeze responses to stress. And maybe that’s what you’re observing. Specifically, the freeze response.

Fight and flight are both decisive responses. I’m not sure how you’d fight a traffic signal in a blackout, but flight would be an option; you could decide to turn around and go home (or whatever route avoided traffic signals). Freeze, though, is an indecisive response. When you’re caught off guard by the unexpected situation of a dark traffic signal it triggers a bit of anxiety. You don’t know what to do, so you don’t do anything. And since your car is already traveling toward the intersection, you freeze up and let your car keep going.
Or maybe the other drivers on the road with you that day were a bunch of jerks. But I tend to subscribe to Hanlon’s Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance.
It’s power outage season. Last week’s bomb cyclone left over a half a million people in western Washington in the dark, so I suspect that many folks encountered similar situations. Fortunately, the law gives drivers directions on how to handle a non-functioning traffic signal. You’re correct in your belief; you treat it as an all-way stop. After stopping, yield to drivers already in the intersection, and if two drivers arrive at the same time, the one on the left yields to the one on the right.
In the interest of self-preservation though, I’d recommend a heightened sense of caution. As you experienced, when the driving environment deviates from the norm, not everyone acts predictably.
I mentioned earlier the unexpected situation of dark traffic signals. But really, it shouldn’t be unexpected. We had forecasts predicting the weather we got. And we should know the potential hazards that show up in bad weather.
So here’s my suggestion to all those folks that were on the road with you when the power was out. When you grab your car keys, consider the weather and ask yourself some relevant questions. Last week you might have asked, “What do I do if the traffic signals are dark? What do I do if there’s a power line on the road? What do I do if my car starts hydroplaning? What do I do if I’m stuck with a bunch of other drivers who didn’t ask themselves these questions before driving off into the storm?”
I remember thinking to myself when I first started driving, “It’s crazy that we’re allowed to drive a multi-ton projectile at 70 mph just a few feet away from someone else doing the same thing.” Once you’ve been driving for a while though, it’s easy to be lulled by miles of uneventful driving into believing it’s a mundane task that doesn’t require much attention. But storms and power outages are a reminder that a routine trip can quickly become non-routine. With a little bit of forethought we can anticipate how the weather might change our drive, so even if the roads freeze up, we won’t.
The Wise Drive is hosted by Doug Dahl, a Target Zero manager for the Washington Traffic Safety Commission.
Also read:
- Opinion: A year in review of news stories from a former sports guyClark County Today reporter Paul Valencia reflects on his evolving role, revisiting major news, community debates, sports moments, and human-interest stories that shaped Clark County in 2025.
- Opinion: Ready for another pay decrease from the state? It happens Jan. 1Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave payroll tax increase will further reduce workers’ take-home pay beginning Jan. 1.
- Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund itNancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them.
- Letter: When headlines gaslight the publicVancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that emotionally charged immigration headlines blur legal distinctions and mislead the public rather than inform it.
- Opinion: California’s unemployment debt crisis mirrors Washington’s Employment Security Department failuresMark Harmsworth compares California’s growing unemployment insurance debt with Washington’s Employment Security Department failures and argues both states must reform or risk continued economic harm.







