Opinion: Washington state auditor identifies 62 federal audit findings against Washington agencies

Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center points out that many of the violations were with accounting and use of federal COVID relief funds

Jason Mercier
Washington Policy Center

The state auditor today released Washington’s “Financial Statements and Federal Single Audit Report” covering agency compliance with federal rules in 2021. The state auditor identified 62 violations, several dealing with accounting and use of federal COVID relief funds. According to the report:

“We issued an adverse opinion on the state’s compliance with requirements applicable to the 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund, 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families programs.”

Here is a sampling of the 62 audit findings:

“The State lacked adequate internal controls over financial reporting for ensuring accurate recording and monitoring of financial activity in its financial statements.”
“The Department of Social and Health Services did not have adequate internal controls to ensure payments were allowable and properly supported, and did not comply with federal requirements to conduct fiscal monitoring of subrecipients for the Coronavirus Relief Fund.”
“The Department of Commerce did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to conduct fiscal monitoring of subrecipients and ensure payments were allowable and properly supported for the Coronavirus Relief Fund.”
“The Office of Financial Management did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with reporting requirements for the Coronavirus Relief Fund.”
“The Department of Commerce did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Coronavirus Relief Fund received risk assessments.”
“Washington State University did not establish adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to conduct risk assessments of student information security for the Student Financial Assistance programs.”
“The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to subrecipients were adequately supported for the Special Education programs.”
“The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to perform risk assessments for subrecipients of the Education Stabilization Fund programs.”
“The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with financial reporting requirements for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster.”
“The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal provider eligibility requirements for the Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance programs.”