Washington’s ranking at 32 rests on issues around government efficiency (ranked 33rd) and regulatory freedom (40)
Chris Corry
Washington Policy Center
Pullman Washington-based Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories published their 2023 Index of Freedom report. SEL is a global leader in creating products that protect, control, and automate power grids worldwide.
The report ranks all 50 states based on government efficiency, regulatory freedom, and energy resiliency. The top-performing states for 2023 were Utah, South Dakota, North Dakota, Idaho and Nevada. New Jersey, California, Maine, Vermont, and New York were the worst-performing states. Washington came in at 32 on the list (an improvement from 36 in 2022).
The report’s methodology for government efficiency, regulatory freedom, and energy resiliency breaks down multiple source reports on a weighted basis. For example, in energy resiliency, the report uses the Citizens Utility Board and EPA reports for affordability rankings (45%), reliability rankings (45%), and electric deregulation (10%).
The SEL report focuses on states where they have physical operations, including Washington, Idaho, Indiana, North Carolina, and Arizona.
Washington’s ranking at 32 rests on issues around government efficiency (ranked 33rd) and regulatory freedom (40). The state ranked 8th in energy resiliency.
The report notes:
“Washington suffers from a challenging regulatory climate and poor labor rates, driven by some of the most progressive prevailing wage and minimum wage laws in the nation. While Washington has been buoyed by a lack of a personal income tax, a newly implemented 7 percent capital gains tax sets a dangerous and highly irregular precedent, as the Washington State Supreme Court characterized this tax as an excise tax and not an income tax, as does the IRS and every other state in the country. This ruling opened the door for more bad tax policy in the state.”
Washington’s energy resiliency score bolsters the state’s overall ranking with robust, reliable, affordable hydroelectric power. The report warns of the negative impacts of attempts to lessen or remove this critical power source.
Washington falls short compared to Idaho, which ranked 4th overall. The state has improved overall due to a change in the state’s income tax to a flat tax on personal and corporate income. This also included rebates back to citizens. They also lead the nation in regulatory freedom, which has led to robust growth in the state. The report notes that energy resiliency has suffered because of reliability, which can harm businesses.
You can find the entire report here.
Chris Corry is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: Washington’s fight for liberty
Conservative columnist Nancy Churchill argues that despite the passage of a new 9.9% state income tax, signs of shifting political momentum in Washington state give reason for hope and continued action. - Opinion: Brandi Kruse and I are feeling discouraged but we’re planning to continue advocating for political change. Will you?
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a discouraging week in Washington state politics, echoing Brandi Kruse’s frustrations over Democrats’ state income tax victory and local decisions on transit and ICE while urging conservatives not to give up on advocating for political change. - Opinion: ‘My thoughts on yesterday’s tragic state income tax’
Leslie Lewallen argues Democrats passed an unconstitutional “millionaires tax” on March 10, 2026, rejected more than 70 Republican amendments, and set Washington on a path she says will harm jobs, schools, and families statewide. - Opinion: Starbucks founder flees the new NW tax hell
Lars Larson argues that Howard and Sheri Schultz are leaving the Pacific Northwest for Miami following Washington’s new millionaires tax and rapid state budget growth in Oregon and Washington. - Letter: ‘One year later, a withheld text message points to perjury’
Clark County resident Rob Anderson argues a previously undisclosed text message tied to a C-TRAN board dispute raises questions about sworn statements and public meeting rules.
