Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center points out that the results of a high artificial minimum wage are exactly the opposite of the proponents desired result
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
Washington State Labor and Industries (L&I) has announced that 2023 minimum wage rate will be set at $15.74 which is a $1.25 increase over 2022.
In a press release on the L&I website, the agency attributes the 8.66% increase to change in “the cost of common goods such as housing, food, and medical care as reflected in the Consumer Price Index.”
According to minimum-wage.org, Washington will have the highest statewide minimum wage in the country. The highest minimum wage in the nation, including municipalities that can set their own rates, is in Washington state, Sea Tac at $17.53 followed by Seattle at $17.27.
The federal minimum wage is $7.25.
Increasing the minimum wage to such a high level destroys jobs, reduces available work hours and causes inflation. Businesses will often relocate away from areas that have high minimum wages creating longer commutes for workers that chose to stay with the employer or elimination of the jobs completely.
Nowhere is the harm imposed by a high minimum wage demonstrated more clearly than in Seattle, where the city council has aggressively increased the minimum wage over the last few years. The rash of restaurant closures and lost jobs can be attributed, in many cases, directly to the additional fiscal cost the minimum wage increases have caused.
As a recent University of Washington study concluded, “local minimum wage laws are not likely to substantially reduce earnings inequality,” it is obvious that government controls on wages, such as minimum wage and hazard pay have no long-term effects on workers’ overall income. The results of a high artificial minimum wage are exactly the opposite of the proponents desired result. High minimum wages reduce income and destroy jobs for those lower wage earners.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- POLL: Are you inclined to vote to approve the three remaining Washington initiatives?
Are you inclined to vote to approve the three remaining Washington initiatives? - Opinion: Where did the data come from for Ridgefield School District?
Ridgefield resident Heidi Pozzo provides sources for the information she has shared in her series of columns on the Ridgefield School District bond proposal before voters in the April 23 special election. - Opinion: When journalism fails – Ridgefield School District endorsementRidgefield resident Heidi Pozzo adds ‘the rest of the story’ not covered by a newspaper’s recent endorsement of Ridgefield School District bond.
- Opinion: As state’s CO2 tax faces voters, Inslee Administration using taxpayer funds to campaign for policyAs Washington’s CO2 tax, known as the Climate Commitment Act, heads to the ballot this fall, this logo highlighting projects that received funding from that tax will become more prevalent. And state residents are paying for it.
- Opinion: Student loan forgiveness? Bring it onClark County resident and long-time journalist Marvin Case shares his thoughts on the president’s attempt to seek a legal way to reduce or dismiss student college loan debts.
wpDiscuz
