
Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center points out that the results of a high artificial minimum wage are exactly the opposite of the proponents desired result
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
Washington State Labor and Industries (L&I) has announced that 2023 minimum wage rate will be set at $15.74 which is a $1.25 increase over 2022.
In a press release on the L&I website, the agency attributes the 8.66% increase to change in “the cost of common goods such as housing, food, and medical care as reflected in the Consumer Price Index.”

According to minimum-wage.org, Washington will have the highest statewide minimum wage in the country. The highest minimum wage in the nation, including municipalities that can set their own rates, is in Washington state, Sea Tac at $17.53 followed by Seattle at $17.27.
The federal minimum wage is $7.25.
Increasing the minimum wage to such a high level destroys jobs, reduces available work hours and causes inflation. Businesses will often relocate away from areas that have high minimum wages creating longer commutes for workers that chose to stay with the employer or elimination of the jobs completely.
Nowhere is the harm imposed by a high minimum wage demonstrated more clearly than in Seattle, where the city council has aggressively increased the minimum wage over the last few years. The rash of restaurant closures and lost jobs can be attributed, in many cases, directly to the additional fiscal cost the minimum wage increases have caused.
As a recent University of Washington study concluded, “local minimum wage laws are not likely to substantially reduce earnings inequality,” it is obvious that government controls on wages, such as minimum wage and hazard pay have no long-term effects on workers’ overall income. The results of a high artificial minimum wage are exactly the opposite of the proponents desired result. High minimum wages reduce income and destroy jobs for those lower wage earners.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: How do we share a city and foster community when our sincerely held moral frameworks clash so fundamentally?Matson argues Battle Ground’s council lacks the mandate to adjudicate sexual ethics or act as the town’s spiritual leader.
- Letter: When ‘inclusion’ mandates exclusion, sports lose its wayJonathan Hines argues forced Pride jerseys and banned Bible verses reveal a double standard in MLB’s inclusion policies.
- POLL: Did the Clark County Council make the right decision by rejecting the auditor authority proposal?The 3-2 council vote rejected giving the auditor’s office power to write financial impact statements for ballot measures.
- Opinion: Hospital price transparency is good, but its impact will be limitedWashington still shields hospitals from competition through certificate-of-need laws other states have repealed.
- Opinion: Washington tax collections are running below forecast as the economy softensWashington’s tax collections are $135.4 million behind forecast since February as employment and revenue both slip.







