![Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center believes a simple change will reverse the negative housing availability trend, all without increasing taxes.](https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Large_Clark-County-Today-Washington-is-losing-the-battle-to-build-enough-housing-but-could-reverse-the-trend-with-a-simple-change.jpg)
Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center believes a simple change will reverse the negative housing availability trend, all without increasing taxes
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
According to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Washington is expected to need an additional one million homes over the next 20 years.
![Mark Harmsworth, Washington Policy Center](https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/story_Clark-County-Today-Mark-Harmsworth-Photo-300x300.jpg)
The shortage was avoidable and in the most part created by legislation passed in 1990 called the Growth Management Act (GMA) which restricted how much and where you could build homes.
Passage of the GMA was driven by the perceived concerns about the effects of both population and economic growth on the environment. The Act was based on a philosophy of preventing affordable new housing from being built in open spaces outside existing built-up areas.
The primary goal was to promote density in existing cities and towns. The majority of lawmakers and Governor Booth Gardner, who signed the bill, gave little consideration to how it would drive up the cost of housing. New building growth, which usually occurs on the urban periphery, has laid the political foundation for a continuing movement to restrict and further control the pace and pattern of land development. Many Growth Management Act advocates argued that state and local land-use planning should actively shape the built environment for local citizens through zoning and various forms of centralized social control. This type of control, invariably, increases the cost of housing. GMA advocates and the lawmakers who voted for it knew it would drive up home prices, but they believed that “preserving open spaces” was more important. The high home prices Washingtonians see today are part of that legacy.
The legislature needs to pass legislation that promotes the availability of new housing rather than subsidizing the housing that is already built. Simple changes to the GMA, by modifying the arbitrary growth boundaries and population density goals set by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) will increase available land and the ability for more affordable housing to be built.
A simple change will reverse the negative housing availability trend, all without increasing taxes.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: OIC tells consumers not to pay for ‘insurance’ you won’t likely benefit from: Does that include WA Cares?Elizabeth New (Hovde) of the Washington Policy Center believes you should consider yourself warned by the Office of the Insurance Commissioner about WA Cares and its maybe-only benefit.
- Opinion: Same road, different speed limit?Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl addresses a question about speed limit signs going into and leaving town.
- Opinion: Hiding the growing cost of the Interstate Bridge replacementJoe Cortright of the City Observatory addresses the rising cost of the Interstate 5 Bridge replacement project.
- Letter: ‘This election I am NOT voting for Greg Cheney’Clark County resident Wynn Grcich shares her thoughts on Rep. Greg Cheney and the issue of fluoridation in area drinking water.
- POLL: Should biological males who identify as females be allowed to compete in athletic events against biological females?Should biological males who identify as females be allowed to compete in athletic events against biological females?