Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center believes a simple change will reverse the negative housing availability trend, all without increasing taxes

Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center

According to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Washington is expected to need an additional one million homes over the next 20 years.

The shortage was avoidable and in the most part created by legislation passed in 1990 called the Growth Management Act (GMA) which restricted how much and where you could build homes.

Passage of the GMA was driven by the perceived concerns about the effects of both population and economic growth on the environment. The Act was based on a philosophy of preventing affordable new housing from being built in open spaces outside existing built-up areas.

The primary goal was to promote density in existing cities and towns. The majority of lawmakers and Governor Booth Gardner, who signed the bill, gave little consideration to how it would drive up the cost of housing. New building growth, which usually occurs on the urban periphery, has laid the political foundation for a continuing movement to restrict and further control the pace and pattern of land development. Many Growth Management Act advocates argued that state and local land-use planning should actively shape the built environment for local citizens through zoning and various forms of centralized social control. This type of control, invariably, increases the cost of housing. GMA advocates and the lawmakers who voted for it knew it would drive up home prices, but they believed that “preserving open spaces” was more important. The high home prices Washingtonians see today are part of that legacy.

The legislature needs to pass legislation that promotes the availability of new housing rather than subsidizing the housing that is already built. Simple changes to the GMA, by modifying the arbitrary growth boundaries and population density goals set by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) will increase available land and the ability for more affordable housing to be built.

A simple change will reverse the negative housing availability trend, all without increasing taxes.

Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  POLL: After hearing state leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as vulnerable in an earthquake, what is your reaction?
  State and local leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as structurally at risk but recommend drivers continue crossing it while complex replacement plans unfold.
• 
  Opinion: Historical state income tax and another massive operating budget highlight the end of the 2026 legislative session
  Rep. John Ley details the passage of a state income tax, an expanding $80 billion budget, and new Clark County infrastructure funding following the 2026 legislative session.
• 
  Opinion: Fighting for transparency in Washington government
  A recent court decision allows Washington lawmakers broad new secrecy over internal records, as advocates report rising obstacles to government transparency and public engagement.
• 
  Opinion: Attacking Democracy in the name of Democracy
  Ryan Frost critiques several 2024 legislative bills, warning unchecked Democrat dominance enables policies that erode local accountability, block referenda, and threaten citizen participation.
• 
  Opinion: Washington passed an income tax to fund education, then the same majority cut education — and left $700+ million on the table
  State officials passed a new income tax to fund education, then approved over $1 billion in cuts—while forgoing $700 million in annual federal scholarships students could have received.