Elizabeth Hovde shares an opinion piece stating ‘The regressivity within this state-imposed program is one of the easiest reasons to be against the 2019 long-term-care law’
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
“For all the talk about Washington state’s unfair regressive sales tax, this also is a regressive tax,” writes the editorial board at the Tri-City Herald. “Think about it. Every worker is supposed to pay into the program, but people living paycheck to paycheck can least afford to take the deductions. And it may very well be that their contributions help buoy a system that provides benefits to others but not to them.”
Bingo. Pay attention to this opinion. The editorial board gets it. The regressivity within this state-imposed program is one of the easiest reasons to be against the 2019 long-term-care law containing a tax that begins in July. The payroll tax will take 58 cents of every $100 a W-2 worker in Washington state makes.
Read more shortcomings of the state’s new long-term-care plan in the Tri-City Herald’s editorial, “WA paychecks will take a hit this summer. Long-term care tax is about to get real.” The plan, which is not patient-centered and has a tax that will hurt workers’ ability to save for life’s many needs, is coming soon to a paycheck near you.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘Public trust in elections isn’t maintained by repeating talking points’
Camas resident demands answers after ballots discovered next to trash can, endorses Quiring O’Brien for auditor. - Opinion: Tax day is painful enough without Washington adding its own
Washington’s new 9.9% income tax mirrors federal pattern: start narrow, expand to hit everyone within years. - POLL: What do you believe is the biggest reason school districts are facing budget shortfalls?
Districts across Washington warn of budget gaps as debate grows over rising costs versus inadequate state funding. - Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning sign
IBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval. - Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning sign
IBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval.
