Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center discusses the belief that we can meet future energy needs with more wind power

Todd Myers
Washington Policy Center

The last week of July was the hottest of the year in Washington state and demand for electricity jumped to its highest level in the BPA region since March 10. Simultaneously, wind-generated electricity fell to nearly zero across Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. It is a good example of why wind power is a poor substitute for hydroelectric power. Energy that disappears when it is needed most is simply not sustainable.

During a four-day period July 25-28, wind and solar power across the entire region generated between 150 and 270 megawatts (MW) during peak demand hours in the early evening. That is only 2 percent of total generation and about the same as just one of the four Lower Snake River dams.

This isn’t rare.

Between January 25 and 28, when peak demand was over 9,000 MW every morning, total wind and solar generation provided between zero and 0.3 percent of total energy demanded. And when the BPA region had its highest demand of the year on February 23, reaching 10,422 MW, wind and solar accounted for less than 1 percent of energy used by customers across the Northwest.

When demand for electricity is greatest – due to hot or cold weather – too often, wind disappears.

The only meaningful amount of wind occurred just after midnight on the morning of July 27 when demand for electricity was at the lowest point of the day. As demand increased, the wind died down.

There are some who believe we can meet future energy needs with more wind power. Some argue we can replace hydro, which can be turned on when demand increases, with wind and solar. The experience of this week and earlier this year demonstrate that when wind is needed most, it is unreliable.

Todd Myers is the director of the Center for the Environment for the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Is government greed fueling the drive to defeat citizen-led ballot initiatives?
  Paul Guppy of the Washington Policy Center discusses how government greed may be fueling opposition to citizen-led ballot initiatives aimed at reducing new taxes in Washington state.
• 
  Opinion: WA Cares commission weighs in on how future recipients will be allowed to spend money
  Elizabeth New (Hovde) from the Washington Policy Center discusses the ongoing challenges with WA Cares, highlighting solvency concerns and the impact of Initiative 2124 on the program’s future.
• 
  POLL: If Tri-Mountain Golf Course were sold, how would you feel about it being developed into something else?
  Poll: How do you feel about the potential sale and development of Tri-Mountain Golf Course? Share your thoughts on this community issue!
• 
  Opinion: Fact check – Will repealing Washington’s CO2 tax harm ‘roads and bridges?’
  Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center says legislators and activists understand that residents want to improve the safety and efficiency of our transportation system Todd MyersWashington Policy Center One of the primary arguments made by supporters of Washington’s tax on CO2 emissions, called the Climate Commitment Act (CCA), is that if the state loses …
• 
  Opinion: Turn signals in parking lots
  Doug Dahl of Target Zero answers whether turn signals are required in parking lots, explaining their importance for safety and courtesy.