Opinion: The truth behind the ‘safe and effective’ Pfizer vaccine includes 1,291 side effects and counting

Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine

If for some reason you aren’t aware of the recent release of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine safety data, then I’d say the 24/7 mainstream media coverage of the Russia/Ukraine conflict is doing its job.  

Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
Click to open PDF

At first glance, it is tragically obvious why the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested a ridiculous window of 75 years to release all the Pfizer vaccine data. Conveniently, most of the people affected by the questionable jab would be dead by then. Thankfully, US District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas believed the release of this data to be “paramount to public importance,” and required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released. This shortens the full release of all pertinent data to around eight months. 

After nearly a year of being pestered, shamed, coerced and guilted into receiving one of the COVID-19 vaccines, Joe Biden on Jan. 4, had the nerve to say there is “no excuse for anyone being unvaccinated.” With the proof in black and white from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration itself, we actually have 1,291 “excuses” to remain unvaccinated, Mr. President.  

Heidi Wetzler, administrator, ClarkCountyToday.com
Heidi Wetzler, administrator, ClarkCountyToday.com

I cannot find words strong enough to express my anger. How many times have we heard the words “safe and effective” coming from our leaders in reference to vaccines? The recently released information includes 42,086 serious case reports, occurring in the first three months of the vaccine rollout and summarized in nine single-spaced pages entitled “Adverse Events of Special Interest.”  Which means, since the end of February 2021, these side effects have been known. Yet to this day, all we hear from medical professionals, and those in public health authority is that the vaccines are safe. Additionally, there is the truly outrageous fact that the vaccine companies are completely immune from liability.  

The first adverse event on the list is a chromosome disorder called 1p36 deletion syndrome.  The definition is as follows: A chromosome disorder is a change in chromosome number or structure which results in a set of features or symptoms. People with 1p36 deletion syndrome have lost a small but variable amount of genetic material from one of their 46 chromosomes.  

Remember when all those conspiracy theorists were posting their concerns that the new mRNA technology could change one’s DNA? And then all the “fact-checkers” were working overtime to label those dangerous posts as misinformation? But all the while, the FDA knew that this syndrome was a possible side effect of the vaccine.  

The list of hard-to-pronounce adverse events is presented in alphabetical order. A few I picked out that sounded familiar are arterial thrombosis, autoimmune endocrine disorder, cardiopulmonary failure, central nervous system lupus, colitis ulcerative, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, myocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, testicular autoimmunity, and vagus nerve paralysis. The events were classified as either serious or non-serious, however only serious cases were included in the report. There were over 22,000 serious general disorders reported, 14,000 serious nervous system disturbances, 8,000 serious musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders and 7,000 serious gastrointestinal disorders. The words autoimmune and thrombosis showed up a lot on the list. There were 270 “spontaneous abortions.”  

Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
Click to open PDF

As I reviewed the list, I was ignorantly shocked that there were even 1,300 different health diagnoses, let alone nearly 1,300 potential side effects for one vaccine. And the only word we ever heard them utter, was “safe.” How is everyone involved still walking around freely? There were also over 1,200 deaths reported in those first three months. Whether every death was undeniably caused by the vaccine, we will probably never know. But the possibility absolutely should have been disclosed. Informed consent was criminally absent. And even more sickening is that not one governing body has the integrity to be responsible. Not one honorable person or entity has the decency to say, “the buck stops here.” This is a heinous crime and I fear that no one will ever pay.  

Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said this in a recent interview, “So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way.” So, this woman can flippantly make this statement and that’s it? Thousands have been killed, maimed and permanently disabled from these vaccines and it’s because “the science” was too optimistic? Millions and millions have injected something into their bodies that they were told was safe.  

There was a National Terrorism advisory bulletin put out by the Department of Homeland Security on Feb. 7.  It states: The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence.   

How are the citizens of the United States of America supposed to interpret this bulletin, when the actors undermining public trust in the government are coming from the government itself? The irony would be comedic, if it wasn’t so utterly terrifying. Social media platforms have been censoring and labeling posts expressing concerns with the safety of the vaccines as false information, for the last two years. So, who exactly has been the bearer of truth in instructing them to do so? Where are the investigative journalists whose sole responsibility it is to flesh out these truths? Sadly, the answer is that they are weak, lazy, unprincipled people — sleepwalking their way to their paychecks from the propaganda machines. They are the ones continually repeating misinformation. We are a lost nation without true independent journalists.  

Another bit of misleading information the CDC has promoted since day 1, is that the vaccines are 95 percent effective. I would imagine most people would hear that number and think that they are protected 95 percent of the time. But this number is the Relative Risk Reduction and not the Absolute Risk Reduction. In the Pfizer vaccine trial, eight people out of 18,198 people in the vaccinated group contracted COVID. And 162 out of 18,325 people in the unvaccinated contracted COVID.  So, the risk of getting COVID if you were unvaccinated was .88 percent, and the risk if you were vaccinated was .04 percent. So, the published 95 percent refers to the relative difference between .88 percent and .04 percent. This reveals that the Absolute Risk Reduction for contracting COVID after receiving the vaccine, was less than 1 percent.  

I wonder what kind of vaccine compliance there would have been if everyone had access to the truth. What if people had known that the vaccine was protecting them from contracting COVID only 1 percent more than if they were unvaccinated? What if people had been handed a list of 1,291 potential side effects, many serious and disabling, before they rolled up their sleeves. This crime against humanity is egregious. 

In contrast, these are the serious side effects listed for outlawed Ivermectin: fever, blistering or peeling skin, rash, hives and itching. Good thing we have the experts keeping us safe. Remember, if there are effective treatments for a disease,  new vaccines will not be approved. Oh, and Pfizer is set to profit 36 billion dollars in 2022.  

To add insult to injury, the WHO is actively working on a pandemic pact, which is an international agreement regarding the prevention and control of future pandemics. You know, like a future pandemic Bill Gates recently stated was coming and would be worse than COVID. I wonder how he knows. This pact would allow the WHO to override a nation’s constitution during a pandemic. With the information we now have regarding the murderous lack of transparency during the managing of the COVID-19 pandemic and forced vaccination program, I pray that this will never happen.  

To wrap this up, am I the only one who missed the international celebration for conquering the pandemic? Where is Dr. Fauci and why isn’t he taking his victory lap? Maybe these 1,300 side effects have something to do with his disappearance. For two years all we heard about every single day from the mainstream media was COVID, COVID, COVID, and then poof, nothing. Vaccine passports are ending. Mask mandates are disappearing. Why isn’t the fact that the CDC and FDA lied incessantly about the safety of the vaccines part of the mainstream news cycle?  Why isn’t it front and center day in and day out? And if you are still sold out to the “cause?” I encourage you to put aside what you’ve been led to believe for the last two years and think critically. What else are they lying about? 

Also read:

  • Feds ID’d as primary source of COVID misinformation
    The primary source of COVID misinformation during the deadly pandemic was the federal government, according to a comment filed with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services by Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita and a number of vaccine and healthcare policy experts.
  • POLL: Should doctors who prescribe ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine be protected by law?
    Should doctors who prescribe ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine be protected by law?
  • New law protects docs who prescribe ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine
    Reacting to the suppression of certain “controversial” treatments for COVID-19, Missouri passed a law that bans pharmacists from questioning doctors who prescribe ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for their patients.
  • JAMA study: Pfizer COVID shot’s protection fades in weeks
    A peer-reviewed paper published by the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that immunity against the omicron coronavirus variant fades rapidly after a second and third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
  • Rheumatologist: 40% of my 3,000 vaxxed patients reported injury
    A veteran rheumatologist says about 40% of the approximately 3,000 vaccinated patients in his practice have reported a vaccine-related injury.
  • 17,000 doctors call for end to COVID-19 emergency
    Decrying “disastrous” COVID-19 public health policies, more than 17,000 physicians and medical scientists from around the world are calling on nations to lift health emergency declarations, restore scientific integrity and address “crimes against humanity.”
  • Network health expert warns AGAINST COVID boosters
    In a segment on “Good Morning America,” ABC News chief medical correspondent Dr. Jennifer Ashton warned it’s possible that repeated boosting actually can weaken the immune system.
  • Judge dismisses case that could affect her husband’s employer
    A federal judge in California has dismissed a lawsuit challenging Joe Biden’s COVID-19 vaccination mandates even though she admits that her husband is employed by and owns thousands of dollars of stock in a company that supports both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine projects, creating what appears to be a conflict of interest.
Advertisement
Advertisement
4.4 17 votes
Article Rating
Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest
33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sylvia
Sylvia
2 months ago

Thank you, Heidi Wetzler, for sharing your honest opinion based on facts, and so elequently expressed. Very seldom does the public have access to such pertinent information that helps enlighten all of us.

The FDA’s insistence to have 75 years before releasing Pfizer’s full vaccine data merely serves to confirm the covertness, duplicity and hypocritical attitude.

The article states:
“Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said this in a recent interview, “So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way.” So, this woman can flippantly make this statement and that’s it? Thousands have been killed, maimed and permanently disabled from these vaccines and it’s because “the science” was too optimistic? Millions and millions have injected something into their bodies that they were told was safe. ”

The above statement is thoughtless and callous. It should raise alarm bells for the Biden Administration. Surely it is better to err on the side of caution than to blithely blabber about baseless optimism like a drunken idiot!!!
As yet, very little is known about mRNA vaccines and their interaction with the immune system. Do they reprogram the immune system or sterilize it, in order to “train” it. A robust immune system is by far too sophisticated and too intelligent to require “training” by an unproven vaccine. A big unknown is the extent to which these vaccines impact epigenetics, ie gene expression or suppression.

These nRMA vaccines were developed within weeks, and injected into people in a matter of months under FDA’s EUA. Never before had mRNA vaccines been used in humans. Valid data on its pharmacology, long-term effects, efficacy, adverse reactions, and safety remain non-existent thus far. Yet, the CDC insists that it is perfectly safe and effective; and that “the benefits far outweigh the risks”. Really??
This offensive and flippant statement has echoed around the world.
Response to the mere mention of any adverse events has been a casually dismissive “they are rare and statistically insignificant”. How would Rochelle Walensky really feel if one of her relatives or friends suffered myocarditis or hepatic autoimmunity post-vaccination? What if she herself had it?
Even one adverse event is one too many. It involves human lives and wellbeing. To dismiss it with such disdain and disrespect is no less than a crime against humanity.
The exorbitant funds wasted on creating more drugs are better spent on helping people live a healthy lifestyle. This would replace the current system of ‘disease maintenance’ with true healhcare.

The article also states:
“There was a National Terrorism advisory bulletin put out by the Department of Homeland Security on Feb. 7. It states: The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence.

It begs the question as to:

  1. What constitutes mis/dis/mal-information, and by whose definition;

and

  1. Who the real perpetrators actually are.

America and some of its its NATO allies are forever accusing other sovereign nations of crimes against humanity, etc etc; Iraq and the non-existent WMDs are but one example of crimes against humanity perpetrated by the US.
Perhaps it is time for the accusers to start looking at their own reflection, and learn to fix internal problems before castigating others. 
Joe Biden promised to “unite America” during his campaign – the fact is, Mr President, that America is becoming more and more divisive. Even you would find that difficult to deny.
Learn some humility, and stop telling other nations what to do when your own country is drowning in a quagmire of hatred, discord and chaos. There is still time.
We live in a shared universe and share a common ownership. We will all suffer the dire consequences of these arrogant and irresponsible actions unless we all collaborate to accept and respect change, equality and diversity. They are inevitable parts of real life.
Learn to compete fairly, rather than try to oppress those who may pose a perceived ‘threat’ to your imagined ‘supremacy’.
Learn to respond responsibly rather than react in anger or retaliatory haste.
Learn to lead by example, and not by the use of threats to generate fear and force subjugation.
Allow us to live in a true democracy.

Sheryll
Sheryll
2 months ago

Safe and Effective,with over 1,000 side effects? That’s putting it lightly!! Are they running out of bribery monies?
Would it be easier to let washingtonians know who hasn’t taken those bribes?🤯

David Kay
David Kay
2 months ago

Locking up the facts forever with JFK report, 911, etc. Thank you, Heidi, for another great post!!!

Nancy
Nancy
2 months ago

Thank you for sharing the facts about the numerous adverse effects of covid mRNA vaccines. Too bad our Clark County Board of Health and County Council chooses to ignore these facts and continues to parrot the “safe and effective” vaccines. This is shown in the adoption of their Resolution 2022-03-09. How long will they continue to bury their head in the sand. Just look a the VAERS date Council & Board of Health The CDC has admitted to withholding the data. Heidi, I hope you will publish this ridiculous resolution adopted by the County Council so the public can hold them to account.

Justine
Justine
2 months ago
Reply to  Nancy

I couldn’t agree more, thank you.

Margaret
Margaret
2 months ago

The Clark County Board Council also acts as the Board of Health(BOH) and held a BOH meeting on Wednesday March 9, which is televised on CVTV. That meeting, and the CvTV coverage closed, and the County Council met to discuss various topics, including a resolution promoting the investigational CV vaccines. Councilor Medvigy championed the BOH resolution, and Council Chair Bowerman and Councilor Olsen enthusiastically voted for the resolution as well. Councilor Lentz was absent, and has expressed strong support for vaccination. The resolution belonged in the BOH meeting, where it had been discussed previously, and states in part,
“The Clark County Board of Health fully endorses the COVID-19 recommendations provided by the Clark County Public Health department as these public health measures effectively reduce the impacts of COVID-19:
1. COVID-19 vaccinations are highly recommended as safe and effective, are widely available at no cost to all residents age five and older.”

The Vaccine Adverse Events reporting system does not include all the adverse events after vaccination, in part because not all healthcare providers and hospitals are reporting adverse events. In addition, people who received the injections may not realize they can report to VAERS or find it difficult to file a report, especially if they experience a serious health decline after vaccination. If they pass away after vaccination, it’s unlikely a relative or caregiver knows about VAERS, and the importance of filing a report etc. There have been more deaths, more permanent disabilities, and more hospitalizations reported to VAERS following the experimental COVID-19 vaccines, than there have been following all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 31 years COMBINED.

VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,151,450 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 24,827 deaths and 200,331 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 25, 2022. See article about reports: 8,817 COVID Vaccine Injuries Reported to CDC Among Kids 5 to 11, as Study Shows Pfizer Vaccine Only 12% Effective in That Age Group

Last edited 2 months ago by Margaret
Nancy
Nancy
2 months ago
Reply to  Margaret

Thanks for posting this Margaret! The Clark County Council is so out of touch.

Rob Anderson
Rob Anderson
2 months ago
Reply to  Margaret

Councilor Medvigy would say, “you just don’t understand.” The Council has dramatically failed the people of Clark County. They’ve sat on their hands for two years, hiding from the public behind their screens, never once challenged the policies or provided Constitutional scrutiny to public health policies or mandates. They see themselves as an extension & defender of the bureaucracy rather than the people that put them there on their behalf. They sat back while nursing homes were overwhelmed by Covid patients from Inslee’s decree, allowed a man from Lake Oswego needlessly shutdown the County, did nothing as children were needlessly harmed, not by Covid but by Covid mandates… no checks, no balances and when the people rose up wanting relief they joined the bureaucratic state, the Democrat lawyers, rather than listening and standing against discriminating mandates.
We’ve learned a lot these past couple of years… time to act and never let this happen again.

Last edited 2 months ago by Rob Anderson
George Carpenter
George Carpenter
2 months ago

If you need information on the benefits/risks of taking a vaccine, or any drug, talk to your doctor. If you rely on people that don’t know the difference between an adverse event report and clinically documented causes and effects for medical advice, you are going to be sicker than you should be.

Jim Winski
Jim Winski
2 months ago

Heidi Wetzler needs to make clear whether or not she has any medical or scientific training. After reading several of her articles and claims against the vaccines that she does not have much education in the area. She does not know how to read or interpret scientific data, has no understanding of how clinical trials and drug development work, and really doesn’t even understand the basis of the scientific method. Heidi states it clearly in this opinion piece when she says “As I reviewed the list, I was ignorantly shocked that there were even 1,300 different health diagnoses…” Yes Heidi, “ignorant” is a good description.

Rob Anderson
Rob Anderson
2 months ago
Reply to  Jim Winski

Do you need a med degree to have critical thinking skills? Does everyone who has a med degree instantly become authoritative or free from bias, corruption or fraud?

David Knight
David Knight
1 month ago
Reply to  Jim Winski

There are former heads of Pfizer and several prestigious doctors and scientists who agree with Heidi. The clot shot is pushed by those with financial ties.

But the easiest way to know who is lying is the censorship and propaganda employed. Make no mistake, this is a war on humanity. It is unlikely that the information Heidi found will be available, the next time these global controllers take a shot at complete subjugation of the human race.
The reforms we make MUST preclude this ANYTHING LIKE THIS from happening again, or most may never notice it as controversial.

Ben Keller
Ben Keller
2 months ago

Heidi, your rhetoric is embarrassing. Because the 1,291 side effects listed are not actual side effects from the vaccine; they’re possible side effects that Pfizer was LOOKING OUT FOR while testing/administering the vaccine. This is not a list of 1,291 side effects caused by the vaccine.

As a journalist, you should perform due diligence gathering the information. This is plain lazy..

Sarika
Sarika
1 month ago
Reply to  Ben Keller

Many adverse events were reports,if you look at document from page 8 till about page 30,not too mention that I’ve observed a heart failure case of a relative ,a few months after the vaccination

See first document for download on website below

https://www.icandecide.org/pfizer/

Jenny
Jenny
12 days ago
Reply to  Sarika

Adverse events do not prove causality. I could take 2 ibuprofen and die of a heart attack. Doesn’t mean they’re related.

Sylvia
Sylvia
2 months ago

The request by the FDA to have 75 years before releasing Pfizer clinical data on the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine was, thankfully, refused by a Judge. Consequently the first 55,000 pages have now been released – they make interesting reading. Very revealing, enlightening, and deeply worrying.
And, most importantly, no science or medical degree is needed to gain a basic understanding of its contents.
To me the revelations confirm the serious concerns that numerous scientists have raised since the early days of the ‘plan’demic. Most concerning indeed!

It will take approximately 8 months for all the data to be made public – as per the Judge’s order. Stay tuned!

Craig Welch
Craig Welch
27 days ago
Reply to  Sylvia

And, most importantly, no science or medical degree is needed to gain a basic understanding of its contents.

To me the revelations confirm the serious concerns that numerous scientists have raised since the early days of the ‘plan’demic. Most concerning indeed!

Your second sentence ‘revelations confirm the serious concerns …’ indicates that, if not a medical/science degree, at least a better understanding of what is included is required.

Adverse Events of Special Interest” is indeed unambiguously clear – to those who understand clinical trials. It is not what you think it is. It is not a list of side-effects. It was compiled before the clinical trial, and is a list of things to look for.

Pfizer wrote:

— The company’s AESI list takes into consideration the lists of AESIs from the following expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished guideline).

— The AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general.

— The AESI list is comprised of MedDRA PTs, HLTs, HLGTs or MedDRA SMQs and can be changed as appropriate based on the evolving safety profile of the vaccine.

— Table 7 provides a summary review of cumulative cases within AESI categories in the Pfizer safety database. This is distinct from safety signal evaluations which are conducted and included, as appropriate, in the Summary Monthly Safety Reports submitted regularly to the FDA and other Health Authorities
It is a standardised list of *possible* adverse events, drawn up to improve classification. It is not Pfizer’s.

Sylvia
Sylvia
27 days ago
Reply to  Craig Welch

Thank you for your detailed analysis.
As you stated, the Adverse Events of Special Interest are adverse effects that could potentially occur. To be even more specific: 

  1. They may, or may not, occur.
  2. Currently there is zero scientific data as to the short/long-term effects of the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines.
  3. Consequently there is no valid scientific basis for the narrative that “the vaccine is safe and effective”, or “the benefits far outweigh the risks”.
  4. Adverse events resulting in injuries and deaths have happened to people post-vaccination. To callously dismiss these as ‘statistically insignificant’ or ‘rare’ is inhumane and medically unethical. To the people who experienced such adverse events it is very real and has negatively impacted their life in varying degrees.

It begs the question why anything that either differs from, or even questions, the established narrative is categorized as ‘misinformation’, ‘conspiracy theory’, or even ‘domestic terrorism’. Fear and threats have been used extremely effectively to cower masses into abject submission. Why not have an open discussion, debate, conflict resolution????
An informed decision to vaccinate or not vaccinate must be based on open access to factual scientific data, not on arbitrary mandates and cover-ups.
If everything is indeed above board, open discussion among scientists as well as in public fori must be encouraged. Instead, reputable practitioners and scientists have been deregistered, silenced, vilified, and treated like criminals. Why is that?

Sylvia
Sylvia
2 months ago

The first 55,000 pages of Pfizer data released by the FDA (as ordered by US District Judge Mark Pittman), represent the actual document prepared by the manufacturer of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine for Covid-19.
The contents do nor represent any interpretation by any other person(s) or organization(s).
The pages listing the “Adverse Events of Special Interest” are unambiguously clear. Certainly no medical or science degree is required unless anyone wants to go into details at the molecular biology level. For most, an awareness of the facts would be a great start!

Delmar Flath
1 month ago

Thank you Heidi, it’s so refreshing to finally witness a person with integrity reporting the truth based on facts. And I’m know expert but this article you wrote I can’t even muster up the words to explain how happy and enlightened I am. My wife and I knew from the beginning that there is something wrong here. So we stuck to our guns and did no get vaccinated. My daughter and her boyfriend are both pharmacists that have Basically been Forced to get vaccinated and this whole time they thought mom and dad were paranoid, delusional idiots. We only pray that neither one of them are affected by any side effects from this poison. Job well done!

Michael Brickley
Michael Brickley
27 days ago
Reply to  Delmar Flath

Don’t you think it would help if you mentioned how many people were vaccinated. An MD went thru this as did a Ph.D and percentages are important. Mentioning #’s without percentages is meaningless. Also, side effects, adverse effects don’t mean it was because of the vaccine. A lot of false claims have been made and this seems like similar.

David Knight
David Knight
19 days ago

They are mandating this thing for children. Thanks for pointing out some of them will be OK. How many poison M&Ms in a bag do you tolerate for your child?

Michael Brickley
Michael Brickley
27 days ago
Reply to  Delmar Flath

Delmar Flath, poison? A little harsh, I’d say. Look into Rhonda Patrick Ph.D

David Knight
David Knight
19 days ago

global medical fascism

Craig Welch
Craig Welch
27 days ago

Can you point out the words that say something like “adverse effects caused by the Pfizer vaccine” ?

The nine pages entitled ‘LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST’ is *not* a list of adverse events found to be related to the Pfizer vaccine during the trial. It is a standardised list of *possible* adverse events, drawn up *before the clinical trial* to improve classification. 

It includes potential adverse events from a variety of sources, not just Pfizer.

Jenny
Jenny
12 days ago
Reply to  Craig Welch

Direct, Craig.
The AESIs that are described within this document were originally selected based on a theoretical rationale for a possible association with COVID-19 vaccines. For example, they include events that may occur during the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection or as a complication of infection.

Jenny
Jenny
12 days ago
Reply to  Craig Welch

*Correct not direct!

Tyler t
Tyler t
24 days ago

Heidi, this article is GARBAGE

Jenny
Jenny
12 days ago

An AESI is a PRE-specified medically-significant event that has the potential to be causally associated with a vaccine product that needs to be carefully monitored and confirmed by further special studies. This means the list was compiled before the trial and not that these are side effects of the vaccine.

Sylvia
Sylvia
12 days ago
Reply to  Heidi Wetzler

Thank you, Heidi, for your rational post. Each person’s biochemistry is unique to that person – hence, a ‘one size fits all’ treatment is bound to fail.
It is shocking that anyone who even questions the ‘mandated narratives’ is categorized as spreading either mis- or dis-information. Anyone who has a different opinion is treated as a conspirationist or domestic terrorist. Why is this happening in America?
It stands to reason that any risk(s), potential or otherwise, must be disclosed in full detail to the public.
Where there is RISK, there must be CHOICE.
True FREEDOM includes the RIGHT to say NO.

Jenny
Jenny
6 days ago
Reply to  Heidi Wetzler

They aren’t actually thought of as potential side effects. Every medical event that follows a vaccination has not necessarily been caused by that vaccination. As I said above, if I take two ibuprofen and find out I have cancer the next week, that doesn’t mean it’s caused by the pills. If you are looking at millions of people you’d expect that many thousands of health issues would come up in weeks following vaccination. Just as they would if you followed the unVaccinated.
Several side effects have been acknowledged. The most severe being myocarditis and clotting. But to say that there are 1296 side effects is just not true.