
Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine
If for some reason you aren’t aware of the recent release of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine safety data, then I’d say the 24/7 mainstream media coverage of the Russia/Ukraine conflict is doing its job.
At first glance, it is tragically obvious why the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested a ridiculous window of 75 years to release all the Pfizer vaccine data. Conveniently, most of the people affected by the questionable jab would be dead by then. Thankfully, US District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas believed the release of this data to be “paramount to public importance,” and required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released. This shortens the full release of all pertinent data to around eight months.
After nearly a year of being pestered, shamed, coerced and guilted into receiving one of the COVID-19 vaccines, Joe Biden on Jan. 4, had the nerve to say there is “no excuse for anyone being unvaccinated.” With the proof in black and white from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration itself, we actually have 1,291 “excuses” to remain unvaccinated, Mr. President.

I cannot find words strong enough to express my anger. How many times have we heard the words “safe and effective” coming from our leaders in reference to vaccines? The recently released information includes 42,086 serious case reports, occurring in the first three months of the vaccine rollout and summarized in nine single-spaced pages entitled “Adverse Events of Special Interest.” Which means, since the end of February 2021, these side effects have been known. Yet to this day, all we hear from medical professionals, and those in public health authority is that the vaccines are safe. Additionally, there is the truly outrageous fact that the vaccine companies are completely immune from liability.
The first adverse event on the list is a chromosome disorder called 1p36 deletion syndrome. The definition is as follows: A chromosome disorder is a change in chromosome number or structure which results in a set of features or symptoms. People with 1p36 deletion syndrome have lost a small but variable amount of genetic material from one of their 46 chromosomes.
Remember when all those conspiracy theorists were posting their concerns that the new mRNA technology could change one’s DNA? And then all the “fact-checkers” were working overtime to label those dangerous posts as misinformation? But all the while, the FDA knew that this syndrome was a possible side effect of the vaccine.
The list of hard-to-pronounce adverse events is presented in alphabetical order. A few I picked out that sounded familiar are arterial thrombosis, autoimmune endocrine disorder, cardiopulmonary failure, central nervous system lupus, colitis ulcerative, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, myocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, testicular autoimmunity, and vagus nerve paralysis. The events were classified as either serious or non-serious, however only serious cases were included in the report. There were over 22,000 serious general disorders reported, 14,000 serious nervous system disturbances, 8,000 serious musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders and 7,000 serious gastrointestinal disorders. The words autoimmune and thrombosis showed up a lot on the list. There were 270 “spontaneous abortions.”
As I reviewed the list, I was ignorantly shocked that there were even 1,300 different health diagnoses, let alone nearly 1,300 potential side effects for one vaccine. And the only word we ever heard them utter, was “safe.” How is everyone involved still walking around freely? There were also over 1,200 deaths reported in those first three months. Whether every death was undeniably caused by the vaccine, we will probably never know. But the possibility absolutely should have been disclosed. Informed consent was criminally absent. And even more sickening is that not one governing body has the integrity to be responsible. Not one honorable person or entity has the decency to say, “the buck stops here.” This is a heinous crime and I fear that no one will ever pay.
Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said this in a recent interview, “So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way.” So, this woman can flippantly make this statement and that’s it? Thousands have been killed, maimed and permanently disabled from these vaccines and it’s because “the science” was too optimistic? Millions and millions have injected something into their bodies that they were told was safe.
There was a National Terrorism advisory bulletin put out by the Department of Homeland Security on Feb. 7. It states: The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence.
How are the citizens of the United States of America supposed to interpret this bulletin, when the actors undermining public trust in the government are coming from the government itself? The irony would be comedic, if it wasn’t so utterly terrifying. Social media platforms have been censoring and labeling posts expressing concerns with the safety of the vaccines as false information, for the last two years. So, who exactly has been the bearer of truth in instructing them to do so? Where are the investigative journalists whose sole responsibility it is to flesh out these truths? Sadly, the answer is that they are weak, lazy, unprincipled people — sleepwalking their way to their paychecks from the propaganda machines. They are the ones continually repeating misinformation. We are a lost nation without true independent journalists.
Another bit of misleading information the CDC has promoted since day 1, is that the vaccines are 95 percent effective. I would imagine most people would hear that number and think that they are protected 95 percent of the time. But this number is the Relative Risk Reduction and not the Absolute Risk Reduction. In the Pfizer vaccine trial, eight people out of 18,198 people in the vaccinated group contracted COVID. And 162 out of 18,325 people in the unvaccinated contracted COVID. So, the risk of getting COVID if you were unvaccinated was .88 percent, and the risk if you were vaccinated was .04 percent. So, the published 95 percent refers to the relative difference between .88 percent and .04 percent. This reveals that the Absolute Risk Reduction for contracting COVID after receiving the vaccine, was less than 1 percent.
I wonder what kind of vaccine compliance there would have been if everyone had access to the truth. What if people had known that the vaccine was protecting them from contracting COVID only 1 percent more than if they were unvaccinated? What if people had been handed a list of 1,291 potential side effects, many serious and disabling, before they rolled up their sleeves. This crime against humanity is egregious.
In contrast, these are the serious side effects listed for outlawed Ivermectin: fever, blistering or peeling skin, rash, hives and itching. Good thing we have the experts keeping us safe. Remember, if there are effective treatments for a disease, new vaccines will not be approved. Oh, and Pfizer is set to profit 36 billion dollars in 2022.
To add insult to injury, the WHO is actively working on a pandemic pact, which is an international agreement regarding the prevention and control of future pandemics. You know, like a future pandemic Bill Gates recently stated was coming and would be worse than COVID. I wonder how he knows. This pact would allow the WHO to override a nation’s constitution during a pandemic. With the information we now have regarding the murderous lack of transparency during the managing of the COVID-19 pandemic and forced vaccination program, I pray that this will never happen.
To wrap this up, am I the only one who missed the international celebration for conquering the pandemic? Where is Dr. Fauci and why isn’t he taking his victory lap? Maybe these 1,300 side effects have something to do with his disappearance. For two years all we heard about every single day from the mainstream media was COVID, COVID, COVID, and then poof, nothing. Vaccine passports are ending. Mask mandates are disappearing. Why isn’t the fact that the CDC and FDA lied incessantly about the safety of the vaccines part of the mainstream news cycle? Why isn’t it front and center day in and day out? And if you are still sold out to the “cause?” I encourage you to put aside what you’ve been led to believe for the last two years and think critically. What else are they lying about?
Thank you, Heidi Wetzler, for sharing your honest opinion based on facts, and so elequently expressed. Very seldom does the public have access to such pertinent information that helps enlighten all of us.
The FDA’s insistence to have 75 years before releasing Pfizer’s full vaccine data merely serves to confirm the covertness, duplicity and hypocritical attitude.
The article states:
“Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said this in a recent interview, “So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way.” So, this woman can flippantly make this statement and that’s it? Thousands have been killed, maimed and permanently disabled from these vaccines and it’s because “the science” was too optimistic? Millions and millions have injected something into their bodies that they were told was safe. ”
The above statement is thoughtless and callous. It should raise alarm bells for the Biden Administration. Surely it is better to err on the side of caution than to blithely blabber about baseless optimism like a drunken idiot!!!
As yet, very little is known about mRNA vaccines and their interaction with the immune system. Do they reprogram the immune system or sterilize it, in order to “train” it. A robust immune system is by far too sophisticated and too intelligent to require “training” by an unproven vaccine. A big unknown is the extent to which these vaccines impact epigenetics, ie gene expression or suppression.
These nRMA vaccines were developed within weeks, and injected into people in a matter of months under FDA’s EUA. Never before had mRNA vaccines been used in humans. Valid data on its pharmacology, long-term effects, efficacy, adverse reactions, and safety remain non-existent thus far. Yet, the CDC insists that it is perfectly safe and effective; and that “the benefits far outweigh the risks”. Really??
This offensive and flippant statement has echoed around the world.
Response to the mere mention of any adverse events has been a casually dismissive “they are rare and statistically insignificant”. How would Rochelle Walensky really feel if one of her relatives or friends suffered myocarditis or hepatic autoimmunity post-vaccination? What if she herself had it?
Even one adverse event is one too many. It involves human lives and wellbeing. To dismiss it with such disdain and disrespect is no less than a crime against humanity.
The exorbitant funds wasted on creating more drugs are better spent on helping people live a healthy lifestyle. This would replace the current system of ‘disease maintenance’ with true healhcare.
The article also states:
“There was a National Terrorism advisory bulletin put out by the Department of Homeland Security on Feb. 7. It states: The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence.”
It begs the question as to:
and
America and some of its its NATO allies are forever accusing other sovereign nations of crimes against humanity, etc etc; Iraq and the non-existent WMDs are but one example of crimes against humanity perpetrated by the US.
Perhaps it is time for the accusers to start looking at their own reflection, and learn to fix internal problems before castigating others.
Joe Biden promised to “unite America” during his campaign – the fact is, Mr President, that America is becoming more and more divisive. Even you would find that difficult to deny.
Learn some humility, and stop telling other nations what to do when your own country is drowning in a quagmire of hatred, discord and chaos. There is still time.
We live in a shared universe and share a common ownership. We will all suffer the dire consequences of these arrogant and irresponsible actions unless we all collaborate to accept and respect change, equality and diversity. They are inevitable parts of real life.
Learn to compete fairly, rather than try to oppress those who may pose a perceived ‘threat’ to your imagined ‘supremacy’.
Learn to respond responsibly rather than react in anger or retaliatory haste.
Learn to lead by example, and not by the use of threats to generate fear and force subjugation.
Allow us to live in a true democracy.
I have so many thoughts in response to your statements but am so tired of trying to educate. One thing though that you are mistaken on…..we are a Constitutional Republic….not a democracy.
Your well considered reply is much appreciated. I can 100% see your point. No problem there at all. An intellectual exchange of opinions is uplifting indeed.
President Biden, and many of his predecessors, have referred to US as a democracy, whilst criticizing multiple countries for not being democratic.
An all-time valued quote that epitomizes the very essence of democracy:
“Government of the people, by the people and for the people” were the words used by Abraham Lincoln in 1863 while talking about democracy.
UK has a Parliamentary Democracy under a Constitutional Monarchy. There are socialist democracies, and so many other variations.
As you no doubt know many nations use the word ‘democracy’ in ways that may diverge from the true origin of democracy in Ancient Greece, but may be more fit for purpose in their circumstances. For example, governing a population of over one billion is vastly different from ruling over a few hundred million.
Fascinating research indeed.
A US Government document below, dated 2003, is most enlightening:
“DEMOCRACY AND ITS AMERICAN INTERPRETATION”
“1. What is the purpose of the U.S. Government?
The purpose is expressed in the preamble to the Constitution: ‘‘We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.’’
2. What form of government do we have in the United States?
The United States, under its Constitution, is a federal, representative, democratic republic, an indivisible union of 50 sovereign States. With the exception of town meetings, a form of pure democ- racy, we have at the local, state, and national levels a government which is: ‘‘federal’’ because power is shared among these three levels; ‘‘democratic’’ because the people govern themselves and have the means to control the government; and ‘‘republic’’ because the people choose elected delegates by free and secret ballot.”
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CDOC-108hdoc94/pdf/CDOC-108hdoc94.pdf
I believe that whatever a style of government is referred to is far less important than its actions. As long as it genuinely remains true to the core of democracy:
“Government OF the people, BY the people and FOR the people.”
William Shakespeare stated it so perfectly:
“What is in a name; that which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet“.
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts.
Here’s hoping that 2023 will bring unity in diversity to all of us.
Safe and Effective,with over 1,000 side effects? That’s putting it lightly!! Are they running out of bribery monies?
Would it be easier to let washingtonians know who hasn’t taken those bribes?🤯
Locking up the facts forever with JFK report, 911, etc. Thank you, Heidi, for another great post!!!
Thank you for sharing the facts about the numerous adverse effects of covid mRNA vaccines. Too bad our Clark County Board of Health and County Council chooses to ignore these facts and continues to parrot the “safe and effective” vaccines. This is shown in the adoption of their Resolution 2022-03-09. How long will they continue to bury their head in the sand. Just look a the VAERS date Council & Board of Health The CDC has admitted to withholding the data. Heidi, I hope you will publish this ridiculous resolution adopted by the County Council so the public can hold them to account.
I couldn’t agree more, thank you.
The Clark County Board Council also acts as the Board of Health(BOH) and held a BOH meeting on Wednesday March 9, which is televised on CVTV. That meeting, and the CvTV coverage closed, and the County Council met to discuss various topics, including a resolution promoting the investigational CV vaccines. Councilor Medvigy championed the BOH resolution, and Council Chair Bowerman and Councilor Olsen enthusiastically voted for the resolution as well. Councilor Lentz was absent, and has expressed strong support for vaccination. The resolution belonged in the BOH meeting, where it had been discussed previously, and states in part,
“The Clark County Board of Health fully endorses the COVID-19 recommendations provided by the Clark County Public Health department as these public health measures effectively reduce the impacts of COVID-19:
1. COVID-19 vaccinations are highly recommended as safe and effective, are widely available at no cost to all residents age five and older.”
The Vaccine Adverse Events reporting system does not include all the adverse events after vaccination, in part because not all healthcare providers and hospitals are reporting adverse events. In addition, people who received the injections may not realize they can report to VAERS or find it difficult to file a report, especially if they experience a serious health decline after vaccination. If they pass away after vaccination, it’s unlikely a relative or caregiver knows about VAERS, and the importance of filing a report etc. There have been more deaths, more permanent disabilities, and more hospitalizations reported to VAERS following the experimental COVID-19 vaccines, than there have been following all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 31 years COMBINED.
VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,151,450 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 24,827 deaths and 200,331 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 25, 2022. See article about reports: 8,817 COVID Vaccine Injuries Reported to CDC Among Kids 5 to 11, as Study Shows Pfizer Vaccine Only 12% Effective in That Age Group
Thanks for posting this Margaret! The Clark County Council is so out of touch.
Councilor Medvigy would say, “you just don’t understand.” The Council has dramatically failed the people of Clark County. They’ve sat on their hands for two years, hiding from the public behind their screens, never once challenged the policies or provided Constitutional scrutiny to public health policies or mandates. They see themselves as an extension & defender of the bureaucracy rather than the people that put them there on their behalf. They sat back while nursing homes were overwhelmed by Covid patients from Inslee’s decree, allowed a man from Lake Oswego needlessly shutdown the County, did nothing as children were needlessly harmed, not by Covid but by Covid mandates… no checks, no balances and when the people rose up wanting relief they joined the bureaucratic state, the Democrat lawyers, rather than listening and standing against discriminating mandates.
We’ve learned a lot these past couple of years… time to act and never let this happen again.
If you need information on the benefits/risks of taking a vaccine, or any drug, talk to your doctor. If you rely on people that don’t know the difference between an adverse event report and clinically documented causes and effects for medical advice, you are going to be sicker than you should be.
Wow! The brainwashing worked huh. Those “doctors” you’re referring to..how many of those that spoke out on the injuries from the jabs had their licenses revoked?…those “doctors” that you’re saying to trust kept their mouths shut for fear of retaliation and losing their license!
Trust the doctors? Bless it.
Heidi Wetzler needs to make clear whether or not she has any medical or scientific training. After reading several of her articles and claims against the vaccines that she does not have much education in the area. She does not know how to read or interpret scientific data, has no understanding of how clinical trials and drug development work, and really doesn’t even understand the basis of the scientific method. Heidi states it clearly in this opinion piece when she says “As I reviewed the list, I was ignorantly shocked that there were even 1,300 different health diagnoses…” Yes Heidi, “ignorant” is a good description.
Do you need a med degree to have critical thinking skills? Does everyone who has a med degree instantly become authoritative or free from bias, corruption or fraud?
There are former heads of Pfizer and several prestigious doctors and scientists who agree with Heidi. The clot shot is pushed by those with financial ties.
But the easiest way to know who is lying is the censorship and propaganda employed. Make no mistake, this is a war on humanity. It is unlikely that the information Heidi found will be available, the next time these global controllers take a shot at complete subjugation of the human race.
The reforms we make MUST preclude this ANYTHING LIKE THIS from happening again, or most may never notice it as controversial.
Heidi, your rhetoric is embarrassing. Because the 1,291 side effects listed are not actual side effects from the vaccine; they’re possible side effects that Pfizer was LOOKING OUT FOR while testing/administering the vaccine. This is not a list of 1,291 side effects caused by the vaccine.
As a journalist, you should perform due diligence gathering the information. This is plain lazy..
Many adverse events were reports,if you look at document from page 8 till about page 30,not too mention that I’ve observed a heart failure case of a relative ,a few months after the vaccination
See first document for download on website below
https://www.icandecide.org/pfizer/
Adverse events do not prove causality. I could take 2 ibuprofen and die of a heart attack. Doesn’t mean they’re related.
The request by the FDA to have 75 years before releasing Pfizer clinical data on the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine was, thankfully, refused by a Judge. Consequently the first 55,000 pages have now been released – they make interesting reading. Very revealing, enlightening, and deeply worrying.
And, most importantly, no science or medical degree is needed to gain a basic understanding of its contents.
To me the revelations confirm the serious concerns that numerous scientists have raised since the early days of the ‘plan’demic. Most concerning indeed!
It will take approximately 8 months for all the data to be made public – as per the Judge’s order. Stay tuned!
Your second sentence ‘revelations confirm the serious concerns …’ indicates that, if not a medical/science degree, at least a better understanding of what is included is required.
“Adverse Events of Special Interest” is indeed unambiguously clear – to those who understand clinical trials. It is not what you think it is. It is not a list of side-effects. It was compiled before the clinical trial, and is a list of things to look for.
Pfizer wrote:
— The company’s AESI list takes into consideration the lists of AESIs from the following expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished guideline).
— The AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general.
— The AESI list is comprised of MedDRA PTs, HLTs, HLGTs or MedDRA SMQs and can be changed as appropriate based on the evolving safety profile of the vaccine.
— Table 7 provides a summary review of cumulative cases within AESI categories in the Pfizer safety database. This is distinct from safety signal evaluations which are conducted and included, as appropriate, in the Summary Monthly Safety Reports submitted regularly to the FDA and other Health Authorities
It is a standardised list of *possible* adverse events, drawn up to improve classification. It is not Pfizer’s.
Thank you for your detailed analysis.
As you stated, the Adverse Events of Special Interest are adverse effects that could potentially occur. To be even more specific:
It begs the question why anything that either differs from, or even questions, the established narrative is categorized as ‘misinformation’, ‘conspiracy theory’, or even ‘domestic terrorism’. Fear and threats have been used extremely effectively to cower masses into abject submission. Why not have an open discussion, debate, conflict resolution????
An informed decision to vaccinate or not vaccinate must be based on open access to factual scientific data, not on arbitrary mandates and cover-ups.
If everything is indeed above board, open discussion among scientists as well as in public fori must be encouraged. Instead, reputable practitioners and scientists have been deregistered, silenced, vilified, and treated like criminals. Why is that?
The first 55,000 pages of Pfizer data released by the FDA (as ordered by US District Judge Mark Pittman), represent the actual document prepared by the manufacturer of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine for Covid-19.
The contents do nor represent any interpretation by any other person(s) or organization(s).
The pages listing the “Adverse Events of Special Interest” are unambiguously clear. Certainly no medical or science degree is required unless anyone wants to go into details at the molecular biology level. For most, an awareness of the facts would be a great start!
Thank you Heidi, it’s so refreshing to finally witness a person with integrity reporting the truth based on facts. And I’m know expert but this article you wrote I can’t even muster up the words to explain how happy and enlightened I am. My wife and I knew from the beginning that there is something wrong here. So we stuck to our guns and did no get vaccinated. My daughter and her boyfriend are both pharmacists that have Basically been Forced to get vaccinated and this whole time they thought mom and dad were paranoid, delusional idiots. We only pray that neither one of them are affected by any side effects from this poison. Job well done!
Don’t you think it would help if you mentioned how many people were vaccinated. An MD went thru this as did a Ph.D and percentages are important. Mentioning #’s without percentages is meaningless. Also, side effects, adverse effects don’t mean it was because of the vaccine. A lot of false claims have been made and this seems like similar.
They are mandating this thing for children. Thanks for pointing out some of them will be OK. How many poison M&Ms in a bag do you tolerate for your child?
Delmar Flath, poison? A little harsh, I’d say. Look into Rhonda Patrick Ph.D
global medical fascism
Can you point out the words that say something like “adverse effects caused by the Pfizer vaccine” ?
The nine pages entitled ‘LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST’ is *not* a list of adverse events found to be related to the Pfizer vaccine during the trial. It is a standardised list of *possible* adverse events, drawn up *before the clinical trial* to improve classification.
It includes potential adverse events from a variety of sources, not just Pfizer.
Direct, Craig.
The AESIs that are described within this document were originally selected based on a theoretical rationale for a possible association with COVID-19 vaccines. For example, they include events that may occur during the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection or as a complication of infection.
*Correct not direct!
Heidi, this article is GARBAGE
An AESI is a PRE-specified medically-significant event that has the potential to be causally associated with a vaccine product that needs to be carefully monitored and confirmed by further special studies. This means the list was compiled before the trial and not that these are side effects of the vaccine.
I agree with you that this list was known before the trial. These were known potential side effects. So why, then, was it billed as safe and effective? Every single person who received the vaccine should have also received this list of possible side effects. It is nothing short of criminal that people were not informed of these potential risks. This is precisely why The Nuremberg Code was created. This is malfeasance plain and simple. I will never understand the intense public support these vaccines have received, with not one shred of informed consent. It is quite convenient to claim that someone’s blood clot just “happened” to occur after a vaccine. Or their death was merely coincidental 2 days after they received a shot. Brilliant in fact. I also take issue with the manner in which most who believe they have been harmed by these vaccines, are dismissed by the medical community. There are 1,291 potential side effects, but no one is allowed or believed to have experienced one.
Thank you, Heidi, for your rational post. Each person’s biochemistry is unique to that person – hence, a ‘one size fits all’ treatment is bound to fail.
It is shocking that anyone who even questions the ‘mandated narratives’ is categorized as spreading either mis- or dis-information. Anyone who has a different opinion is treated as a conspirationist or domestic terrorist. Why is this happening in America?
It stands to reason that any risk(s), potential or otherwise, must be disclosed in full detail to the public.
Where there is RISK, there must be CHOICE.
True FREEDOM includes the RIGHT to say NO.
They aren’t actually thought of as potential side effects. Every medical event that follows a vaccination has not necessarily been caused by that vaccination. As I said above, if I take two ibuprofen and find out I have cancer the next week, that doesn’t mean it’s caused by the pills. If you are looking at millions of people you’d expect that many thousands of health issues would come up in weeks following vaccination. Just as they would if you followed the unVaccinated.
Several side effects have been acknowledged. The most severe being myocarditis and clotting. But to say that there are 1296 side effects is just not true.
Jenny, this list is part of the official data release from Pfizer. It has nothing to do with the VAERS system that anyone is welcome to report their suspected side effect to.
https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/List-of-Adverse-Events.pdf
It is labeled as Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) and is specifically a list of potential adverse events that Pfizer scientists believe could occur after vaccination. This is coming from Pfizer itself, so that part is absolutely true. Each event experienced goes through further investigation to determine the likelihood that it was triggered by the vaccine. This list is part of the hundreds of thousands of pages of data that Pfizer was court ordered to release in a timely fashion. They originally were fighting to be given 75 years to release all of the data, which should render us all speechless, no matter if we are vaccine advocates or not.
“Pfizer scientists believe could occur after vaccination.” Is not a particularly accurate statement.
Pfizer wrote:
— The company’s AESI list takes into consideration the lists of AESIs from the following expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished guideline).
— The AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general.
— The AESI list is comprised of MedDRA PTs, HLTs, HLGTs or MedDRA SMQs and can be changed as appropriate based on the evolving safety profile of the vaccine.
“The more a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.” (George Orwell)
Sad, but unfortunately true.
The “tabletop simulation” that took place in March 2021 used monkeypox as the cause of a simulated pandemic, which first appeared in ‘Brinia’ on 07May2022. Interestingly the first incident of monkeypox occurred in Britain on 07May2022. Coincidence?
my name is Stephanie Vinson and I’m from Texas I’m one of these vaccine injury I’m paralyzed from waist down 44 years old I was diagnosed after been in hospital for 28 days with transverse myelitis I have prematurely in a wheelchair there been no help 700 thousand dollars in doctors bills can’t work my husband is a disabled veteran I just wanted to say thank you for writing about it
Stephanie, your post is heartwrenching and helps us realize that serious adverse events do happen to real people. Thank you for sharing.
The dogmatism of those in denial is simply astonishing in the face of so much scientific and anecdotal evidence. If you are interested in natural remedies, all scientifically proven, please check out Orthomolecular Medicine. It is a great site with highly qualified membership, and access is free. I sincerely hope that you remain positive in the face of such adversity. There is always hope, please believe that. May the Universe rain blessings on you and help you recover. All the very best to you and your husband.
The FDA’s policy of shots first, questions later, does not allow for informed consent“On June 28, 2022, FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) met to vote on COVID strain replacement in the shots. Stand for Health Freedom was selected to make oral public comment at the meeting.”
Many would agree that the policy of ‘jabs first, questions later’ is medically unethical and irresponsible. Check out the above, it is for real. It begs the question: do they deserve our trust?
Stand for Health Freedom has shown courage and deserves our gratitude.
Do we honestly believe that US is still a democracy and upholds its Constitution which protects citizens’ rights?
“The FDA’s policy of shots first, questions later, does not allow for informed consent.”
“On June 28, 2022, FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) met to vote on COVID strain replacement in the shots. Stand for Health Freedom was selected to make oral public comment at the meeting.”
Many would agree that the policy of ‘jabs first, questions later’ is medically unethical and irresponsible. Check out the above, it is for real. It begs the question: do they deserve our trust?
Stand for Health Freedom has shown courage and deserves our gratitude.
Clearly, jab mandates have caused injury or death. To dismiss these as ‘rare’ or ‘statistically insignificant” is inhumane and unethical. One victim is one too many.
Where there is RISK, there must be CHOICE.
True FREEDOM includes the RIGHT to say NO.
What an amazing article Heidi, a great resource (in print) speaking frankly about something that is so far beyond perplexing to me… From the vantage points of a vaccination injured person, I will share my views. I have been termed anti-Jbb, there is a difference. ~08 H1N1 timeframe, flooo shot, caught pneumonia from it, treated with Cipro (ruined my tendons, connective tissues, as an advanced bodybuilder of 20 years) I digress. I got really, really sick. Sadly Allopathic medical practice could not define, reason my state or help me.
*My reaction to Adjuvant: Squalene: Demyelination: G.B.S., with serious bilateral coordination issues, over time evolving into more MS like symptoms. The treatment = antivirals . . . a vicious loop, I wanted no part of. **Please understand, I am not groping for sympathy. It was the worst single decision of my life!
This is why I CANNOT IMAGINE HOW anyone could reason the choice to experiment wildly, possibly / quite likely experience the ranges of unacceptable symptoms covered so thoroughly in this well researched and written article (thank you). I came to / found this article by studying 1P63 gene delation… could not help but read, agree and comment. PEOPLE NEED TO STUDY, before rolling up their sleeves.
spell check manages to mangle expressions [1P36 gene deletion]