Opinion: The truth behind the ‘safe and effective’ Pfizer vaccine includes 1,291 side effects and counting

Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine

If for some reason you aren’t aware of the recent release of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine safety data, then I’d say the 24/7 mainstream media coverage of the Russia/Ukraine conflict is doing its job.  

Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
Click to open PDF

At first glance, it is tragically obvious why the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested a ridiculous window of 75 years to release all the Pfizer vaccine data. Conveniently, most of the people affected by the questionable jab would be dead by then. Thankfully, US District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas believed the release of this data to be “paramount to public importance,” and required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released. This shortens the full release of all pertinent data to around eight months. 

After nearly a year of being pestered, shamed, coerced and guilted into receiving one of the COVID-19 vaccines, Joe Biden on Jan. 4, had the nerve to say there is “no excuse for anyone being unvaccinated.” With the proof in black and white from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration itself, we actually have 1,291 “excuses” to remain unvaccinated, Mr. President.  

Heidi Wetzler, administrator, ClarkCountyToday.com
Heidi Wetzler, administrator, ClarkCountyToday.com

I cannot find words strong enough to express my anger. How many times have we heard the words “safe and effective” coming from our leaders in reference to vaccines? The recently released information includes 42,086 serious case reports, occurring in the first three months of the vaccine rollout and summarized in nine single-spaced pages entitled “Adverse Events of Special Interest.”  Which means, since the end of February 2021, these side effects have been known. Yet to this day, all we hear from medical professionals, and those in public health authority is that the vaccines are safe. Additionally, there is the truly outrageous fact that the vaccine companies are completely immune from liability.  

The first adverse event on the list is a chromosome disorder called 1p36 deletion syndrome.  The definition is as follows: A chromosome disorder is a change in chromosome number or structure which results in a set of features or symptoms. People with 1p36 deletion syndrome have lost a small but variable amount of genetic material from one of their 46 chromosomes.  

Remember when all those conspiracy theorists were posting their concerns that the new mRNA technology could change one’s DNA? And then all the “fact-checkers” were working overtime to label those dangerous posts as misinformation? But all the while, the FDA knew that this syndrome was a possible side effect of the vaccine.  

The list of hard-to-pronounce adverse events is presented in alphabetical order. A few I picked out that sounded familiar are arterial thrombosis, autoimmune endocrine disorder, cardiopulmonary failure, central nervous system lupus, colitis ulcerative, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, myocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, testicular autoimmunity, and vagus nerve paralysis. The events were classified as either serious or non-serious, however only serious cases were included in the report. There were over 22,000 serious general disorders reported, 14,000 serious nervous system disturbances, 8,000 serious musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders and 7,000 serious gastrointestinal disorders. The words autoimmune and thrombosis showed up a lot on the list. There were 270 “spontaneous abortions.”  

Administrator Heidi Wetzler shines a light on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s release of data that reveals adverse effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
Click to open PDF

As I reviewed the list, I was ignorantly shocked that there were even 1,300 different health diagnoses, let alone nearly 1,300 potential side effects for one vaccine. And the only word we ever heard them utter, was “safe.” How is everyone involved still walking around freely? There were also over 1,200 deaths reported in those first three months. Whether every death was undeniably caused by the vaccine, we will probably never know. But the possibility absolutely should have been disclosed. Informed consent was criminally absent. And even more sickening is that not one governing body has the integrity to be responsible. Not one honorable person or entity has the decency to say, “the buck stops here.” This is a heinous crime and I fear that no one will ever pay.  

Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said this in a recent interview, “So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way.” So, this woman can flippantly make this statement and that’s it? Thousands have been killed, maimed and permanently disabled from these vaccines and it’s because “the science” was too optimistic? Millions and millions have injected something into their bodies that they were told was safe.  

There was a National Terrorism advisory bulletin put out by the Department of Homeland Security on Feb. 7.  It states: The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence.   

How are the citizens of the United States of America supposed to interpret this bulletin, when the actors undermining public trust in the government are coming from the government itself? The irony would be comedic, if it wasn’t so utterly terrifying. Social media platforms have been censoring and labeling posts expressing concerns with the safety of the vaccines as false information, for the last two years. So, who exactly has been the bearer of truth in instructing them to do so? Where are the investigative journalists whose sole responsibility it is to flesh out these truths? Sadly, the answer is that they are weak, lazy, unprincipled people — sleepwalking their way to their paychecks from the propaganda machines. They are the ones continually repeating misinformation. We are a lost nation without true independent journalists.  

Another bit of misleading information the CDC has promoted since day 1, is that the vaccines are 95 percent effective. I would imagine most people would hear that number and think that they are protected 95 percent of the time. But this number is the Relative Risk Reduction and not the Absolute Risk Reduction. In the Pfizer vaccine trial, eight people out of 18,198 people in the vaccinated group contracted COVID. And 162 out of 18,325 people in the unvaccinated contracted COVID.  So, the risk of getting COVID if you were unvaccinated was .88 percent, and the risk if you were vaccinated was .04 percent. So, the published 95 percent refers to the relative difference between .88 percent and .04 percent. This reveals that the Absolute Risk Reduction for contracting COVID after receiving the vaccine, was less than 1 percent.  

I wonder what kind of vaccine compliance there would have been if everyone had access to the truth. What if people had known that the vaccine was protecting them from contracting COVID only 1 percent more than if they were unvaccinated? What if people had been handed a list of 1,291 potential side effects, many serious and disabling, before they rolled up their sleeves. This crime against humanity is egregious. 

In contrast, these are the serious side effects listed for outlawed Ivermectin: fever, blistering or peeling skin, rash, hives and itching. Good thing we have the experts keeping us safe. Remember, if there are effective treatments for a disease,  new vaccines will not be approved. Oh, and Pfizer is set to profit 36 billion dollars in 2022.  

To add insult to injury, the WHO is actively working on a pandemic pact, which is an international agreement regarding the prevention and control of future pandemics. You know, like a future pandemic Bill Gates recently stated was coming and would be worse than COVID. I wonder how he knows. This pact would allow the WHO to override a nation’s constitution during a pandemic. With the information we now have regarding the murderous lack of transparency during the managing of the COVID-19 pandemic and forced vaccination program, I pray that this will never happen.  

To wrap this up, am I the only one who missed the international celebration for conquering the pandemic? Where is Dr. Fauci and why isn’t he taking his victory lap? Maybe these 1,300 side effects have something to do with his disappearance. For two years all we heard about every single day from the mainstream media was COVID, COVID, COVID, and then poof, nothing. Vaccine passports are ending. Mask mandates are disappearing. Why isn’t the fact that the CDC and FDA lied incessantly about the safety of the vaccines part of the mainstream news cycle?  Why isn’t it front and center day in and day out? And if you are still sold out to the “cause?” I encourage you to put aside what you’ve been led to believe for the last two years and think critically. What else are they lying about? 

Also read:

Receive comment notifications
Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x