Area resident and former County Councilor Dick Rylander attempts to help you better understand where your taxes are going and what the future impact of new taxes may be
Dick Rylander
for Clark County Today
When we see tax proposals come to the ballot those in support frequently refer to the “rate” rather than the total dollars to be collected. This “rate” is shown as an estimate of $$$ per $1000 of assessed value. Those writing the tax proposals usually show examples of the average or median home price and then do some math to show the impact.
For instance a tax may be $1/$1000. If the home value example used is say $400,000 then the actual amount of taxes would be $1 x 400 = $400. What is the median home value in Clark County. WA estimated to be currently? (Note: median means ½ of values are higher and ½ are lower). It appears that $550,000 is a reasonable estimate.
The higher the assessed value the higher the cost to the property owner. If, in this example, the assessed value was $1,000,000 then the tax owed would be $1 x 1000 = $1,000 or 2.25x more than the $400,000 example.
In today’s market what’s the distribution of assessed values as of 2024? Are there a lot of high value homes?
The Assessors Office did some research and were able to supply the following chart. Please accept that it is an estimate and a snapshot.
There are a total of 134,488 properties. Of those it appears that there are 20,505 of $1,000,00 or more which works out to about 15.2%.
What’s the value in knowing this distribution and knowing your own assessed value (and how the taxes are distributed) you can better understand where your taxes are going and what the future impact of new taxes may be.
Also read:
- Opinion: Tax day is painful enough without Washington adding its own
Washington’s new 9.9% income tax mirrors federal pattern: start narrow, expand to hit everyone within years. - POLL: What do you believe is the biggest reason school districts are facing budget shortfalls?
Districts across Washington warn of budget gaps as debate grows over rising costs versus inadequate state funding. - Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning sign
IBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval. - Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning sign
IBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval. - Opinion: Washington fails the test for affordability
Mountain States Policy Center analysis reveals Washington ranks 5th most expensive state as residents migrate to Idaho and Texas.
wpDiscuz
