Chris Corry says the results are not surprising because a statewide vote elects the Washington State Supreme Court

Chris Corry
Washington Policy Center

An analysis released today by Ballotpedia and reported on by The Center Square demonstrates remarkable bias in donations and outcomes at The Washington State Supreme Court. 

Of donations given to winning candidates, over 99% of significant contributions were from progressive sources, while donations given to losing candidates 97% of significant contributions were from conservative sources. 

The sources for both winning and losing candidates fell largely into ideologic divides. 

The study also examined court case outcomes based on parties and amici analysis. It found that progressive parties received 72% favorable decisions from the Washington State Supreme Court. Conservative parties were much lower at 15% favorable rulings. Similar numbers were found in amici results, with progressives seeing 75% favorable rulings and conservatives with 13%. 

The results are not surprising. A statewide vote elects the Washington State Supreme Court. There is no representation based on community, population, or geography. The Washington Policy Center has long promoted a policy to change the Washington State Constitution to allow for district elections. Currently only one justice is from east of the Cascades, and that was because of an appointment by Governor Gregoire. As noted in our latest policy guide:

“To improve geographic representation on the supreme court, elections should be changed to district elections. This would provide more regional diversity and help reduce the cost of running for office, while providing candidates more time to focus on voter outreach, debates and forums in their area of the state.”

Chris Corry is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center. He is also a member of the Washington House of Representatives.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Bike lanes aren’t two-way streets
  Doug Dahl explains why riding against traffic in bike lanes creates dangerous intersection conflicts and forces cyclists into vehicle lanes.
• 
  Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement design is engineered manslaughter
  Engineer warns IBR’s planned S-curve approach will create deadly conditions worse than San Francisco’s accident-prone detour.
• 
  Opinion: DOT secretary and Maryland governor fire Key Bridge contractor
  Maryland fired their bridge contractor over cost concerns while IBR balloons to $18 billion for a shorter span.
• 
  Letter: C-TRAN makes a mess of Hazel Dell
  Vancouver resident Bob Zak criticizes C-TRAN’s Vine bus system for low ridership and ongoing construction disruptions.
• 
  Opinion: Delaying light rail offers best hope for new bridge
  Two Republican senators argue light rail should wait until Clark County voters approve funding for operations.