Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center points out that the bill would set the precedent of filling classrooms with district staff who are not qualified to teach

Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center

The text of SB 5054 proposes to re-define the meaning of “instructional hours” in state law to include the time students spend with non-teachers.  During that time their regular teachers would be absent and meeting in groups as newly-formed “professional learning communities.”

The effect of the bill would be to cut instruction time for students by four hours a week, from 30 hours to 26 hours. 

SB 5054 is being proposed as the level of academic achievement provided students in the public system is falling. For example, on the 2022 Smarter Balance state tests public schools failed to educate 62 percent of students adequately in math, and failed to educate 49 percent of students adequately in reading.  

SB 5054 would contribute to inequity in education.  Students attending private schools and charter public schools would continue to receive full instructional time with fully-qualified teachers. The bill would hurt the education of Washington’s 1.1 million K-12 students by denying them access to a quality education.  

In addition, the bill would set the precedent of filling classrooms with district staff who are not qualified to teach.  The bill would result in lower academic standards, and would deny students the public education they have been promised, at a time when school funding and teacher pay are at record-high levels.  Both trends would work to encourage more families to lose confidence in public education and to transfer their children to other schools.

For more information, here is our Legislative Memo on SB 5054: https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/sb-5054-to-cut-classroom-learning-time-in-schools-by-four-hours-a-week.  

Liv Finne is the director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Is government greed fueling the drive to defeat citizen-led ballot initiatives?
  Paul Guppy of the Washington Policy Center discusses how government greed may be fueling opposition to citizen-led ballot initiatives aimed at reducing new taxes in Washington state.
• 
  Opinion: WA Cares commission weighs in on how future recipients will be allowed to spend money
  Elizabeth New (Hovde) from the Washington Policy Center discusses the ongoing challenges with WA Cares, highlighting solvency concerns and the impact of Initiative 2124 on the program’s future.
• 
  POLL: If Tri-Mountain Golf Course were sold, how would you feel about it being developed into something else?
  Poll: How do you feel about the potential sale and development of Tri-Mountain Golf Course? Share your thoughts on this community issue!
• 
  Opinion: Fact check – Will repealing Washington’s CO2 tax harm ‘roads and bridges?’
  Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center says legislators and activists understand that residents want to improve the safety and efficiency of our transportation system Todd MyersWashington Policy Center One of the primary arguments made by supporters of Washington’s tax on CO2 emissions, called the Climate Commitment Act (CCA), is that if the state loses …
• 
  Opinion: Turn signals in parking lots
  Doug Dahl of Target Zero answers whether turn signals are required in parking lots, explaining their importance for safety and courtesy.