Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center discusses a valid concern other cities should keep in mind before following Seattle’s lead

Jason Mercier
Washington Policy Center

As expected, the state Court of Appeals today unanimously upheld Seattle’s employer compensation tax. Though the tax is a questionable economic policy, Seattle successfully threaded the legal needle to avoid the prior constitutional violations of its invalidated local income tax. From today’s Court of Appeals ruling:

“We conclude that the City’s payroll expense tax is an excise tax on businesses imposed under powers vested in the City by the state legislature and the state constitution. Engaging in business is a substantial privilege on which the City may properly levy taxes, and the use of a business’s payroll expense is an appropriate measure of that taxable incident. Unlike Cary, the City’s payroll expense tax is not a tax on employee income or the right to work for wages. Summary judgment in favor of the City was appropriate.”

Now that Seattle has received a green light for the employer compensation tax, expect conversations to quickly turn to how to increase it to respond to the city’s overspending-induced budget problem. As reported by the Seattle Times:

“’Structural problems require structural solutions, like Jumpstart, and as budget chair, that’s what I’ll be exploring as we head into the budget season this fall,’ Mosqueda said, committing to finding a ‘progressive’ revenue source, or one that is graduated based on income.”

Though some cities may take inspiration from Seattle’s tax victory and look to impose their own employer compensation taxes, pursuing this type of tax on a statewide basis was recently rejected by the Washington Tax Structure Working Group. The work group voted back in March to remove the following taxes from its possible list of recommendations to the legislature:

• Value Added Tax (VAT);

• Employer compensation tax;

• Flat or progressive corporate income tax; and

• Flat or progressive personal income tax.  

The Tax Structure Work Group consultant’s report noted that Washingtonians were opposed to the tax because of “concerns that the employer compensation tax might hinder economic growth.”

A valid concern other cities should keep in mind before following Seattle’s lead.

Jason Mercier is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Markets and innovation, not government, are the key to reducing climate change risk
  Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center states ‘the simple truth is that the more you care about climate change, the less you should rely on the promises of politicians.’
• 
  Letter: ‘I urge legislators and other community leaders to keep working together today and in the coming months to ensure more students like me can succeed in education after high school’
  Battle Ground resident Jaelyn Sotelo shares her thoughts on the need to expand access to financial aid and other support for students.
• 
  Opinion: Washington minimum wage for 2023 to be $15.74 per hour
  Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center points out that the results of a high artificial minimum wage are exactly the opposite of the proponents desired result.
• 
  POLL: Did the Clark County Council make the right decision when creating a new Jail Services Department, taking management of the jail away from the Sheriff’s Office?
  Did the Clark County Council make the right decision when creating a new Jail Services Department, taking management of the jail away from the Sheriff’s Office?
• 
  Opinion: Next step for Inslee’s permanent vaccine mandate
  Elizabeth Hovde shares why the Washington Policy Center recommends the Legislature repeal this mandate when it meets this coming January.