Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center discusses a valid concern other cities should keep in mind before following Seattle’s lead

Jason Mercier
Washington Policy Center

As expected, the state Court of Appeals today unanimously upheld Seattle’s employer compensation tax. Though the tax is a questionable economic policy, Seattle successfully threaded the legal needle to avoid the prior constitutional violations of its invalidated local income tax. From today’s Court of Appeals ruling:

“We conclude that the City’s payroll expense tax is an excise tax on businesses imposed under powers vested in the City by the state legislature and the state constitution. Engaging in business is a substantial privilege on which the City may properly levy taxes, and the use of a business’s payroll expense is an appropriate measure of that taxable incident. Unlike Cary, the City’s payroll expense tax is not a tax on employee income or the right to work for wages. Summary judgment in favor of the City was appropriate.”

Now that Seattle has received a green light for the employer compensation tax, expect conversations to quickly turn to how to increase it to respond to the city’s overspending-induced budget problem. As reported by the Seattle Times:

“’Structural problems require structural solutions, like Jumpstart, and as budget chair, that’s what I’ll be exploring as we head into the budget season this fall,’ Mosqueda said, committing to finding a ‘progressive’ revenue source, or one that is graduated based on income.”

Though some cities may take inspiration from Seattle’s tax victory and look to impose their own employer compensation taxes, pursuing this type of tax on a statewide basis was recently rejected by the Washington Tax Structure Working Group. The work group voted back in March to remove the following taxes from its possible list of recommendations to the legislature:

• Value Added Tax (VAT);

• Employer compensation tax;

• Flat or progressive corporate income tax; and

• Flat or progressive personal income tax.  

The Tax Structure Work Group consultant’s report noted that Washingtonians were opposed to the tax because of “concerns that the employer compensation tax might hinder economic growth.”

A valid concern other cities should keep in mind before following Seattle’s lead.

Jason Mercier is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Letter: ‘Anyone from the majority party listening?’
  In a letter to the editor, area resident Bob Zak argues that HB 1163 is unconstitutional and criticizes the legislative majority for supporting it.
• 
  POLL: Should the I-5 Bridge project be paused over cost and bidding concerns?
  Clark County Today’s weekly poll asks whether the I-5 Bridge replacement should be paused as questions grow around rising costs and a lack of competitive bids.
• 
  Opinion: 18th District Sen. Adrian Cortes explains positions on legislation he voted on
  Dick Rylander shares responses from Sen. Adrian Cortes about his votes and reasoning on major legislation this session.
• 
  Opinion: ‘I’m more than just a little skeptical that IBR officials are doing everything they can to limit the cost of this project’
  Ken Vance shares his concerns over rising costs and limited contractor interest in the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.
• 
  Letter: ‘IBR has relied on this video to instill fear in the public and government officials to promote the construction of a new bridge’
  Bob Ortblad questions IBR’s use of a seismic video and urges a shift toward tunnel alternatives in this critical letter to the editor.