Liv Finne believes one of the main reasons polls show a loss of faith in so many of our public institutions is the decline in the quality of public education and the trend of parents pulling their children out of the system

Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center

Yesterday Senator Lisa Wellman (D-Mercer Island), chair of the Senate Education Committee, led majority Democrats on her committee in passing ESHB 2331.  The bill would give a statewide executive branch official, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, new authority to cut the funding of any school that he deems is not requiring Critical Race Theory (CRT), Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) or Queer Theory (QT) lessons in the classroom.

Details on the bill and its potential impact on funding cuts is provided in our Legislative Memo analysis.  The funding-reduction authority is presented in Section 1, Subsection 2 of the bill.

Republicans on the Committee sought to protect school children from exposure to hurtful ideologies in the classroom.  Senator Jim McCune (R-Graham) proposed Amendment A, to prohibit school districts from approving instruction materials that are “lewd, obscene or pornographic.”  The amendment sought to keep school materials age-appropriate for children, more like “G” or “PG” rather than, “R” and “NC-17.”

Senator McCune described some of harmful classroom materials that would be required under ESHB 2331, as reported on TVW at Time Stamp 1:43:29 (https://tvw.org/video/senate-early-learning-k-12-education-2024021313/?eventID=2024021313.) 

Senator Wellman recommended a “No” vote and Amendment A was defeated.  The committee majority then voted to pass the underlying bill and send it to the full Senate for passage.

Senator Wellman said the bill would not undermine a local school district’s control over its own classroom materials.  This statement is not true.  The bill would cancel local control over instructional materials and give veto power to the state superintendent.  Anyone in doubt is invited to read the text of the bill (see ESHB 2331, Section 1, Subsection 2).

One of the main reasons polls show a loss of faith in so many of our public institutions is the decline in the quality of public education and the trend of parents pulling their children out of the system (Washington public schools have lost 46,000 families over the last few years).

Another reason is the increasingly common experience of hearing a public official say her proposed bill would do one thing, only to find on reading the bill that it would actually do the opposite.

Liv Finne is the director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
  Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.
• 
  Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
  Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.
• 
  Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
  Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
• 
  Opinion: Washingtonians want affordability, not more taxes, according to our recent survey
  Rep. John Ley shares results from a legislative survey showing affordability concerns and opposition to new taxes among respondents, while outlining Republican priorities in Olympia.
• 
  Opinion: Schumer insults black Americans with ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ comment
  Lars Larson argues that Democratic opposition to the SAVE Act contradicts voter support for photo ID requirements and unfairly characterizes minority voters.