John A. Charles Jr. questions why there are no efforts underway to plan for the next generation of great roads
John A. Charles Jr.
Cascade Policy Institute
The last segment of Oregon’s Interstate Highway system opened in 1982. One would think that since Oregon has a nationally prominent planning system, there would be efforts underway to plan for the next generation of great roads.
But that is not the case. Planners almost universally hate highways, so they have made sure that the Interstate system remains stagnant. Even where changes are being contemplated, such as a new I-5 bridge over the Columbia River, they are not designed to address growth.
The Interstate Bridge Replacement Project, now in its 26th year of planning, will have no effect on traffic congestion because it doesn’t add capacity. We will still have only two bridges over the Columbia River in the Portland region.
What we need is several new bridges, with at least one providing a direct, high-speed connection to HWY 26 on the west side. We need new bridges and highways for the same reasons that cities eventually need new streets – you can’t pack every urban activity into one small area.
The Oregon Transportation Commission is determined to impose highway tolls without providing motorists with new highways. This is the wrong approach. If the Commission wants public support, it should start planning for the new roads the public wants.
John A. Charles, Jr. is President and CEO of Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.
Also read:
- Opinion: Position Three – Constitution over politics
Three candidates vie for a Washington Supreme Court seat — and one was elected, not appointed. - Opinion: Don’t blame AI – Why electricity rates are rising in Washington
State climate mandates, not AI or data centers, are the primary force pushing Washington utility bills higher. - Opinion: The Declaration of Independence – Its debt to history and meaning
Rob Natelson traces the Declaration’s roots to English petitions, the 1689 Bill of Rights, and natural law philosophy. - Opinion: More employers mean more opportunities for workers
A Washington Policy Center analyst argues that fewer employers directly means fewer choices and less power for workers. - Letter: Are all religious viewpoints relative and equally valid?
Randall Rathbun challenges Silas Matson and Rev. Kate Lore on whether objective moral truth exists.
