Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center outlines the four new groups of Washington state workers are eligible for an exemption
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
The exemption window has now closed for people who had private long-term-care insurance that allowed them to be exempt from a payroll tax beginning in July.
Workers — low-income ones, included — will be forced to give 58 cents of every $100 they earn to a state social program set up to help fund long-term care (assistance with daily living). They might not ever need or benefit from the program or see a return on their investment, and money taken from them will often go to others with more resources. The state-imposed program, called WA Cares, is a safety net for those in need and those not in need. It is misguided policy in every way.
Repeal legislation has been filed (House Bill 1011). That should be attractive to all state lawmakers, especially after seeing how unpopular the program they set up is, how it will harm workers and how many tweaks are being made to the poorly written law. Instead, many seem to be on board with a robust information campaign in play.
The final-final numbers are not yet available, but as of Dec. 15, the Employment Security Department (ESD) said the total number of exemption applications it had received was 482,381. The number of those approved was 478,481. (There were still some applications left to process and some are considered incomplete.)
Now, because of legislation that passed a year ago in an attempt to make the law more palatable, four new groups of Washington state workers are eligible for exemption. They include people who:
- Live outside of the state.
- Are the spouse or registered domestic partner of an active-duty service member of the United States armed forces.
- Have non-immigrant work visas.
- Are veterans with a 70% service-connected disability rating or higher.
Only “voluntary exemptions” are available to these groups, however. That might keep some paying into WA Cares, even though the state knows they aren’t eligible for program benefits from the outset. The new workers who can get out of this burdensome tax can jump through state hoops and apply here: wacaresfund.wa.gov/apply-for-an-exemption/.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: The unpreferred and unaffordable Interstate Bridge replacement proposal
Rep. John Ley argues that the Interstate Bridge Replacement proposal is unpreferred, unaffordable, and failing to address congestion, cost transparency, and community concerns. - POLL: If project costs continue to rise, what should lawmakers do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan?
This poll asks readers what lawmakers should do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan as costs rise and key decisions remain unresolved. - Opinion: IBR still holding and lying about coming billions in cost overruns
Joe Cortright argues that Interstate Bridge Replacement officials are deliberately delaying the release of an updated cost estimate that he says could push the project toward $10 billion. - Opinion: Another problem with strike pay from the UI fund – Potential double-dipping, overpayments
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s new strike pay law risks overpayments and double-dipping unless workers are clearly warned at the point of applying for unemployment benefits. - Letter: A call for competent Interstate Bridge project management
Rick Vermeers argues that unchecked scope, rising costs, and missed timelines threaten the survival of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project unless light rail is removed.
