OFM was withholding from a public records request contract negotiation documents between the state and public sector unions
Chris Corry
Washington Policy Center
As initially reported by the Washington Policy Center, The Citizen Action Defense Fund (CADF) won a public records lawsuit against The Office of Financial Management (OFM).
OFM was withholding from a public records request contract negotiation documents between the state and public sector unions. As noted in the CADF request, the Public Records Act had no limitations on public records related to contract negotiations. A Thurston County Superior Court Judge agreed.
The amended penalty ruling issued 5/24/23 ordered OFM to pay attorneys’ fees in the amount of $32,115.13, costs of $1,057.38 for a total of $33,172.51. This does not include the statutory penalty of $6 per day which as of the court order was $1,104.00.
CADF’s director Jackson Maynard remarked:
“The court’s final order holds the Governor’s Office of Financial Management accountable and demonstrates that he violated the letter and spirit of the Public Records Act. We look forward to receiving the check with our fees, costs, and penalties and as well as the records the court ruled were illegally withheld, but are prepared if the State decides to continue to contest this matter.”
OFM’s refusal to comply with the Public Records Act is now costing the taxpayers almost $35,000.
There are other examples of the state attempting to withhold records from public disclosure, and the legal challenges that have followed. As noted in the article there are a variety of benefits for increased public transparency and open government.
Additional proposals have been introduced to help citizens looking to access public records. WPC’s Jason Mercier provided insight into this legislation and why it is needed in a recent opinion editorial.
Chris Corry is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center. He is also a member of the Washington state House of Representatives.
Also read:
- Opinion: The income tax passed the House – what’s next?
Washington House approved a new tax despite bipartisan opposition; business leaders and residents signal economic impact and looming legal fights. - Opinion: Washington’s fight for liberty
Conservative columnist Nancy Churchill argues that despite the passage of a new 9.9% state income tax, signs of shifting political momentum in Washington state give reason for hope and continued action. - Opinion: Brandi Kruse and I are feeling discouraged but we’re planning to continue advocating for political change. Will you?
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a discouraging week in Washington state politics, echoing Brandi Kruse’s frustrations over Democrats’ state income tax victory and local decisions on transit and ICE while urging conservatives not to give up on advocating for political change. - Opinion: ‘My thoughts on yesterday’s tragic state income tax’
Leslie Lewallen argues Democrats passed an unconstitutional “millionaires tax” on March 10, 2026, rejected more than 70 Republican amendments, and set Washington on a path she says will harm jobs, schools, and families statewide. - Opinion: Starbucks founder flees the new NW tax hell
Lars Larson argues that Howard and Sheri Schultz are leaving the Pacific Northwest for Miami following Washington’s new millionaires tax and rapid state budget growth in Oregon and Washington.
