Chris Corry addresses one of the biggest questions that has arisen from the new rules for the Washington capital gains income tax
Chris Corry
Washington Policy Center
As the state begins developing new rules for the Washington capital gains income tax, various questions are being raised on the details of this new tax and how to apply the domicile rules correctly.
One of the biggest questions that has arisen is how Washington defines domicile. While the rules are still being drafted, tax attorneys at Lane Powell have created an eight-page checklist of factors related a taxpayer’s domicile.
While it would seem excessive to need an eight-page list, the domicile rules by the Department of Revenue are very presumptive of Washington domicile and require significant proof on the taxpayer’s part to prove they are no longer domiciled in the state. This creates complex scenarios for taxpayers.
As noted in the article:
“With respect to gains from the sale of tangible personal property, if the property is moved out of Washington at least two years prior to the sale of the property, the gains will not be allocated to Washington. In this case, the two years include the current taxable year and the immediately preceding taxable year.”
The example cited in the initial rulemaking was a Washington-domiciled resident selling coins in Nevada.
For the above example, to not incur the capital gains tax, the coins must be moved out of the state for two years before being sold. How Washington can apply an “excise tax” on a transaction outside its borders remains to be answered.
The guidance for clearing this domicile hurdle is complex. Per the authors:
“The key to an easy/favorable resolution in allocating long-term gains from intangible property is clear and convincing evidence that you have abandoned your Washington domicile with the burden on the party asserting the change, which is usually the taxpayer. To change domicile, a taxpayer not only needs to leave Washington but also must establish a new domicile. Completing this checklist and maintaining (in readily accessible files) evidence of all actions taken, including printouts of computer pages and emails, can help with both the assessment of the taxpayer’s domicile and carrying the burden of proof if there is a dispute with the tax authorities.”
The article and checklist can be found here.
Chris Corry is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center. He is also a member of the Washington State House of Representatives.
Also read:
- Opinion: The 2025 Tax Tsunami in Washington state
David Boze of the Washington Policy Center warns that Washington state’s 2025 legislative session delivered the largest tax hike in state history despite already rising revenues. - Opinion: An accusation of ‘multiple inaccuracies and defamatory statements’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance shares the full details of a critical exchange with IBR Program Administrator Greg Johnson, who objected to claims made in a recent column about the light rail and bridge project. - Letter: Follow the moneyAnna Miller alleges that certain disruptive protests are backed by coordinated funding networks, including foreign-linked entities and U.S. nonprofits.
- Opinion: Political motivated violence from the left is replacing discourse at a troubling rateBill Bruch warns that targeted violence against elected officials is replacing political discourse, as attacks on Democrats who break party lines raise serious national concerns.
- Opinion: Tell city officials to keep Vancouver ‘normal’Amy Harris urges Vancouver residents to speak out against expanding homeless encampments and support stronger public camping regulations to keep the city safe and livable.
