Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center shares why heavy union politicking in election season offers a reminder why being a member of a public union should be voluntary, not compulsory
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Not political? Not so much. Unions are very active in politics. Their members’ money and time go to candidates they want to win.
While politicking for candidates you believe in makes sense, it doesn’t feel good for some public employees to watch their money being used to tell them or others that they should vote for someone whose politics don’t line up with their own. OpenSecrets says that total labor-sector campaign contributions peaked in 2016 and almost 90 percent of contributions went to Democrats, which is consistent with at least two decades of labor contribution trends.
The Washington State Labor Council has been recruiting volunteers for a full calendar of events all fall to support labor-endorsed candidates. (See the list of the WSLC’s 2022 election endorsements here.) There are “labor neighbor” walks in several communities again this weekend.
Heavy union politicking in election season offers an excellent reminder why being a member of a public union should be voluntary, not compulsory. And it is. But many public workers still don’t know that they have this ideological freedom.
In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Janus v. AFSCME that public employees are no longer required to pay union dues or fees as a condition of employment. The Supreme Court staff summarized the decision this way: “The First Amendment is violated when money is taken from nonconsenting employees for a public-sector union; employees must choose to support the union before anything is taken from them. Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.”
If you’re a public employee who tires of seeing your union dues going to politicking with which you disagree, or if you feel unrepresented by your union, learn more about how to exercise your constitutional rights at optouttoday.com.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: Attorneys debrief capital gains income tax state Supreme Court oral arguments
Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center interviews two of the lead attorneys in the capital gains income tax case currently before the Washington state Supreme Court. - Letter: ‘If we do vote for the schools to have more funding, we can help students get a better education’Vancouver resident Ellee Nichols offers her support for the Vancouver Public Schools levy on the Feb. 14 special election ballot.
- POLL: Are you in favor of a proposal from Democratic lawmakers that would require Washington residents to vote in every major election?Are you in favor of a proposal from Democratic lawmakers that would require Washington residents to vote in every major election?
- Opinion: Low-income tax credit now available in WashingtonJason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center believes lawmakers finally funding this low-income tax relief program is a cause for celebration.
- Opinion: Abortion bills move forward, including SB 5242, eliminating cost-sharing for enrolleesElizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center explains that dictating what insurers cover and what their copays and deductibles look like impacts all those who buy insurance and pay premiums in Washington state.
