Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center shares why heavy union politicking in election season offers a reminder why being a member of a public union should be voluntary, not compulsory
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Not political? Not so much. Unions are very active in politics. Their members’ money and time go to candidates they want to win.
While politicking for candidates you believe in makes sense, it doesn’t feel good for some public employees to watch their money being used to tell them or others that they should vote for someone whose politics don’t line up with their own. OpenSecrets says that total labor-sector campaign contributions peaked in 2016 and almost 90 percent of contributions went to Democrats, which is consistent with at least two decades of labor contribution trends.
The Washington State Labor Council has been recruiting volunteers for a full calendar of events all fall to support labor-endorsed candidates. (See the list of the WSLC’s 2022 election endorsements here.) There are “labor neighbor” walks in several communities again this weekend.
Heavy union politicking in election season offers an excellent reminder why being a member of a public union should be voluntary, not compulsory. And it is. But many public workers still don’t know that they have this ideological freedom.
In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Janus v. AFSCME that public employees are no longer required to pay union dues or fees as a condition of employment. The Supreme Court staff summarized the decision this way: “The First Amendment is violated when money is taken from nonconsenting employees for a public-sector union; employees must choose to support the union before anything is taken from them. Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.”
If you’re a public employee who tires of seeing your union dues going to politicking with which you disagree, or if you feel unrepresented by your union, learn more about how to exercise your constitutional rights at optouttoday.com.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: The income tax passed the House – what’s next?
Washington House approved a new tax despite bipartisan opposition; business leaders and residents signal economic impact and looming legal fights. - Opinion: Washington’s fight for liberty
Conservative columnist Nancy Churchill argues that despite the passage of a new 9.9% state income tax, signs of shifting political momentum in Washington state give reason for hope and continued action. - Opinion: Brandi Kruse and I are feeling discouraged but we’re planning to continue advocating for political change. Will you?
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a discouraging week in Washington state politics, echoing Brandi Kruse’s frustrations over Democrats’ state income tax victory and local decisions on transit and ICE while urging conservatives not to give up on advocating for political change. - Opinion: ‘My thoughts on yesterday’s tragic state income tax’
Leslie Lewallen argues Democrats passed an unconstitutional “millionaires tax” on March 10, 2026, rejected more than 70 Republican amendments, and set Washington on a path she says will harm jobs, schools, and families statewide. - Opinion: Starbucks founder flees the new NW tax hell
Lars Larson argues that Howard and Sheri Schultz are leaving the Pacific Northwest for Miami following Washington’s new millionaires tax and rapid state budget growth in Oregon and Washington.
