Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center states how coercing people to get boosters with taxpayer dollars — and giving some workers who want boosters incentives for doing so — is ethically questionable
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Last week, I asked Gov. Jay Inslee’s press secretary for an update on what incentives were going to be offered, at taxpayer expense, to state workers who get COVID-19 booster shots. Mike Faulk told me, “Options are still being discussed. There aren’t details to confirm at this point.”
There still aren’t details from the governor’s office about how the state plans to incentivize state workers to get boosters instead of requiring them, as outlined in a recent governor directive. But Brandi Kruse, host of the [un]Divided podcast, details that she was leaked internal documents between labor unions and the state that say some workers might be offered $1,000 for getting the shot.
Read more about how Inslee’s June 30 booster requirement became a booster incentive in labor negotiations here. Union negotiations shouldn’t be guiding public health policy, but they appear to be when it comes to boosters. The booster mandate should have crumbled all on its own.
While incentivizing COVID-19 shots is nothing new — our state went wild with incentives for getting vaccinated in 2021, after all — the ethics of the practice is debatable and the fairness behind the policy clearly questionable.
Even the wisdom behind a booster-incentive program is knocked out by the number of boosted people testing positive for COVID-19. Vaccines and boosters don’t stop spread or contraction of the disease, and even boosted individuals can get sick and die with COVID-19. King County reports COVID-19 outcomes according to vaccination status and has consistently found that boosted individuals are testing positive for COVID-19 more often than fully vaccinated people. (See the numbers here. Fully vaccinated and boosted individuals do test positive less often than unvaccinated people.)
It is time to follow the science and honor patient-centered decisions about COVID-19 vaccines. Coercing people to get boosters with taxpayer dollars — and giving some workers who want boosters incentives for doing so — is ethically questionable, will bring no demonstrable public health benefit and would be highly wasteful. It’s such a nonsensical idea one has to wonder if incentives are simply a plan to get like-minded public employees more money, not to get an already vaccinated group more tools in the fight against COVID-19.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: State is gathering stories about long-term careElizabeth New (Hovde) of the Washington Policy Center believes lawmakers should focus on strengthening the Medicaid safety net by passing reforms that end abuse of a program meant for the vulnerable.
- Letter: Strong public schools build strong communities!Ridgefield resident Michele Wollert offers her support for the Ridgefield School District bond proposals in the April 23 special election.
- Opinion: There are plenty of ways to reduce the cost of the I-5 Bridge replacement projectClark County Today Editor Ken Vance shares ways the proposed I-5 Bridge replacement project price tag can be trimmed.
- Opinion: Ridgefield School District decisions impact capacity and overcrowdingRidgefield School District has partially created its own capacity and overcrowding issues, according to Ridgefield resident Heidi Pozzo in the latest of her assessments of the district’s school bond proposal for the April 23 special election.
- Opinion: Upper Columbia River – The Human Health AssessmentNancy Churchill offers the fourth of a series of articles about the proposed EPA Superfund site on the upper Columbia River.