Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center states how coercing people to get boosters with taxpayer dollars — and giving some workers who want boosters incentives for doing so — is ethically questionable
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Last week, I asked Gov. Jay Inslee’s press secretary for an update on what incentives were going to be offered, at taxpayer expense, to state workers who get COVID-19 booster shots. Mike Faulk told me, “Options are still being discussed. There aren’t details to confirm at this point.”
There still aren’t details from the governor’s office about how the state plans to incentivize state workers to get boosters instead of requiring them, as outlined in a recent governor directive. But Brandi Kruse, host of the [un]Divided podcast, details that she was leaked internal documents between labor unions and the state that say some workers might be offered $1,000 for getting the shot.
Read more about how Inslee’s June 30 booster requirement became a booster incentive in labor negotiations here. Union negotiations shouldn’t be guiding public health policy, but they appear to be when it comes to boosters. The booster mandate should have crumbled all on its own.
While incentivizing COVID-19 shots is nothing new — our state went wild with incentives for getting vaccinated in 2021, after all — the ethics of the practice is debatable and the fairness behind the policy clearly questionable.
Even the wisdom behind a booster-incentive program is knocked out by the number of boosted people testing positive for COVID-19. Vaccines and boosters don’t stop spread or contraction of the disease, and even boosted individuals can get sick and die with COVID-19. King County reports COVID-19 outcomes according to vaccination status and has consistently found that boosted individuals are testing positive for COVID-19 more often than fully vaccinated people. (See the numbers here. Fully vaccinated and boosted individuals do test positive less often than unvaccinated people.)
It is time to follow the science and honor patient-centered decisions about COVID-19 vaccines. Coercing people to get boosters with taxpayer dollars — and giving some workers who want boosters incentives for doing so — is ethically questionable, will bring no demonstrable public health benefit and would be highly wasteful. It’s such a nonsensical idea one has to wonder if incentives are simply a plan to get like-minded public employees more money, not to get an already vaccinated group more tools in the fight against COVID-19.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- POLL: Who should have the primary say in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school?
Clark County Today is asking readers who should have the primary role in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school. - Opinion: Study shows 2025’s record tax increases reduce Washington’s GDP growth and worker pay
Todd Myers writes that a new economic analysis projects Washington’s 2025 tax increases will slow GDP growth and reduce wages over the next several years. - Letter: Facts aren’t political
Brian Kendall writes that disagreements about the LEOFF 1 pension debate should begin with accurate facts rather than misinformation. - Opinion: Trails, roadways and crosswalks
Doug Dahl explains how Washington law treats hiking trails that cross roadways and whether pedestrians automatically have the right-of-way. - Opinion: Supreme Court’s ruling should end state’s bullying of the La Center School District
Ken Vance argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental rights in education could influence the ongoing dispute between the La Center School District and Washington state officials over gender pronoun policies.
