Mark Harmsworth says policymakers should reject this bill and embrace policies that empower businesses to respond to market signals, ensuring abundance and affordability for all Washingtonians
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
House Bill 2481 (HB 2481), introduced by Representative Mary Fosse (D), represents a misguided attempt to limit the free-market under the guise of consumer protection. Titled “Prohibiting surveillance-based price discrimination and surge pricing for retail goods,” HB 2481 would ban businesses from using data-driven algorithms to adjust prices based on demand, consumer behavior, or real-time market conditions. It mandates uniform pricing and imposes a four-year moratorium on electronic shelf label systems in stores larger than 15,000 square feet. Violations would be treated as unfair practices under the Consumer Protection Act, exposing businesses to lawsuits and penalties.
For businesses that rely on market-demand pricing, such as grocers optimizing inventory during peak times, this legislation would spell disaster. When demand spikes, like during holidays or supply disruptions, allowing prices to rise signals suppliers to increase production and delivery. Banning this flexibility could lead to chronic shortages, as seen in regulated markets where fixed prices discourage restocking. Imagine empty shelves for essentials because suppliers can’t justify the extra effort without compensating margins. Washington’s grocers, already squeezed by thin margins (often 1-2%), would face higher operational costs to maintain steady supplies, ultimately passing those burdens onto consumers through elevated baseline prices.
HB 2481’s broad definitions exacerbate the problem. “Surveillance pricing” is poorly defined and the moratorium on electronic shelves ignores how these tools reduce labor costs for manual updates and enable quick adjustments to wholesale changes. Larger retailers, excluded from small-business exemptions, will shoulder compliance headaches, including audits and legal risks, diverting resources from growth and hiring.
HB 2481 is not price protection. It is government overreach that distorts markets and punishes adaptability. In a state grappling with inflation and supply chain woes, HB 2481 could worsen access to goods, deter investment, and favor out-of-state competitors unbound by these rules.
Policymakers should reject this bill and embrace policies that empower businesses to respond to market signals, ensuring abundance and affordability for all Washingtonians.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Merwin Day of Fishing for Kids with Disabilities celebrates 26 years
Pacific Power raises thousands of fish specifically so every child can catch and keep up to five rainbow trout. - Gluesenkamp Perez introduces the Protecting Columbia River Salmon Act to remove predatory sea lions
H.R. 9637 would give Columbia River Tribes lethal removal authority over predatory sea lions threatening endangered salmon runs. - Journey Theater presents ‘Into the Woods’
Journey Theater’s five-performance run of Into the Woods opens July 31 at Heritage High School in Vancouver. - Six months in, WA has paid unemployment to more than 100 striking workers
Washington’s Employment Security Department has paid nearly $506,000 to 138 striking workers since January 1. - Charter Review Commission Amendment 26-07: Housing Impact Analysis
Amendment 26-07 requires a public, data-driven housing analysis before Clark County can change land use or construction codes. - Charter Review Commission Amendment 26-01: Clarifying Nonpartisan Office Elections
Amendment 26-01 would skip the primary when two or fewer candidates run for a nonpartisan county office. - Host families, coaches, players work together to create winning chemistry for Ridgefield Raptors
Ridgefield Raptors players credit host families and coaches for building instant bonds that fueled a 20-7 first-half record.
