Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center states that ‘either one of these bills could stop the payroll tax before it ever starts’

Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center

No hearing is scheduled in the Washington state Legislature for either House Bill 1011 or Senate Bill 5479. These two pieces of legislation could prevent a payroll tax from bringing you a pay decrease in July. Washington state’s W-2 workers should ready their budgets for the hit. The decrease will be 58 cents for every $100 earned. 

A long-term-care law (House Bill 1087) passed by the state in 2019 set up this payroll tax to fund a program you’re probably seeing or hearing about in your Facebook feed, on Pandora or elsewhere. The program is called WA Cares. Despite aggressive marketing telling you that you can count on this money to help you someday, it should not be giving you any sort of peace of mind: Many workers won’t qualify for a program benefit, the benefit isn’t enough to cover most people’s long-term-care needs even if you do qualify, and a portion of your income that could have gone toward your needs, savings or investments is not going to be in your control.

Repealing the law is in the best interest of the state’s workers, allowing them to keep more of their income to handle long-term care or other life needs. House Bill 1011 would do this outright. The bill points out the promised benefit’s inadequacy and the law’s unpopularity, and it questions the fund’s solvency. The bill has 30 legislators signing on to cosponsor the bill that was brought forward by Rep. Peter Abbarno, R-Centralia. Those lawmakers include 30 Republicans and one Democrat, Rep. Larry Springer, D-Kirkland.

I hear that Senate Bill 5479 might be more palatable to the majority party that wants WA Cares to stay on the books. It is being sponsored by three Senators, two Republicans — Sens. John Braun, R-Centralia, and Mark Schoesler, R-Ritzville — and one Democrat, Rep. Mark Mullet, D-Issaquah. 

SB 5479 doesn’t repeal the long-term-care law outright. It would delay the payroll tax until voters could weigh in on a referendum about the law in the next general election. The bill reads, “The secretary of state shall submit section 2 of this act to the people for their adoption and ratification, or rejection, at the next general election to be held in this state ….” It should be noted that Washington Advisory Vote 20, a non-binding question concerning whether to maintain or repeal House Bill 1087, was on the November 2019 ballot. A majority of voters voted in favor of repeal.

Either one of these bills could stop the payroll tax before it ever starts. That’s important. Lawmakers in charge of what gets heard in this year’s Legislature need to seriously consider doing that. There is going to be ongoing trouble with the implementation of this unwanted social program.

Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Washington state keeps making it harder for law enforcement to serve
  Washington ranks last in the nation for police staffing — 1.37 officers per 1,000 residents vs. the national average of 2.31.
• 
  Opinion: The nation’s first pension raid is happening in Washington state
  HB 2034 would strip billions from LEOFF 1 and redirect funds to unrelated state spending, setting a national precedent.
• 
  Opinion: I-5 Bridge replacement project – Tolls will cause massive traffic diversion to I-205
  Stantec’s investment-grade study projects I-5 traffic dropping from 127,000 to 77,000 vehicles per day once tolls begin.
• 
  Letter: I-5 Bridge – Eliminate light rail, include two auxiliary lanes each way instead
  IBR’s own data shows two auxiliary lanes outperform the recommended one-lane design on every congestion measure.
• 
  Opinion: Remembering the fallen through the symbol of the Red Poppy
  American Legion Auxiliary Tum Tum Unit 168 hosts a National Poppy Day outreach in Yacolt on May 22.