Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center wants Commerce to refocus the $3.1 million it is spending to reduce the barriers the state created into simplifying the rules that are causing the problem in the first place
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
In a recent opinion piece in the Seattle Times, former State Senator and current Washington State Director of Commerce, Lisa Brown, rightly describes the difficulties a small business startup faces in Washington State. Director Brown then says the Department of Commerce is helping small business owners navigate the complicated array of regulations and mandates that the very same government agency had previously imposed.
Director Browns article completely glosses over the underlying problem small businesses face when they first start; that is, over complex government regulations.
Instead of pouring money into programs to help businesses deal with overly complex regulations that Director Brown helped create, the Department of Commerce should focus on reducing the barriers to small businesses through a reduction in over burdensome regulations and complexity in the tax and licensing code. All can be achieved at a much lower cost. Reducing regulations also helps businesses long term and not just in the short term.
Take the business licensing requirements for municipalities as an example. Several cities are now issuing licenses based on the number of hours worked requiring businesses to track the hours employees are working inside the city limits (referred to as nexus) and pay based on a multiple of 1920 hours (one full time employee). This placed a burden on businesses to track where and when every hour is worked.
The reporting not a huge burden if you operate within one municipality, but when you have employees traveling to customer sites all over the state, the problem becomes significantly more difficult to track. If a business operates in 20 cities, it needs 20 different licenses, all with their own requirements on reporting and payment. Many businesses do not have the time to comply and just ignore the requirements.
Another example is the proportional (or destination) sales tax requirements. Each business has to track the sales tax rate (which often changes quarterly) in each political subdivision and charge a customer the appropriate rate depending on the type of work or product that was performed. Reporting this to the state is done at a municipal level, so every business has to collate this information based not on customer totals, but based on activities in the municipality, taxable and tax exempt.
Commerce should refocus the $3.1 million it is spending to reduce the barriers the state created in the business environment, into simplifying the rules that are causing the problem in the first place. Changing the focus to regulation simplification will have a long lasting, positive impact on every business in the state and will create a more equitable business environment.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: Rising property values hurt our community
A Hockinson resident argues that rising property values and taxes are forcing longtime neighbors out of the community and eroding its social fabric. - Opinion: Inviting courts into health care policy discussion
Elizabeth New (Hovde) warns that Senate Joint Resolution 8206 could invite lawsuits by placing vague health care mandates into Washington’s Constitution. - Opinion: 24 States In. Washington Out? $732 Million Lost?
Vicki Murray argues Washington risks forfeiting $732 million in federal education funding if state leaders do not opt into the federal tax-credit scholarship program. - Opinion: Nationwide strike in support of illegals and opposing the rule of law?
Lars Larson argues that a reported nationwide strike reflects opposition to immigration enforcement and the rule of law, criticizing political leaders and media coverage. - POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment.
