Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi questions whether chronic contamination near King Street and West 12th Street meets federal and state stormwater permit standards.

Peter Bracchi 
for Clark County Today

For over eight years, the intersection of King Street and West 12th Street has functioned as a chronic source of unmanaged urban pollution.

This area surrounding the Share House men’s shelter repeatedly experiences:

• Garbage piled next to storm drains
• Human waste and fecal contamination
• Petroleum residue and vehicle leakage
• Synthetic debris and treated materials exposed to rain
• Sidewalk blockages and recurring biohazards

When it rains, everything along that curb flows directly into the municipal stormwater system— and that system ultimately discharges into the Columbia River.

The City of Vancouver operates under the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology under the federal Clean Water Act. That permit allows discharge into the Columbia River — but only under strict conditions.

The city must:

Use AKART — All Known, Available, and Reasonable methods of prevention
Manage pollutants to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP)
Target specific contaminants, including:

• Sediment
• Heavy metals (copper, zinc)
• Petroleum hydrocarbons
• Nutrients and fecal coliform bacteria
• Temperature impacts

The permit also requires elimination of illicit discharges — including sewage — from entering the storm system.

So here is the basic question:

How does allowing visible fecal contamination and unmanaged debris at a known stormwater discharge point meet AKART or MEP standards?

For eight years, this location has operated in a cycle of reactive cleanup rather than preventive control. If fecal coliform bacteria is a targeted pollutant, visible human waste near catch basins raises compliance questions. If petroleum hydrocarbons are targeted, unmanaged street conditions should concern regulators. If illicit discharges must be prohibited, chronic contamination entering the system cannot simply be tolerated.

Meanwhile, the city is investing millions to address PFAS contamination in drinking water wells. PFAS are “forever chemicals” that persist and bioaccumulate. Many treated consumer products — including water-resistant fabrics and synthetic materials — are known sources. Yet there appears to be no publicly reported sampling specific to this corridor to determine what is entering the stormwater system upstream.

Stormwater compliance does not begin at a treatment plant. It begins at the curb.

This issue is not about homelessness policy. It is about environmental standards applied evenly. The Clean Water Act does not provide exemptions for politically sensitive areas. Pollution entering the Columbia River is pollution — regardless of its source.

After eight years, residents deserve answers:

• Has targeted bacteria testing been conducted here?
• Is this hotspot reflected clearly in annual stormwater reports?
• Are preventive Best Management Practices being used — or just emergency cleanup?
• Is the city truly meeting AKART and MEP at this location?

If Vancouver is serious about protecting the Columbia River, it should:

1. Conduct targeted stormwater sampling at King and West 12th.
2. Publicly release bacteria, heavy metal, hydrocarbon, and PFAS screening data.
3. Implement consistent preventive sanitation controls.
4. Enforce public right-of-way and stormwater rules uniformly.

Environmental stewardship cannot be selective. Eight years of unmanaged runoff at a known discharge point demands measurable accountability.

The Columbia River deserves better — and so do Clark County residents.

Peter Bracchi is a Vancouver resident and frequent contributor to Clark County Today.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’
  Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.
• 
  Letter: Don’t leave Longview in the dark
  Longview Mayor Erik Halvorson warns that uncertainty in Washington’s energy policy is deterring manufacturing investment, citing a local project’s move to the Gulf as evidence of this statewide challenge.
• 
  Opinion: Hiring someone for jobs around the house?
  Households in Washington that hire caregivers or cleaners will have to keep records, offer contracts, and follow new compliance rules under HB 2355.
• 
  Letter: Our way or the highway?
  City emails and memos revealed a clash over hiring control for the Downtown Redevelopment Authority, highlighting the city’s behind-the-scenes influence as public tension mounted in Vancouver.
• 
  Opinion: The ballooning cost of the I-5 bridge between Oregon and Washington is unjustified
  Transit agencies saw ridership fall even as population grew, yet the proposed I-5 bridge replacement now comes with a 240% higher price tag than first estimated.