Camas resident Anthony Teso says illegal immigrants are protected by the U.S. Constitution

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

Do illegal immigrants have constitutional rights? Yes, immigrants are protected by the U.S. Constitution. Key provisions, such as due process and equal protection under the law, apply to all persons, including both documented and undocumented immigrants. 

This means that all the rights granted to citizens in the U.S. Constitution are also given to immigrants. Key provisions, such as due process and equal protection under the law, apply to all persons, including both documented and undocumented immigrants. 

We are protected from illegal search and seizure, and so are immigrants. We are accorded due process, so are immigrants; we have a right to an attorney, so are immigrants; we have a right to a hearing, so are immigrants. When we curtail one group’s rights we leave open the door to losing our rights too.

Anthony Teso
Camas

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: ‘A more responsible approach must be sought’
  Ken Vance argues a $10 billion funding gap makes the phased I-5 Bridge approach fiscally reckless, not responsible.
• 
  POLL: Do patriotic displays like Yacolt’s road striping help strengthen community spirit?
  A Yacolt road striping project tied to America’s 250th anniversary is dividing opinion in Clark County.
• 
  Opinion: The challenges of getting the Brockmann mental health facility open
  A $42 million, 48-bed mental health campus near WSU Vancouver was completed in 2025 but never opened due to lack of state funding.
• 
  Opinion: Washington’s business exodus accelerates due to high taxes, regulations driving companies away
  Washington’s business relocation rate has nearly tripled since winter 2025, per an AWB survey.
• 
  Letter: Food service, public health, and the Men’s Share House question
  Peter Bracchi asks why Share House’s 96,987 annual meals face less public-health scrutiny than a waterfront restaurant.