🎧 Should Vancouver Go PFAS-Free on Camping Gear?
Peter Bracchi believes environmental responsibility should not stop where political discomfort begins
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
The city of Vancouver is preparing to spend tens of millions of dollars installing Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) filtration systems and upgrading multiple water stations to remove PFAS “forever chemicals” from our drinking water supply.
Peter Bracchi
Why? Because PFAS contamination is now serious enough that the EPA dramatically lowered allowable limits to just 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS.
The cost to the public will be enormous.
Unlike cities with a single centralized treatment facility, Vancouver operates multiple groundwater wells and water stations spread across the city. That means multiple treatment systems, multiple infrastructure upgrades, ongoing carbon replacement costs, energy costs, testing costs, engineering costs, and long-term maintenance expenses extending for decades.
At the same time, for more than eight years, the city has tolerated repeated accumulations of garbage, discarded tents, burned materials, waterproof tarps, treated fabrics, plastics, and other camping debris around the Men’s Share House corridor.
City crews have repeatedly cleaned the area. Police and fire departments have repeatedly responded. Tons of waste have accumulated over time in a corridor directly exposed to rainwater, runoff, and storm drains.
Does it really take a scientist to ask whether eight-plus years of outdoor waste, treated camping gear, burned synthetic materials, and street debris may have contributed some level of PFAS or other contaminants into stormwater and groundwater?
Testing may be required to prove the exact amount. But common sense says this issue deserves serious evaluation.
The answer is not to attack homeless individuals. The answer is to modernize policy and reduce environmental risk.
Vancouver should begin transitioning publicly funded outreach programs, shelters, and donated supply systems toward PFAS-free tents, tarps, rain gear, and outdoor materials whenever feasible.
If we are willing to spend millions filtering PFAS from drinking water, we should also be willing to reduce preventable sources of contamination where we can.
Environmental responsibility should not stop where political discomfort begins.
Peter Bracchi Vancouver
Also read:
- Let’s Go Washington prepares to gather signatures for income tax repeal effort
Let’s Go Washington needs 308,911 signatures by July 2 to put the income tax before voters in November. - Letter: ‘Once you decide your political opponents are sick, you don’t have to listen to anything they say’Camas resident Tony Teso argues Ken Vance’s column reframes political disagreement as mental illness to avoid engaging on substance.
- Opinion: Greg Johnson’s $2 million contract delivered a huge mess
Johnson’s $1.9M pay coincided with IBR costs tripling and construction timeline doubling to 20 years. - POLL: What issue should be the top priority for Southwest Washington’s next member of Congress?
Sen. John Braun criticized WA’s new income tax while outlining his congressional priorities in Vancouver. - Opinion: The Democrats’ disproportionate response to Trump
Ken Vance argues Democratic hostility toward Trump has crossed from politics into dangerous derangement.
