Hockinson resident Carolyn Schultz-Rathbun says ‘the heart of our community is slipping slowly away’

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

Brian Hebert’s recent letter to the editor urges support for the current Hockinson School District levy because it would increase property values. But Hockinson property values have been increasing at a dizzying rate already. And for most of us, those inflated property values just mean ever-higher property taxes: over 54% higher since 2015.

Hebert suggests that rising property values strengthen our community. Let’s think about that for a moment. 

Hockinson is experiencing rural gentrification, a process in which affluent people move into small towns and rural areas, get involved politically and civically, and shift civic priorities away from the needs of existing residents, toward their own wants and needs. They also, simply by moving to the area, increase property values, which in turn forces existing residents out. 

The ever-higher property values levy proponents prize matter a great deal, of course, to people who sell and move on. But those folks aren’t the heart of the community. 

And neither, for that matter, is HSD, although it has adopted the boilerplate “heart of the community” advertising slogan used by school districts across the state. 

A comparison of OSPI’s personnel data with the Secretary of State’s registered voter database shows that over two-thirds of HSD employees live outside Hockinson.

The heart of our community are people who put down roots here. They have no plans to leave. They don’t want to leave. But the effect of skyrocketing property values, and of the resulting skyrocketing property taxes, is to keep forcing out members of our community who are on the economic margins – the old, the disabled, single moms. 

I’ve watched a steady exodus over the past 10 years of friends and neighbors driven out by rising property taxes. And, ironically, rising property values make it almost impossible for our kids, educated in Hockinson schools, to settle in Hockinson and raise families here after they graduate. 

A community draws its strength from its diversity. But in Hockinson those who can afford to remain are, increasingly, affluent people in their prime earning years. 

The heart of our community is slipping slowly away. 

Continuing to run up property values – which means continuing to force out neighbors who make less than we do – is not how we build or maintain a strong community. 

We are a strong community only to the extent that we are a real community – not simply a bunch of people who live in proximity to each other, but people who know each other, care about each other, and look out for each other. 

One of levy proponents’ main talking points is that a vote for the levy is a vote to increase property values. Let’s be honest about what that means. A vote for the levy is a vote for still-higher property taxes – and a vote to force out a few more of our neighbors.

Carolyn Schultz-Rathbun
Hockinson

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
  Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief.
• 
  Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
  Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
• 
  POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
  Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.
• 
  Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
  Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.
• 
  Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
  Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.