Brush Prairie resident Robert Mattilla shares the continued problems with plans for the I-5 Bridge replacement project
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
The last time I checked, The Coast Guard, in charge of river traffic, and The Federal Aviation Administration, in charge of the airports, one on both sides of the river, are ninety feet apart on the height of the bridge. If they have not compromised in the 15 years of planning the bridge, they never will.

The best option I see is to expand the I-205 Bridge with another bridge on both sides of the existing ones, as there is no height problem there, and expand the roads leading to I-205. The other alternative would be to make the new bridges lift bridges. Otherwise it is a waste of time and money to keep on planning something that CANNOT BE BUILT.
I am not in favor of light rail, but putting it on the new bridge is not a good idea. If we can’t have a new bridge without it, put it on the railway bridge a mile west, or on the newer one of the existing bridges, the southbound one. In the case of a bridge lift, buses could fill in.
Bob Mattila
Brush Prairie
Also read:
- Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement published for Interstate Bridge Replacement ProgramFederal agencies published the final environmental impact statement for the Interstate Bridge replacement project.
- Speed cameras designed to bring added safety to work zonesWSP issued 65,000 infractions in first year, with 59,000 being penalty-free first offenses as program expands statewide.
- Marie Gluesenkamp Perez seeks federal assistance in combating sea lion predation of salmon & steelhead fishing stockCongresswoman pushes for expanded lethal removal authority as sea lions devour Columbia River fish stocks.
- Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning signIBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval.
- Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning signIBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval.






