Engineer Bob Ortblad claims the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program is misrepresenting the risk of the current I-5 bridges collapsing during an earthquake
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program (IBR) is misrepresenting the risk of the current I-5 bridges collapsing during an earthquake.

The IBR claims that liquefaction will cause the I-5 bridges to fail, similar to the Niigata Bridge in Japan, which had only nine 52-foot-long, widely spaced piles per pier. In contrast, the I-5 bridges have 100-foot-long, tightly spaced wood piles (90 per pier) that compact the soil, making them resistant to liquefaction.
A Japanese study has demonstrated that closely spaced wood piles enhance soil compaction and serve as a “fail-safe against liquefaction damage.” The IBR plans to use only six drilled shafts per pier, which will not effectively improve soil compaction. Additionally, the IBR’s bridge design may be less resilient to earthquakes than the current I-5 bridges. The IBR’s bridge trusses will be twice as long, twice as wide, fifty feet higher, and five times heavier. Its 120-foot piers will rest on only six drilled shafts (up to 250 feet long) in uncompacted soil.

The increased weight and height of the IBR bridge, combined with its support on uncompacted soil, may make it less resilient than the current bridges during an earthquake. Resilience is defined as the capacity to withstand or quickly recover from damage. Consequently, repairing any earthquake-induced damage to the existing bridges would be much faster than repairing a significantly larger and heavier IBR bridge.
Bob Ortblad MSCE, MBA
Seattle
Also read:
- Letter: Buyer beware (caveat emptor)Bob Ortblad argues the IBR recycled a $200M bridge design while spending $30M on public relations.
- Ferguson rebuffs GOP lawmaker’s call to pause WA climate lawFerguson’s office says high gas prices stem from Trump’s war in Iran, not a climate law emergency.
- Opinion: Comparing destruction vs refurbishment of the Interstate BridgesRep. John Ley argues $390M earmarked for bridge demolition could fund a seismic retrofit and new express span instead.
- WSP ‘Surviving Summer’ campaign begins in JuneMore than 1,500 people have died in Washington summer crashes over the past eight seasons, averaging 60 fatal collisions per month.
- Opinion: ‘A more responsible approach must be sought’Ken Vance argues a $10 billion funding gap makes the phased I-5 Bridge approach fiscally reckless, not responsible.






