Brush Prairie resident Brian Hebert says ‘voting YES on the Hockinson SP&O Replacement Levy is the smart financial choice for homeowners’
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
There is a simple truth in Hockinson that sometimes gets lost in political noise. We are a strong community and strong schools protect strong property values.

You do not have to have children in the district past, future or present to feel the impact. Whether you have lived here for decades, recently purchased a home, or may sell in the future, the quality of Hockinson’s schools is reflected in the single largest investment most of us will ever make: our homes.
The data is clear for every dollar invested in local schools, property values increase by roughly twenty dollars. The Brookings Institution reported that homes near high-performing schools sell for more than two hundred thousand dollars above comparable homes near lower-performing schools. A 2022 analysis from the Urban Institute concluded that stable school funding is one of the most reliable predictors of neighborhood economic strength and home price resilience, even during downturns.
In other words, maintaining school funding is not just about supporting students. It is about protecting our own financial futures.
Hockinson itself is proof of this connection. Our reputation, desirability, and rural but thriving character did not happen by accident. Strong schools made this community a place people actively seek out. Without them, Hockinson becomes just another zip code on a map.
There is also a key misunderstanding that deserves clarity. This levy is not a new tax. It is a replacement levy that keeps the district operating at the same basic service level we have today. The district continues to run lean, and the levy rate remains below the legal maximum. This is not about funding extravagance. It is about protecting essentials such as staffing, safety, student support services, extracurricular programs, and transportation. These are the elements that keep a district functional and a community attractive to families and businesses.
Failing the levy would not save taxpayers money. It would cost taxpayers in home equity, community desirability, lost programs, declining enrollment, and long-term damage to the district’s reputation. Once a community loses its standing as a place with strong schools, property values drop and they do not rebound quickly.
A levy failure does not just hurt students. It hurts homeowners, business owners, and anyone who cares about the stability and identity of Hockinson.
Opponents often argue that schools should live within their means. The truth is that our district already does. What rarely gets discussed is the cost of doing nothing. That cost shows up in home listings, property assessments, and eventually the decision to move elsewhere.
Every strong community in Washington shares one common trait. They invest in their schools. Not because it is political. Not because it benefits only some residents. But because it benefits everyone.
Voting YES on the Hockinson SP&O Replacement Levy is the smart financial choice for homeowners. It is the stability vote. It is the community value vote. It is the future-focused vote.
For the sake of property values, the local economy, and the identity of Hockinson itself, I will be voting YES and I encourage others to do the same.
Brian Hebert
Brush Prairie
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘Seeking might over right destroys representative government’Retired judge Dave Larson argues that prioritizing political power over constitutional principles has undermined representative government and calls for renewed civic responsibility.
- Letter: ‘Immigration’ resolution scheduled for this Wednesday at Clark County Council MeetingRob Anderson urges residents to closely watch an upcoming Clark County Council meeting where an immigration-related resolution and proposed rule changes are expected to be discussed.
- Opinion: The 1700-square-foot solution to Washington’s housing crisisAn opinion column arguing that Washington’s energy code has driven up housing costs and outlining how HB 2486 aims to limit those impacts for smaller, more affordable homes.
- Letter: Public school visionClark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families.
- Opinion: House Bill 1834 would create a regulatory nightmare and restricts parental control on social mediaMark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 1834 would undermine parental authority and create sweeping regulatory and legal risks under the guise of protecting minors online.








Several observations about the comments of the author. (1) +The levy is called an EP&O not SP&O; (2) About 2/3rds of property owners have no students in the system. For them there is little concern about schools other than costs; (3) The levy IS a new tax…it’s an increase…so they call it a renewal but it is more money. As to whether you make money the more you spend on schools it’s unlikely taxpayers find that claim credible. Take a look at the OSPI data for the district and see what you think: https://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/ReportCard/ViewSchoolOrDistrict/100106
Mr Rylander,
1. To your assertion that this is called an EP&O vs SP&O please reference the documents below:
https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/hockinson-school-district-board-places-renewal-levy-on-february-2026-ballot/
https://core-docs.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/5079/HSD/6171714/Mailer-final_1%282%29.pdf
https://www.forhockschools.com/
2. “Most property owners don’t have students”
It’s true that many property owners do not currently have children enrolled in the district but that does not make school funding irrelevant to them. Strong, stable schools are one of the primary drivers of property values, buyer demand, and community stability. Schools affect everyone who lives, works, or owns property here, regardless of whether they have children in the system today.
3. “This is a new tax”
This is a replacement levy, not a new tax. The existing levy is expiring by law and must be renewed by voters to continue current services. If the levy fails, funding is reduced automatically and programs and staffing are cut. The dollar per $1000 of assessed value is the same and will reduce over the life of this Levy cycle. RCW 84.52.053
4. “Spending more doesn’t benefit taxpayers”
No one is arguing that unlimited spending guarantees returns. The point is that stable, predictable school funding supports consistent services, staffing, and programs that all conditions for conditions that are widely recognized as contributing to community desirability and long-term property value stability. OSPI data shows Hockinson has the second highest SBA scores in Clark County with the second lowest cost per student along with consistently highest graduating percentage in the sate at 97% 2024-25
Thank you for your interest in Hockinson Schools.